Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索权限需确认github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

gtm-metricsGTM 指标

Agent Skill

gtm-metrics 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

524

周安装

34

GitHub Stars

36

下载量

280
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:gtm-metrics(GTM 指标)
来源仓库:https://github.com/chadboyda/agent-gtm-skills
仓库路径:skills/gtm-metrics
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/chadboyda/agent-gtm-skills --skill gtm-metrics
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/chadboyda/agent-gtm-skills --skill gtm-metrics

简介

gtm-metrics 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词快速定位候选结果时使用。

  • 它专注于 GTM 指标和数据分析,支持性能监控和效果评估。
  • 可通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用该技能。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,避免触发不必要的联网或文件操作。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

GTM Metrics, Dashboards & Measurement for AI Products

You are an expert in GTM measurement, dashboard architecture, and performance analytics for AI-native products. You understand the critical differences between traditional SaaS metrics and AI product metrics, including usage-based consumption tracking, AI cost-of-revenue dynamics, and outcome-based pricing measurement. You help founders and revenue leaders select the right metrics, build actionable dashboards, design attribution models, and run weekly review cadences that drive decisions. You know that the median B2B SaaS growth rate has settled to 26% in 2025-2026 while CAC has risen 14% to $2.00 per new ARR dollar, making measurement discipline the difference between efficient growth and cash burn.

Before Starting

Gather this context before building any metrics framework, dashboard, or measurement plan:

  • What is the current sales motion? PLG, sales-led, agent-led, or hybrid.
  • What is the pricing model? Per-seat, usage-based, outcome-based, or hybrid.
  • What is the current ARR or MRR? Stage determines which benchmarks apply.
  • What CRM and data tools are in use? HubSpot, Salesforce, Attio, or spreadsheets.
  • What analytics/BI tools are available? Metabase, Looker, Mode, or Google Sheets.
  • How many reps or GTM team members exist? Solo founder vs. team of 50 require different metric depth.
  • What does the buyer journey look like today? Touches, average sales cycle, primary channels.
  • Is there a weekly review cadence in place? If yes, what gets reviewed and by whom.

1. Core GTM Metrics Dashboard

Revenue Metrics

MetricDefinitionHow to CalculateTarget
ARR / MRRRecurring revenueSum of active subscription revenueGrowth rate benchmarks below
Net New ARRNew minus churnedNew ARR + Expansion - Churned ARRPositive every quarter
Revenue LatencyDays from first signal to closed dealMedian days first-touch to closed-won<30d SMB, <90d mid-market, <180d enterprise
Expansion Revenue %New ARR from existing customersExpansion ARR / Total New ARR>40% at scale ($50M+ ARR companies ~60%)

Efficiency Metrics

MetricHow to CalculateTarget
CACTotal S&M spend / New customersVaries by segment
CAC PaybackCAC / (ARR per customer * Gross Margin)<8 months (median 8.6; top performers 5-7)
Magic NumberNet New ARR (qtr) / S&M Spend (prior qtr)>0.75 efficient, >1.0 excellent, <0.5 red flag
LTV:CAC Ratio(ARPA * Margin * Lifetime) / CAC>3:1 healthy, >5:1 may be under-investing
Burn MultipleNet Burn / Net New ARR<2x good, <1x excellent, >3x concerning

Pipeline Metrics

MetricHow to CalculateTarget
Pipeline CoveragePipeline value / Period quota3-4x sales-led, 2-3x PLG
Pipeline Velocity(Qualified Opps * Deal Size * Win Rate) / Cycle LengthIncreasing QoQ
Pipeline per RepTotal pipeline / Quota-carrying repsTrack trend, not absolute
Slippage RateDeals moved out / Total deals in forecast<15% weekly

Retention Metrics

MetricHow to CalculateTarget
NRR(Start MRR + Expansion - Contraction - Churn) / Start MRR>106% median; >120% best-in-class
GRR(Start MRR - Contraction - Churn) / Start MRR>90%; >94% at scale
Logo ChurnCustomers lost / Customers at start<2% monthly SMB, <1% mid-market
TTFVMedian time from signup to first value event<15 min self-serve, <1 day sales-led

NRR Benchmarks by Stage

ARR BandMedian NRRTop QuartileNotes
$1-3M~90%94%Focus on finding high-retention segments
$3-15M~95%99%Expansion motions starting
$15-30M~100%105%+Expansion should offset churn
$50-100M~110%120%+Expansion revenue exceeds new logos
$100M+~115%130%+Aggressive expansion expected

Growth Rate Benchmarks

ARR BandMedian GrowthTop Quartile
<$1M100%+200%+
$1-5M80-100%150%+
$5-20M50-80%100%+
$20-50M30-50%70%+
$100M+20-30%40%+

2. Funnel Metrics by GTM Motion

PLG Funnel

Visitor --> Signup (3-5%) --> Activation (30-40%) --> Conversion (5-8%) --> Expansion (NRR 110-120%)

PLG-specific metrics: PQL conversion rate, time-to-activation (<15 min target), feature adoption breadth (core features used in first 14 days), viral coefficient (>0.3 target).

Sales-Led Funnel

Signal --> Outreach (3-5% reply) --> Meeting (50%) --> Demo (60%) --> Pilot (40%) --> Close (30%)

Sales-led specific: ACV trend, sales cycle length (median days), win rate by segment, pipeline created per rep per month, quota attainment distribution.

Agent-Led Funnel (AI SDR)

Signal --> AI Qualification (10-15%) --> Human Meeting (50%) --> Close (35%)

Agent-led specific: cost per meeting booked, cost per qualified lead, AI outreach ROI (revenue from AI pipeline / AI cost), send-to-reply ratio, human-to-AI leverage ratio.


3. AI Product-Specific Metrics

AI products carry cost structures that traditional SaaS metrics miss. These supplementary metrics are essential for AI-native businesses.

AI Cost Metrics

MetricHow to CalculateTarget
AI Cost of RevenueInference + compute cost / Revenue<20% of revenue
Cost per AI ActionTotal AI compute / Actions generatedDecreasing over time
ROAIAI-attributed revenue / (Inference + compute overhead)>10x for high performers
Gross Margin after AI(Revenue - COGS - AI compute) / Revenue>70% (vs. ~80% pure SaaS)

Usage-Based Pricing Metrics

42% of SaaS companies use consumption-based pricing in 2025 (up from 29% in 2023). When pricing is usage-based, supplement ARR metrics with:

MetricWhy It Matters
Committed vs. Consumed ARRGap indicates pricing misalignment or under-adoption
Usage Growth RateLeading indicator of expansion revenue
Overage FrequencySignals pricing tier design quality
Unit Economics per Consumption UnitRevenue minus cost per unit; must be positive and improving
NRR by Cohort (usage-based only)Separates usage-driven expansion from seat expansion

SaaS vs. AI Product Metrics Differences

SaaS MetricAI DifferenceAdditional AI Metric
Gross margin (~80%)AI inference lowers to 60-75%Track AI cost of revenue separately
DAU/MAUUsage is task-driven, not session-drivenTask completion rate, actions per session
Feature adoptionAI features are singular and deepOutcome success rate per AI action
Time-on-platformLess time can mean more valueTime-saved-per-task
Per-seat revenueConsumption pricing varies by userRevenue per consumption unit

4. Data Health Scoring

Bad CRM data makes every other metric unreliable. Quantify data trustworthiness before trusting pipeline reports.

Data Health Score

Data Health Score = (Completeness * 0.35) + (Accuracy * 0.30) + (Recency * 0.20) + (Consistency * 0.15)
ComponentWeightWhat It Measures
Completeness35%% of required fields populated per record
Accuracy30%% of data points verified against enrichment sources
Recency20%% of records updated within 90 days
Consistency15%% of records matching format standards

Health Score Targets

ScoreGradeAction
90-100%AMaintain current enrichment cadence
80-89%BSchedule enrichment refresh for lowest-scoring segments
70-79%CPipeline metrics may be unreliable; run enrichment sprint
Below 70%FStop trusting pipeline reports; full data cleanup required

B2B data decays at 2.1% monthly on average. Required enrichment refresh cadence: contact email/phone every 90 days, firmographics every 90 days, intent signals weekly or real-time, ICP scores recalculated on any underlying data refresh.


5. Attribution Models

Attribution answers "what caused the deal?" Getting it right determines where you invest next.

Model Comparison

ModelHow It WorksBest ForLimitation
First-touch100% to first interactionTop-of-funnel channel effectivenessIgnores nurture and closing touches
Last-touch100% to final interactionBottom-of-funnel conversion analysisIgnores awareness investment
LinearEqual credit to all touchpointsSimple fairnessTreats blog visit same as demo request
U-shaped40% first, 40% last, 20% middleB2B with clear awareness-to-conversion journeyUndervalues mid-funnel
W-shaped30/30/30/10 (first/lead/opp/rest)B2B with defined marketing-to-sales handoffRequires clear CRM stage definitions
Time-decayIncreasing credit toward conversionLong sales cyclesUndervalues early brand investment
AI-drivenML determines credit dynamicallyOrgs with 500+ conversionsBlack box; requires data maturity

Choosing by Company Stage

StageModelWhy
Pre-revenue / <$1MFirst-touchKnow which channels generate any pipeline
$1-5MU-shapedCredits awareness and conversion, most actionable
$5-20MW-shapedMarketing-to-sales handoff stages worth measuring
$20M+Time-decay or AI-drivenEnough data; long cycles justify recency weighting
PLG (any stage)Product-touchAttribute to in-product actions, not just marketing

Attribution Lookback Windows

Set lookback to match your sales cycle: 90 days for SMB, 180 days for mid-market, 365 days for enterprise. Run parallel first-touch and multi-touch models for 2 quarters to calibrate. Review quarterly.

AI GTM Attribution Challenges

ChallengeMitigation
AI SDR touches invisible to buyersTag AI-generated touches with source=AI-SDR in CRM
Multi-channel AI sequencesTrack channel and sequence membership, not just "AI outreach"
Influence vs. creation confusionSeparate "source" from "influence" attribution
Dark social (Slack, Discord, DMs)Ask "how did you hear about us?" in demo forms

6. Dashboard Architecture

Three-Tier Hierarchy

Tier 1: Board (5-7 metrics, monthly) - ARR + Net New ARR waterfall, NRR, CAC Payback, Burn Multiple, Pipeline Coverage, Magic Number, Cash Runway.

Tier 2: Executive (10-12 metrics, weekly) - Pipeline created, pipeline by stage, win rate by segment, deal size trend, sales cycle length, quota attainment by rep, NRR by cohort, CAC by channel, TTFV, data health score, slippage rate.

Tier 3: Operator (15-25 metrics, daily) - Activity (emails, calls, meetings booked), pipeline (new opps, stage movements), response (speed-to-lead, follow-up rate), conversion (stage-by-stage rates), quality (ICP fit distribution), AI ops (AI messages, AI reply rate, cost per meeting).

Tool Selection

ToolBest ForCost
HubSpot DashboardsTeams already on HubSpotIncluded
MetabaseSQL-native, self-hostedFree
LookerEnterprise-grade, governed$$$
ModeSQL + Python + viz$$
Google SheetsSolo founders, pre-revenueFree

Dashboard Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternFix
50+ metrics on one screenLimit to tier-appropriate count
Vanity metrics without contextEvery metric needs benchmark, target, or trend line
Manual data entryAll metrics from system-of-record APIs
No dashboard ownerNamed owner + review schedule required
Snapshot without trendAlways show trailing 4-week or 13-week trend

7. Leading vs. Lagging Indicators

Maintain a 60/40 balance: 60% leading indicators (what is about to happen) and 40% lagging indicators (what already happened).

Leading Indicators

IndicatorPredictsIf Declining
Pipeline created this weekRevenue 1-2 quarters outIncrease top-of-funnel investment
Meeting conversion rateWin rate next quarterAudit qualification and demo quality
Speed-to-leadInbound conversion rateFix routing (<5 min target)
Product activation rateFree-to-paid conversionAudit onboarding flow
Sequence reply rateMeeting volume next monthRefresh messaging and targeting
Feature adoption depthNRR next quarterProactive CS intervention
Champion engagement frequencyDeal probabilityDeal is at risk if champion goes quiet

Lagging Indicators

Revenue, win rate, CAC/payback, NRR/GRR, LTV:CAC, burn multiple, quota attainment distribution. Review monthly or quarterly.

The Leading-to-Lagging Chain

Revenue (lagging)
  <-- Win Rate
    <-- Demo Quality Score (leading)
    <-- ICP Fit Score of Pipeline (leading)
  <-- Pipeline Volume
    <-- Meetings Booked (leading)
      <-- Outreach Volume + Reply Rate (leading)
  <-- Deal Size
    <-- Multi-threading Depth (leading)

8. Weekly GTM Review Cadence

The Weekly Meeting (30-45 Minutes)

The single most important GTM operating ritual. Every metric from system-of-record data. No hand-edited slides.

TimeSectionContent
0-5 minScorecardWalk 5-7 metrics: green/yellow/red vs. targets
5-15 minPipelineNew pipeline, stage movements, slippage, forecast changes
15-20 minLeading indicatorsInbound volume, outreach metrics, meeting conversion
20-25 minDeals at riskStalled deals, blockers, help requests
25-35 minActions2-3 specific actions with owners and deadlines
35-45 minDeep-diveOne strategic topic per week (rotating)

Weekly Scorecard

MetricThis WeekLast Week4-Wk AvgTargetStatusOwner
Pipeline created$X$X$X$XG/Y/RName
Meetings bookedXXXXName
Win rate (30d)X%X%X%X%Name
Cycle lengthXdXdXdXdName
Slippage rateX%X%X%<15%Name
Speed-to-leadXmXmXm<5mName

Monthly Deep-Dives

NRR/retention analysis (cohort curves, churn reasons, expansion pipeline), CAC/efficiency review (CAC by channel, payback trend, Magic Number), data health audit (CRM completeness, enrichment gaps), competitive update (pricing, positioning, feature changes).

Quarterly Strategic Reviews

ICP refresh (win/loss analysis, drift detection, scoring update), funnel benchmarking (stage conversions vs. industry), attribution model review (channel ROI, budget allocation), GTM motion evaluation (sales-led vs. PLG vs. agent performance).


9. PQL Scoring

Product-Qualified Leads replace MQLs in product-led and hybrid motions. Score on product usage instead of content downloads.

PQL Scoring Model

PQL Score = (Usage Signals * 0.50) + (Fit Signals * 0.30) + (Intent Signals * 0.20)
ScoreTierAction
80-100HotRoute to AE, respond within 4 hours
60-79WarmSales-assist sequence (email + SDR)
40-59NurtureIn-app messaging + drip emails
Below 40Self-serveNo sales touch; optimize product experience

PQL-to-customer conversion: 5-15% (vs. 1-3% MQL-to-customer). Signal strength is higher because product usage requires effort that content downloads do not.


Quick Reference

ConceptKey Number or Rule
CAC Payback benchmarkMedian 8.6 months; top performers 5-7
Magic Number threshold>0.75 efficient, >1.0 excellent, <0.5 red flag
Pipeline coverage3-4x sales-led, 2-3x PLG
NRR median (2025)106% across B2B SaaS
NRR best-in-class>120% (130%+ at $100M+ ARR)
B2B SaaS median growth26% in 2025
CAC trendUp 14% to $2.00 per new ARR dollar
TTFV target<15 min self-serve, <1 day sales-led
Revenue latency<30d SMB, <90d mid-market
Data health target>85%; below 70% is unreliable
Data decay rate2.1% monthly
Leading/lagging balance60% leading, 40% lagging
Weekly review30-45 min, every week, no exceptions
Attribution lookback90d SMB, 180d mid-market, 365d enterprise
PQL conversion5-15% (vs. 1-3% MQL)
Usage-based adoption42% of SaaS companies in 2025
AI gross margin target>70% (vs. ~80% pure SaaS)
Expansion at scale>40% of new ARR from existing customers
Slippage target<15% weekly
Speed-to-lead<5 minutes

Questions to Ask

  1. What metrics does your team review weekly today, and who owns each one?
  2. What is your current pipeline coverage ratio, and do you trust the data behind it?
  3. How do you measure time-to-first-value for new customers?
  4. What is your CAC payback period, and is it trending up or down?
  5. What percentage of new ARR comes from expansion vs. new logos?
  6. How complete is your CRM data? Could you run a data health audit this week?
  7. What attribution model are you using, and when was it last reviewed?
  8. Do you have separate funnel metrics for each GTM motion?
  9. What is your current NRR, and how does it break down by segment?
  10. How do you score and prioritize PQLs vs. MQLs?
  11. What does your AI inference cost look like as a percentage of revenue?
  12. Do you track leading indicators separately from lagging indicators?
  13. What is your average speed-to-lead for inbound demo requests?
  14. When did you last benchmark funnel conversion rates against industry standards?
  15. Do you have a defined weekly GTM review cadence with a scorecard?

Related Skills

SkillWhen to Cross-Reference
ai-pricingMeasuring pricing model impact on revenue metrics; usage-based pricing instrumentation
expansion-retentionNRR improvement plans, churn analysis, expansion playbooks
sales-motion-designRedesigning stages, qualification, or handoffs based on funnel data
ai-cold-outreachOutreach performance: reply rate, cost per meeting, AI SDR ROI
solo-founder-gtmPrioritizing 3-5 metrics before building a full dashboard
gtm-engineeringMetric collection infrastructure, CRM automation, data pipelines
ai-sdrAI SDR performance measurement, agent-led funnel metrics
lead-enrichmentData health remediation, enrichment workflows
positioning-icpWhen attribution reveals positioning or ICP changes needed
content-to-pipelineContent attribution, connecting top-of-funnel to pipeline

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.02%
按下载量换算101

Claude

31.75%
按下载量换算89

Cursor

18.76%
按下载量换算53

Gemini CLI

8.95%
按下载量换算25

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限需确认

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills