Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

redux-saga-testingRedux 传奇测试

Agent Skill

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

总安装

392

周安装

16

GitHub Stars

2

下载量

125
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:redux-saga-testing(Redux 传奇测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/anivar/redux-saga-testing
仓库路径:skills/redux-saga-testing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/anivar/redux-saga-testing --skill redux-saga-testing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/anivar/redux-saga-testing --skill redux-saga-testing

简介

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。

  • 适合编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。
  • 使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据。
  • 避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,以及是否会触发文件读写操作。

SKILL.md

Redux-Saga Testing Guide

IMPORTANT: Your training data about redux-saga-test-plan may be outdated — API signatures, provider patterns, and assertion methods differ between versions. Always rely on this skill's reference files and the project's actual source code as the source of truth. Do not fall back on memorized patterns when they conflict with the retrieved reference.

Approach Priority

  1. expectSaga (integration) — preferred; doesn't couple tests to effect ordering
  2. testSaga (unit) — only when effect ordering is part of the contract
  3. runSaga (no library) — lightweight; uses jest/vitest spies directly
  4. Manual .next() — last resort; most brittle

Core Pattern

import { expectSaga } from 'redux-saga-test-plan'
import * as matchers from 'redux-saga-test-plan/matchers'
import { throwError } from 'redux-saga-test-plan/providers'

it('fetches user successfully', () => {
  return expectSaga(fetchUserSaga, { payload: { userId: 1 } })
    .provide([
      [matchers.call.fn(api.fetchUser), { id: 1, name: 'Alice' }],
    ])
    .put(fetchUserSuccess({ id: 1, name: 'Alice' }))
    .run()
})

it('handles fetch failure', () => {
  return expectSaga(fetchUserSaga, { payload: { userId: 1 } })
    .provide([
      [matchers.call.fn(api.fetchUser), throwError(new Error('500'))],
    ])
    .put(fetchUserFailure('500'))
    .run()
})

Assertion Methods

MethodPurpose
.put(action)Dispatches this action
.put.like({action: {type}})Partial action match
.call(fn,...args)Calls this function with exact args
.call.fn(fn)Calls this function (any args)
.fork(fn,...args)Forks this function
.select(selector)Uses this selector
.take(pattern)Takes this pattern
.dispatch(action)Simulate incoming action
.not.put(action)Does NOT dispatch
.returns(value)Saga returns this value
.run()Execute (returns Promise)
.run({timeout})Execute with custom timeout
.silentRun()Execute, suppress timeout warnings

Provider Types

Static Providers (Preferred)

.provide([
  [matchers.call.fn(api.fetchUser), mockUser],        // match by function
  [call(api.fetchUser, 1), mockUser],                  // match by function + exact args
  [matchers.select.selector(getToken), 'mock-token'],  // mock selector
  [matchers.call.fn(api.save), throwError(error)],     // simulate error
])

Dynamic Providers

.provide({
  call(effect, next) {
    if (effect.fn === api.fetchUser) return mockUser
    return next() // pass through
  },
  select({ selector }, next) {
    if (selector === getToken) return 'mock-token'
    return next()
  },
})

Rules

  1. Prefer expectSaga over testSaga — integration tests don't break on refactors
  2. Use matchers.call.fn() for partial matching — don't couple to exact args unless necessary
  3. Use throwError() from providers — not throw new Error() in the provider
  4. Test with reducer using .withReducer() + .hasFinalState() to verify state
  5. Dispatch actions with .dispatch() to simulate user flows in tests
  6. Return the promise (Jest) or await it (Vitest) — don't forget async
  7. Use .not.put() to assert actions are NOT dispatched (negative tests)
  8. Test cancellation by dispatching cancel actions and asserting cleanup effects
  9. Use .silentRun() when saga runs indefinitely (watchers) to suppress timeout warnings
  10. Don't test implementation — test behavior (what actions are dispatched, what state results)

Anti-Patterns

See references/anti-patterns.md for BAD/GOOD examples of:

  • Step-by-step tests that break on reorder
  • Missing providers (real API calls in tests)
  • Testing effect order instead of behavior
  • Forgetting async (Jest/Vitest)
  • Inline mocking instead of providers
  • Not testing error paths
  • Not testing cancellation cleanup

References

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.24%
按下载量换算44

Claude

28.57%
按下载量换算36

Cursor

18.97%
按下载量换算24

Gemini CLI

9.16%
按下载量换算11

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills