Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

afrexai-post-mortem阿弗雷赛尸检

Agent Skill

afrexai-post-mortem 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

16,867

周安装

689

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

5,402
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:afrexai-post-mortem(阿弗雷赛尸检)
来源仓库:https://github.com/1kalin/afrexai-post-mortem
安装命令:
openclaw skills install afrexai-post-mortem
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install afrexai-post-mortem

简介

通过根本原因分析、行动跟踪和预防措施来指导结构化、无过错的事后分析,以减少重复生产事件和停机。

SKILL.md

Post-Mortem & Incident Review Framework

Run structured post-mortems that actually prevent repeat failures. Blameless analysis, root cause identification, and action tracking.

When to Use

  • After any production incident, outage, or service degradation
  • After a missed deadline, failed launch, or lost deal
  • After any event costing >$5K or >4 hours of team time
  • Quarterly review of recurring incident patterns

Post-Mortem Template

1. Incident Summary (Complete Within 24 Hours)

Incident ID: [AUTO-GENERATED]
Date/Time: [Start] → [End] (Duration: X hours)
Severity: SEV-1 (revenue impact) | SEV-2 (customer impact) | SEV-3 (internal impact)
Impact: [Users affected] | [Revenue lost] | [SLA breached Y/N]
Detection: How was it found? (Monitoring / Customer report / Internal discovery)
Detection Delay: Time from incident start → first alert

2. Timeline (Minute-by-Minute for SEV-1, 15-min blocks for SEV-2/3)

HH:MM - Event description
HH:MM - First alert triggered
HH:MM - Team notified
HH:MM - Investigation started
HH:MM - Root cause identified
HH:MM - Fix deployed
HH:MM - Confirmed resolved

3. Root Cause Analysis — 5 Whys

Why 1: [Direct cause]
Why 2: [Why did that happen?]
Why 3: [Why did THAT happen?]
Why 4: [Systemic cause]
Why 5: [Organizational/cultural root]

4. Contributing Factors

Score each factor 0-3 (0=not a factor, 3=primary contributor):

FactorScoreNotes
Missing/inadequate monitoring
Insufficient testing
Documentation gaps
Process not followed
Knowledge concentration (bus factor)
Capacity/scaling limits
Third-party dependency
Communication breakdown
Change management failure
Technical debt

5. What Went Well

List 3-5 things that worked during the response:

  • Fast detection? Good runbooks? Strong communication? Quick escalation?

6. Action Items

Every action MUST have an owner and deadline:

#ActionOwnerDeadlinePriorityStatus
1P0/P1/P2Open

Priority definitions:

  • P0: Must complete before next business day
  • P1: Must complete within 1 week
  • P2: Must complete within 1 sprint/month

7. Recurrence Prevention

  • [ ] Monitoring added/improved for this failure mode
  • [ ] Runbook created/updated
  • [ ] Test coverage added
  • [ ] Architecture change needed? (If yes, create RFC)
  • [ ] Training needed for team?

Blameless Post-Mortem Rules

  1. Focus on systems, not individuals
  2. "What happened" not "who did it"
  3. Assume everyone acted with best intentions and available information
  4. The goal is learning, not punishment
  5. If you find yourself writing someone's name next to a mistake, rewrite it as a process gap

Incident Cost Calculator

Direct costs:
  Revenue lost during downtime: $___
  SLA credits issued: $___
  Emergency vendor/contractor costs: $___

Indirect costs:
  Engineering hours × loaded rate: ___ hrs × $___/hr = $___
  Customer churn risk (affected users × churn probability × LTV): $___
  Brand/reputation (estimate): $___

Total incident cost: $___
Cost per minute of downtime: $___

Quarterly Incident Review

Every quarter, analyze patterns across all post-mortems:

  1. Top 3 root cause categories — Where should you invest in prevention?
  2. Mean time to detect (MTTD) — Is monitoring improving?
  3. Mean time to resolve (MTTR) — Is response getting faster?
  4. Action item completion rate — Are you actually fixing things?
  5. Repeat incidents — Same root cause twice = systemic failure
  6. Cost trend — Total incident cost per quarter (should decrease)

Industry-Specific Post-Mortem Considerations

IndustryKey FocusRegulatory Requirement
FintechTransaction integrity, audit trailSOX, PCI-DSS incident reporting
HealthcarePHI exposure, patient safetyHIPAA breach notification (60 days)
SaaSSLA compliance, data integritySOC 2 incident management
E-commerceOrder integrity, payment processingPCI-DSS, consumer protection
ManufacturingSafety incidents, production lossOSHA reporting requirements

Go Deeper

Your post-mortems reveal where AI agents should be deployed first — the repetitive failures, the manual monitoring gaps, the processes that break under load.

- Pick 3: $97 | All 10: $197 | Everything: $247

*Built by AfrexAI — turning incident patterns into automation opportunities.*

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

86.48%
按下载量换算4,672

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills