Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

you-aint-gonna-need-it你不会需要它

Agent Skill

you-aint-gonna-need-it 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

659

周安装

28

GitHub Stars

10

下载量

231
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:you-aint-gonna-need-it(你不会需要它)
来源仓库:https://github.com/yanko-belov/code-craft
仓库路径:skills/you-aint-gonna-need-it
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/yanko-belov/code-craft --skill you-aint-gonna-need-it
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/yanko-belov/code-craft --skill you-aint-gonna-need-it

简介

you-aint-gonna-need-it 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词快速定位候选结果。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意可能触发联网或外部服务调用。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

YAGNI (You Ain't Gonna Need It)

Overview

Don't implement something until you actually need it.

Every feature has a cost: code to write, tests to maintain, complexity to manage. Speculative features often go unused while creating real burden.

When to Use

  • Adding features "users might want later"
  • Building "production-ready" infrastructure upfront
  • Adding flexibility "in case requirements change"
  • Implementing patterns "because best practices"
  • Creating abstractions for hypothetical use cases

The Iron Rule

NEVER build features until they're actually required.

No exceptions:

  • Not for "users will probably want this"
  • Not for "it's easy to add now"
  • Not for "production systems need this"
  • Not for "best practices say include this"

Detection: The "Might Need" Smell

If your justification includes "might", "probably", "eventually", or "in case", STOP:

// ❌ VIOLATION: Asked for 3 endpoints, built 15
// Request: GET/POST/DELETE todos
// Built: pagination, filtering, sorting, soft delete, restore,
//        rate limiting, health checks, metrics, audit logs,
//        batch operations, search, tags, priorities, due dates...

// ✅ CORRECT: Build exactly what was asked
app.get('/todos', (req, res) => { /* list todos */ });
app.post('/todos', (req, res) => { /* create todo */ });
app.delete('/todos/:id', (req, res) => { /* delete todo */ });

The Cost of Speculative Features

Every unneeded feature costs:

Cost TypeImpact
Development timeHours building unused code
Testing burdenTests for features nobody uses
MaintenanceUpdates, security patches, dependency management
ComplexityMore code = more bugs, harder onboarding
Cognitive loadDevelopers must understand unused systems
Technical debtSpeculative abstractions often wrong

Correct Pattern: Minimal First

Build the minimum that solves the actual problem:

// ❌ YAGNI VIOLATION: "Production-ready" todo API
// - Zod validation with inference
// - Pagination with cursors
// - Full-text search
// - Soft delete + restore
// - Rate limiting
// - Request tracing
// - Health endpoints
// - Graceful shutdown
// - Structured logging
// ... for a simple todo list

// ✅ CORRECT: What was actually requested
interface Todo {
  id: string;
  title: string;
  completed: boolean;
}

const todos: Todo[] = [];

app.get('/todos', (req, res) => res.json(todos));

app.post('/todos', (req, res) => {
  const todo = { id: crypto.randomUUID(), title: req.body.title, completed: false };
  todos.push(todo);
  res.status(201).json(todo);
});

app.delete('/todos/:id', (req, res) => {
  const index = todos.findIndex(t => t.id === req.params.id);
  if (index === -1) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'Not found' });
  todos.splice(index, 1);
  res.status(204).send();
});

// Add pagination WHEN users have enough todos to need it
// Add search WHEN users ask for search
// Add rate limiting WHEN there's abuse

Pressure Resistance Protocol

1. "Production Systems Need This"

Pressure: "Real production apps have logging, monitoring, health checks..."

Response: Add production features when going to production. Not during prototyping.

Action: Build MVP first. Add infrastructure when deploying for real.

2. "It's Easy to Add Now"

Pressure: "While I'm here, might as well add sorting and filtering"

Response: Easy to add now = easy to add later. Don't pay the maintenance cost until needed.

Action: Add it when someone actually needs it.

3. "Best Practices Say..."

Pressure: "Best practices recommend pagination, rate limiting, etc."

Response: Best practices are for problems you have. Don't solve problems you don't have.

Action: Follow best practices for your actual requirements.

4. "Users Will Want This"

Pressure: "Users will probably want to filter by date"

Response: "Probably" is not a requirement. Wait for actual user requests.

Action: Ship without it. Add when users actually ask.

Red Flags - STOP and Reconsider

If you notice ANY of these, you're violating YAGNI:

  • "While I'm at it, I'll also add..."
  • "Users might want to..."
  • "In case we need to..."
  • "Let's make it production-ready"
  • "Best practices recommend..."
  • Building abstractions for single use cases
  • Adding configuration for things that won't change

All of these mean: Stop. Build only what's required.

What YAGNI Is NOT

YAGNI doesn't mean:

  • Write bad code (quality is always needed)
  • Skip error handling (that's required)
  • Ignore security (that's required from day 1)
  • Avoid good structure (clean code is required)

YAGNI means: Don't add features and capabilities until they're needed.

Quick Reference

SpeculativeWait Until
PaginationList exceeds reasonable size
Rate limitingActual abuse occurs
Soft deleteUsers request undo capability
Full-text searchUsers request search
Audit loggingCompliance requires it
Multi-tenancySecond tenant exists
CachingPerformance problems measured

Common Rationalizations (All Invalid)

ExcuseReality
"Production systems need this"Add when going to production.
"It's easy to add now"Then it's easy to add later too.
"Users will probably want it"Wait until they actually do.
"Best practices say..."For problems you have, not might have.
"It'll be harder later"Usually false. Context will be clearer later.
"We'll need it eventually"Eventually isn't now.

The Bottom Line

Build what's needed. Nothing more.

When tempted to add "just one more feature": stop, check if it's required NOW, ship without it. The best code is code you didn't have to write.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

28.02%
按下载量换算65

Codex

25.85%
按下载量换算60

Antigravity

17.14%
按下载量换算40

windsurf

12.93%
按下载量换算30

Gemini CLI

9.1%
按下载量换算21

github-copilot

3.78%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills