Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
运维和基础设施只读github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

domain-driven-design领域驱动设计

Agent Skill

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范、排版、配色、布局和交互体验优化。它适合让 Agent 根据产品场景整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案、检查视觉一致性或改进组件层级。使用时需要结合现有品牌、设计系统和用户任务,不应只堆装饰元素;涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现。

总安装

6,891

周安装

293

GitHub Stars

160

下载量

2,414
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:domain-driven-design(领域驱动设计)
来源仓库:https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit
仓库路径:skills/domain-driven-design
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit --skill domain-driven-design
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit --skill domain-driven-design

简介

用于辅助领域模型设计和系统架构规划。domain-driven-design 属于运维和基础设施类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

  • 适合整理业务实体、聚合根和上下文映射关系。
  • 使用时需结合产品场景定义限界上下文边界。
  • 涉及代码实现时应保持与现有架构风格一致。
  • 安装前请确认项目是否采用微服务或分层架构模式。

SKILL.md

Domain-Driven Design Tactical Patterns

Model complex business domains with entities, value objects, and bounded contexts.

Overview

  • Modeling complex business logic
  • Separating domain from infrastructure
  • Establishing clear boundaries between subdomains
  • Building rich domain models with behavior
  • Implementing ubiquitous language in code

Building Blocks Overview

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    DDD Building Blocks                       │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  ENTITIES           VALUE OBJECTS        AGGREGATES         │
│  Order (has ID)     Money (no ID)        [Order]→Items      │
│                                                              │
│  DOMAIN SERVICES    REPOSITORIES         DOMAIN EVENTS      │
│  PricingService     IOrderRepository     OrderSubmitted     │
│                                                              │
│  FACTORIES          SPECIFICATIONS       MODULES            │
│  OrderFactory       OverdueOrderSpec     orders/, payments/ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Quick Reference

Entity (Has Identity)

from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from uuid import UUID
from uuid_utils import uuid7

@dataclass
class Order:
    """Entity: Has identity, mutable state, lifecycle."""
    id: UUID = field(default_factory=uuid7)
    customer_id: UUID = field(default=None)
    status: str = "draft"

    def __eq__(self, other: object) -> bool:
        if not isinstance(other, Order):
            return NotImplemented
        return self.id == other.id  # Identity equality

    def __hash__(self) -> int:
        return hash(self.id)

Load Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/entities-value-objects.md") for complete patterns.

Value Object (Immutable)

from dataclasses import dataclass
from decimal import Decimal

@dataclass(frozen=True)  # MUST be frozen!
class Money:
    """Value Object: Defined by attributes, not identity."""
    amount: Decimal
    currency: str

    def __add__(self, other: "Money") -> "Money":
        if self.currency != other.currency:
            raise ValueError("Cannot add different currencies")
        return Money(self.amount + other.amount, self.currency)

Load Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/entities-value-objects.md") for Address, DateRange examples.

Key Decisions

DecisionRecommendation
Entity vs VOHas unique ID + lifecycle? Entity. Otherwise VO
Entity equalityBy ID, not attributes
Value object mutabilityAlways immutable (frozen=True)
Repository scopeOne per aggregate root
Domain eventsCollect in entity, publish after persist
Context boundariesBy business capability, not technical

Rules Quick Reference

RuleImpactWhat It Covers
aggregate-boundaries (load ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/rules/aggregate-boundaries.md)HIGHAggregate root design, reference by ID, one-per-transaction
aggregate-invariants (load ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/rules/aggregate-invariants.md)HIGHBusiness rule enforcement, specification pattern
aggregate-sizing (load ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/rules/aggregate-sizing.md)HIGHRight-sizing, when to split, eventual consistency

When NOT to Use

Under 5 entities? Skip DDD entirely. The ceremony costs more than the benefit.

PatternInterviewHackathonMVPGrowthEnterpriseSimpler Alternative
AggregatesOVERKILLOVERKILLOVERKILLSELECTIVEAPPROPRIATEPlain dataclasses with validation
Bounded contextsOVERKILLOVERKILLOVERKILLBORDERLINEAPPROPRIATEPython packages with clear imports
CQRSOVERKILLOVERKILLOVERKILLOVERKILLWHEN JUSTIFIEDSingle model for read/write
Value objectsOVERKILLOVERKILLBORDERLINEAPPROPRIATEREQUIREDTyped fields on the entity
Domain eventsOVERKILLOVERKILLOVERKILLSELECTIVEAPPROPRIATEDirect method calls between services
Repository patternOVERKILLOVERKILLBORDERLINEAPPROPRIATEREQUIREDDirect ORM queries in service layer

Rule of thumb: DDD adds ~40% code overhead. Only worth it when domain complexity genuinely demands it (5+ entities with invariants spanning multiple objects). A CRUD app with DDD is a red flag.

Anti-Patterns (FORBIDDEN)

# NEVER have anemic domain models (data-only classes)
@dataclass
class Order:
    id: UUID
    items: list  # WRONG - no behavior!

# NEVER leak infrastructure into domain
class Order:
    def save(self, session: Session):  # WRONG - knows about DB!

# NEVER use mutable value objects
@dataclass  # WRONG - missing frozen=True
class Money:
    amount: Decimal

# NEVER have repositories return ORM models
async def get(self, id: UUID) -> OrderModel:  # WRONG - return domain!

Related Skills

  • aggregate-patterns - Deep dive on aggregate design
  • ork:distributed-systems - Cross-aggregate coordination
  • ork:database-patterns - Schema design for DDD

References

Load on demand with Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/<file>"):

FileContent
entities-value-objects.mdFull entity and value object patterns
repositories.mdRepository pattern implementation
domain-events.mdEvent collection and publishing
bounded-contexts.mdContext mapping and ACL

Capability Details

entities

Keywords: entity, identity, lifecycle, mutable, domain object Solves: Model entities in Python, identity equality, adding behavior

value-objects

Keywords: value object, immutable, frozen, dataclass, structural equality Solves: Create immutable value objects, when to use VO vs entity

domain-services

Keywords: domain service, business logic, cross-aggregate, stateless Solves: When to use domain service, logic spanning aggregates

repositories

Keywords: repository, persistence, collection, IRepository, protocol Solves: Implement repository pattern, abstract DB access, ORM mapping

bounded-contexts

Keywords: bounded context, context map, ACL, subdomain, ubiquitous language Solves: Define bounded contexts, integrate with ACL, context relationships

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

25.8%
按下载量换算623

Gemini CLI

22.17%
按下载量换算535

Antigravity

17.68%
按下载量换算427

OpenCode

12.14%
按下载量换算293

Codex

8.36%
按下载量换算202

Cursor

3.32%
按下载量换算80

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills