Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

hiringhiring 开发

Agent Skill

hiring 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

519

周安装

21

GitHub Stars

167

下载量

163
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:hiring(hiring 开发)
来源仓库:https://github.com/whawkinsiv/claude-code-skills
仓库路径:skills/hiring
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/whawkinsiv/claude-code-skills --skill hiring
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/whawkinsiv/claude-code-skills --skill hiring

简介

hiring 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据任务场景快速定位候选结果。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装并使用。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态,避免触发联网或命令执行。
  • 建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

SKILL.md

Hiring Technical Help

The most expensive developer is the cheap one who breaks things. This skill helps you decide when to hire vs. use AI tools, find and vet contractors, and manage the founder-developer relationship — even if you can't evaluate code yourself.

This skill is for hiring and managing technical people. For writing specs contractors can build from, use plan. For trying AI tools before hiring, use build. For legal contracts and IP protection, use legal.

Core Principles

  • Hire for the problem, not the role. Define what you need done before you look for who can do it.
  • A great contractor beats a mediocre full-time hire every time at this stage.
  • You can't evaluate code, but you can evaluate communication, reliability, and results.
  • The most expensive developer is the cheap one who breaks things. Budget for quality.
  • AI tools have moved the line. Many things that used to require hiring now don't.

When to Hire vs. When to Use AI Tools

You Do NOT Need to Hire If:

  • You need a landing page → Use Lovable, Framer, or Webflow
  • You need a CRUD app (create, read, update, delete data) → Use Claude Code, Lovable, or Replit
  • You need to integrate Stripe → Tell AI to do it (see payments)
  • You need basic auth → AI tools handle this well
  • You need UI polish → AI + design system handles 80% of this
  • You need simple bug fixes → Describe the bug to Claude Code

You DO Need to Hire When:

  • Complex integrations — Connecting to enterprise APIs with poor documentation
  • Performance at scale — Your app is slow under load and AI-generated fixes aren't working
  • Data migrations — Moving from one database or architecture to another
  • Security audit — You need someone to verify your AI-generated code is secure
  • Native mobile apps — AI tools are weaker here (improving, but still)
  • Infrastructure you don't understand — Something is broken in production and you can't debug it
  • Ongoing maintenance — You're spending more time fixing than building

Decision Framework

Do I need to hire?
1. Can I describe the task clearly enough for an AI tool? → Try AI first
2. Did AI fail or produce something that doesn't work? → Try a different AI prompt
3. Still stuck after 2-3 serious attempts? → Time to hire
4. Is this a one-time task or ongoing? → One-time = contractor. Ongoing = consider part-time.

Tell AI:

I'm trying to decide if I need to hire a developer. Here's what I need done:
[describe the task]

I've tried: [what AI tools you used, what happened]

Help me decide: can this be solved with a better prompt or approach,
or do I genuinely need a human developer? If I need to hire,
what type (freelance contractor, part-time dev, agency)?

Types of Technical Help

TypeCostBest ForWhere to Find
Freelance contractor$50-150/hrOne-time tasks, specific features, bug fixesUpwork, Toptal, referrals
Part-time developer$2-6K/moOngoing development, 10-20 hrs/weekIndie communities, referrals
Fractional CTO$3-8K/moArchitecture decisions, code review, hiring other devsToptal, referrals, FounderPath
Dev agency$5-20K/projectFull builds, redesignsClutch.co, referrals
Technical co-founderEquityBuilding the company together, long-termCo-founder matching, network

For most solo bootstrapped founders: Start with a freelance contractor.


Finding Good Developers

Where to Look (Ranked by Quality)

  1. Personal referrals — Ask other founders: "Who built your product?" Best source by far.
  2. Indie communities — Indie Hackers, r/forhire, Twitter/X developer community. Developers here understand SaaS.
  3. Toptal — Pre-vetted, expensive ($80-150+/hr), but high quality and low risk.
  4. Upwork — Huge pool, variable quality. You need to vet carefully. More on this below.
  5. Arc.dev, Gun.io, Lemon.io — Curated freelancer platforms. Mid-range pricing.
  6. Agency — Good for well-defined projects. Expensive. You lose the direct relationship.

Red Flags When Evaluating

  • No portfolio or GitHub — They should be able to show you work they've done
  • Can't explain things simply — If they use jargon to answer simple questions, they'll be hard to work with
  • "I can build anything" — Specialists outperform generalists. Look for experience with your stack
  • No questions about your project — Good developers ask questions before estimating
  • Price way below market — $15-25/hr for a "senior developer" means they're either lying about experience or in a situation where communication overhead will eat the savings
  • Won't do a small paid trial — The best test is a real task (see below)

Green Flags

  • They've built SaaS products before (not just websites or WordPress)
  • They ask clarifying questions about requirements
  • They push back on bad ideas ("You don't need that. Here's a simpler approach.")
  • They communicate proactively ("Here's my progress. I'm blocked on X.")
  • They have experience with your stack (React, Next.js, Supabase, whatever you're using)
  • They can show you something they built that works and looks good

The Paid Trial: Best Hiring Strategy

Never hire based on interviews alone. Do a paid trial.

How It Works

  1. Pick a real but self-contained task from your backlog (a bug fix, a small feature, an integration)
  2. Write a clear brief (see Writing a Job Brief below)
  3. Pay them their normal rate for 5-10 hours of work
  4. Evaluate the result

What You're Evaluating

  • Communication — Did they ask clarifying questions? Did they update you on progress?
  • Speed — How long did it take relative to their estimate?
  • Quality — Does it work? Does it look right? Did they test it?
  • Independence — Did they figure things out on their own or need constant hand-holding?
  • Code quality — You can't read code, but you can: (a) ask Claude Code to review it, (b) ask another developer to glance at it, (c) check if it works without bugs

Tell AI:

Review this code from a contractor I'm evaluating. Check for:
- Obvious bugs or issues
- Security problems
- Code quality and readability
- Whether it follows the existing codebase patterns
[paste code or point to files]

Writing a Job Brief

A good brief gets good candidates. A vague brief gets time-wasters.

Template

# [Task Name]

## What I Need
[2-3 sentences describing the outcome you want. Focus on WHAT, not HOW.]

## Current Setup
- App built with: [framework, e.g., Next.js + Supabase]
- Hosted on: [e.g., Vercel]
- Repo: [GitHub link — you'll share after NDA/agreement]

## Specific Requirements
- [Requirement 1]
- [Requirement 2]
- [Requirement 3]

## What "Done" Looks Like
- [Acceptance criteria 1]
- [Acceptance criteria 2]
- [Acceptance criteria 3]

## Timeline
[When do you need this done?]

## Budget
[Your budget range, or "Tell me your estimate based on this brief"]

## To Apply
Tell me:
1. Have you built something similar before? Show me.
2. How would you approach this?
3. What's your estimated time and cost?
4. What questions do you have?

Tell AI:

Help me write a job brief for a freelance developer. I need:
[describe the task in plain English]
My app is built with [stack]. Format it as a clear brief that
a contractor can estimate from.

Managing Contractors

Communication Cadence

  • Short tasks (< 1 week): Async updates. Ask for a progress update halfway through.
  • Ongoing work: Weekly 15-minute sync call + daily async updates in Slack/email.
  • Complex projects: Start with a kickoff call. Weekly demos of work-in-progress.

Tools

PurposeTool
CommunicationSlack (channel for the project) or email
Task trackingLinear, GitHub Issues, or even a shared doc
Code accessGitHub (add them as a collaborator with limited access)
PaymentsUpwork (built-in), Wise, or direct invoice via Stripe
Screen sharingLoom for async demos, Zoom for live calls

Setting Expectations

Have this conversation before work starts:

Working Agreement:
- [ ] Scope of work defined in writing (the brief)
- [ ] Payment terms agreed (hourly, fixed-price, milestones)
- [ ] Timeline with milestones (not just a final deadline)
- [ ] Communication expectations (how often, which channel)
- [ ] What happens if scope changes (discuss before building)
- [ ] Code ownership (you own everything they write for you)
- [ ] IP assignment clause (in contract or Upwork ToS)
- [ ] Access to repo, environments, and credentials they need
- [ ] Definition of "done" (your acceptance criteria, not theirs)

Budgeting

Market Rates (2024-2025, USD)

LevelUS/UK/EUEastern EuropeLatin AmericaSouth/SE Asia
Junior$40-75/hr$25-45/hr$25-50/hr$15-30/hr
Mid$75-125/hr$40-75/hr$40-75/hr$25-50/hr
Senior$125-200/hr$60-120/hr$60-100/hr$40-80/hr

What to Expect

  • Simple bug fix: 1-4 hours ($50-400)
  • Small feature: 5-20 hours ($250-2,000)
  • Medium feature: 20-60 hours ($1,000-6,000)
  • Full integration: 40-100 hours ($2,000-10,000)
  • Ongoing part-time dev: $2,000-6,000/month for 10-20 hrs/week

Budget Tips

  • Fixed-price for defined tasks. You know the cost upfront. Good for both sides.
  • Hourly for exploration or ongoing work. When scope is unclear, hourly is fairer.
  • Milestone payments for large projects. Pay 30% upfront, 30% at midpoint, 40% on completion.
  • Never pay 100% upfront. And never ask for 100% completion before any payment.

Protecting Yourself

For Any Engagement

  • Written agreement — Even informal. Email confirmation of scope, rate, and timeline counts.
  • Code in your repo — They push to your GitHub repo. You always have the code.
  • Small increments — Weekly deliverables, not a big bang after 2 months.
  • Code reviews — Ask Claude Code to review their work periodically.

For Larger Engagements

  • Freelancer contract — Cover IP assignment, confidentiality, payment terms, termination
  • NDA — If they'll see sensitive business information
  • Use Upwork/Toptal for payment — Built-in dispute resolution if things go wrong

Tell AI:

Write a simple freelancer agreement for a contractor building
[describe the work] for my SaaS product. Include: scope of work,
payment terms, IP assignment, confidentiality, and termination clause.
Keep it short and founder-friendly.

The Fractional CTO Option

If you're growing and need ongoing technical leadership but aren't ready for a full-time CTO:

What a Fractional CTO Does

  • Reviews architecture decisions (should we use X or Y?)
  • Code reviews contractor work
  • Helps you hire and manage developers
  • On-call for production emergencies
  • 5-10 hours per month

When You Need One

  • You have 2+ contractors and need someone to coordinate them
  • You're making architectural decisions that will be expensive to reverse
  • You're about to raise funding and need technical credibility
  • You're growing past what you can manage alone technically

Cost

$3,000-8,000/month for 5-15 hours. Expensive but prevents much more expensive mistakes.


Common Mistakes

MistakeFix
Hiring before trying AI toolsAI handles 70-80% of what non-technical founders need. Try it first
Hiring based on lowest bidCheap developers cost more in total. Budget for mid-range minimum
No written scopeLeads to scope creep and disputes. Write it down before starting
Giving full admin access immediatelyStart with repo collaborator access. Expand as trust builds
No paid trialOne small paid task reveals more than five interviews
Paying 100% upfrontMilestone payments protect both sides
Not reviewing their codeAsk AI to review it. You don't need to read code to check quality
Hiring full-time too earlyContractors first. Hire full-time when you have consistent work for 40 hrs/week

Success Looks Like

  • You have a reliable contractor you can call on for tasks AI can't handle
  • Clear briefs that get accurate estimates and good results
  • Code is always in your repo — you're never dependent on one person
  • You know the difference between "I should hire for this" and "AI can handle this"
  • Your technical costs are predictable and within budget

Related Skills

  • build — Use AI tools yourself before deciding to hire
  • plan — Write specs that contractors can estimate and build from
  • debug — Diagnose issues yourself before escalating to a developer
  • secure — Security requirements to include in contractor briefs

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

33.95%
按下载量换算55

Claude

32.15%
按下载量换算52

Cursor

16.39%
按下载量换算27

Gemini CLI

8.8%
按下载量换算14

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills