Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索external-servicegithub未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

vendor-check供应商检查

Agent Skill

vendor-check 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

18,864

周安装

786

GitHub Stars

11,688

下载量

6,288
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:vendor-check(供应商检查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins
仓库路径:skills/vendor-check
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill vendor-check
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill vendor-check

简介

查找、检索和筛选相关信息,快速定位候选结果。

  • 适用于在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词或任务场景进行信息筛选的场景。
  • 通过 GitHub 安装,结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。
  • vendor-check 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

/vendor-check -- Vendor Agreement Status

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.

Check the status of existing agreements with a vendor across all connected systems. Provides a consolidated view of the legal relationship.

Important: This command assists with legal workflows but does not provide legal advice. Agreement status reports should be verified against original documents by qualified legal professionals.

Invocation

/vendor-check [vendor name]

If no vendor name is provided, prompt the user to specify which vendor to check.

Workflow

Step 1: Identify the Vendor

Accept the vendor name from the user. Handle common variations:

  • Full legal name vs. trade name (e.g., "Alphabet Inc." vs. "Google")
  • Abbreviations (e.g., "AWS" vs. "Amazon Web Services")
  • Parent/subsidiary relationships

Ask the user to clarify if the vendor name is ambiguous.

Step 2: Search Connected Systems

Search for the vendor across all available connected systems, in priority order:

CLM (Contract Lifecycle Management) -- If Connected

Search for all contracts involving the vendor:

  • Active agreements
  • Expired agreements (last 3 years)
  • Agreements in negotiation or pending signature
  • Amendments and addenda

CRM -- If Connected

Search for the vendor/account record:

  • Account status and relationship type
  • Associated opportunities or deals
  • Contact information for vendor's legal/contracts team

Email -- If Connected

Search for recent relevant correspondence:

  • Contract-related emails (last 6 months)
  • NDA or agreement attachments
  • Negotiation threads

Documents (e.g., Box, Egnyte, SharePoint) -- If Connected

Search for:

  • Executed agreements
  • Redlines and drafts
  • Due diligence materials

Chat (e.g., Slack, Teams) -- If Connected

Search for recent mentions:

  • Contract requests involving this vendor
  • Legal questions about the vendor
  • Relevant team discussions (last 3 months)

Step 3: Compile Agreement Status

For each agreement found, report:

FieldDetails
Agreement TypeNDA, MSA, SOW, DPA, SLA, License Agreement, etc.
StatusActive, Expired, In Negotiation, Pending Signature
Effective DateWhen the agreement started
Expiration DateWhen it expires or renews
Auto-RenewalYes/No, with renewal term and notice period
Key TermsLiability cap, governing law, termination provisions
AmendmentsAny amendments or addenda on file

Step 4: Gap Analysis

Identify what agreements exist and what might be missing:

## Agreement Coverage

[CHECK] NDA -- [status]
[CHECK/MISSING] MSA -- [status or "Not found"]
[CHECK/MISSING] DPA -- [status or "Not found"]
[CHECK/MISSING] SOW(s) -- [status or "Not found"]
[CHECK/MISSING] SLA -- [status or "Not found"]
[CHECK/MISSING] Insurance Certificate -- [status or "Not found"]

Flag any gaps that may be needed based on the relationship type (e.g., if there is an MSA but no DPA and the vendor handles personal data).

Step 5: Generate Report

Output a consolidated report:

## Vendor Agreement Status: [Vendor Name]

**Search Date**: [today's date]
**Sources Checked**: [list of systems searched]
**Sources Unavailable**: [list of systems not connected, if any]

## Relationship Overview

**Vendor**: [full legal name]
**Relationship Type**: [vendor/partner/customer/etc.]
**CRM Status**: [if available]

## Agreement Summary

### [Agreement Type 1] -- [Status]
- **Effective**: [date]
- **Expires**: [date] ([auto-renews / does not auto-renew])
- **Key Terms**: [summary of material terms]
- **Location**: [where the executed copy is stored]

### [Agreement Type 2] -- [Status]
[etc.]

## Gap Analysis

[What's in place vs. what may be needed]

## Upcoming Actions

- [Any approaching expirations or renewal deadlines]
- [Required agreements not yet in place]
- [Amendments or updates that may be needed]

## Notes

[Any relevant context from email/chat searches]

Step 6: Handle Missing Sources

If key systems are not connected via MCP:

  • No CLM: Note that no CLM is connected. Suggest the user check their CLM manually. Report what was found in other systems.
  • No CRM: Skip CRM context. Note the gap.
  • No Email: Note that email was not searched. Suggest the user search their email for "[vendor name] agreement" or "[vendor name] NDA".
  • No Documents: Note that document storage was not searched.

Always clearly state which sources were checked and which were not, so the user knows the completeness of the report.

Notes

  • If no agreements are found in any connected system, report that clearly and ask the user if they have agreements stored elsewhere
  • For vendor groups (e.g., a vendor with multiple subsidiaries), ask whether the user wants to check a specific entity or the entire group
  • Flag any agreements that are expired but may still have surviving obligations (confidentiality, indemnification, etc.)
  • If an agreement is approaching expiration (within 90 days), highlight this prominently

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.91%
按下载量换算2,321

Claude

27.07%
按下载量换算1,702

Cursor

19.11%
按下载量换算1,202

Gemini CLI

9.6%
按下载量换算604

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills