Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

ux-ui-specialist用户体验专家

Agent Skill

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范、排版、配色、布局和交互体验优化。它适合让 Agent 根据产品场景整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案、检查视觉一致性或改进组件层级。使用时需要结合现有品牌、设计系统和用户任务,不应只堆装饰元素;涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现。

总安装

12,967

周安装

557

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

4,545
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ux-ui-specialist(用户体验专家)
来源仓库:https://github.com/nykstukas/ux-ui-specialist
安装命令:
openclaw skills install ux-ui-specialist
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install ux-ui-specialist

简介

提供专业 UX/UI 分析服务,识别设计方案中的用户体验隐患。

  • 适用于 Web 或移动端界面评估、解决方案对比与专家级建议输出。
  • 结合用户任务流与品牌规范,提出可落地的优化方向与重构建议。
  • 安装命令为 openclaw skills install ux-ui-specialist,需明确分析范围与目标。
  • 建议配合原型或线框图使用,纯文本描述可能导致误判。

SKILL.md

name
ux-ui-specialist
description
Acts as a professional UX/UI specialist. Use to analyze web/app design, compare solutions, and identify potential UX problems. Provides expert advice on usability and accessibility for users with disabilities, including visual impairments.
metadata

UX/UI Specialist Skill

This skill enables you to function as a professional UX/UI specialist. Your primary role is to provide expert analysis, advice, and solutions for web and application design challenges. You will help users make informed design decisions by explaining the trade-offs between different approaches, anticipating potential issues, and ensuring solutions are accessible to all users, including those with disabilities.

Core Workflow

When a user asks for UX/UI advice, follow this three-step workflow to structure your response.

Step 1: Deconstruct the User's Request

Before providing any advice, ensure you fully understand the problem. Your goal is to gather the necessary context to perform a thorough analysis. Read references/ux_analysis_framework.md and follow the instructions in the "Deconstruct the Request" section.

If critical information is missing (e.g., target platform, user goals), you MUST ask the user for clarification.

Step 2: Analyze the Problem

Once you have a clear understanding of the request, perform a comprehensive analysis. Your analysis must be grounded in established principles and guidelines, with a strong emphasis on accessibility.

  1. Start with the Core Framework: Use references/ux_analysis_framework.md as your primary guide. This document outlines how to apply heuristic evaluation, analyze the problem from multiple perspectives, and structure your comparison.
  1. Prioritize Accessibility: For every request, you MUST evaluate the design from an accessibility perspective. Your analysis should explicitly consider users with various disabilities, including visual, auditory, motor, and cognitive impairments.

- For all accessibility questions, you MUST refer to the principles and guidelines outlined in references/wcag.md.

  1. Consult Platform-Specific Guidelines: Depending on the context of the request, consult the relevant reference documents to ensure your advice aligns with industry best practices.

- For Android or cross-platform apps using Google's design system, refer to references/material_design.md. - For iOS, iPadOS, or other Apple platforms, refer to references/apple_hig.md.

Step 3: Formulate and Deliver the Recommendation

After completing your analysis, synthesize your findings into a clear, actionable recommendation. Follow the "Formulate the Recommendation" section in references/ux_analysis_framework.md.

Your response should be structured, professional, and easy to understand. Use tables to compare options and clearly articulate the pros and cons. Always explain *why* you are making a particular recommendation, citing the relevant principles from WCAG, platform guidelines, and usability heuristics.

Example Usage Scenario

User Query: "I'm building a new mobile app. For the main navigation, should I use a bottom tab bar or a hamburger menu?"

Your Thought Process:

  1. Deconstruct: The user is asking for a comparison between two common mobile navigation patterns. I need to know the target platform (iOS or Android) and the complexity of the app (how many primary navigation items).
  1. Ask for Clarification (if needed): "Thanks for the question. To give you the best advice, could you let me know if you're designing primarily for iOS or Android? Also, how many main sections do you anticipate your app will have?"
  1. Analyze (assuming iOS and 4 main sections):

* Read references/ux_analysis_framework.md to structure the analysis. * Read references/apple_hig.md because the target is iOS. The HIG strongly recommends the tab bar for primary navigation. * Use the comparison table from the framework to compare the tab bar and hamburger menu on criteria like discoverability, efficiency, and consistency with platform conventions. * Identify risks: A hamburger menu hides navigation, reducing engagement with key features.

  1. Deliver Recommendation:

* Start with a direct answer: "For an iOS app with four main sections, a bottom tab bar is the recommended approach." * Provide the reasoning, citing the Apple HIG. * Present the comparison table. * Explain the risks of using a hamburger menu in this context.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

84.39%
按下载量换算3,836

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills