Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

uplo-clinicalUPLO 临床

Agent Skill

uplo-clinical 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

7,104

周安装

299

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

2,488
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:uplo-clinical(UPLO 临床)
来源仓库:https://github.com/roojenkins/uplo-clinical
安装命令:
openclaw skills install uplo-clinical
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install uplo-clinical

简介

临床运营智能系统,统一管理临床试验与医疗方案文档。

  • 支持跨试验搜索患者数据、SOP 与监管提交材料。
  • 适用于药企研发部门加速新药申报流程。uplo-clinical 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 使用前需授权访问 EDC 系统与电子病历数据库。
  • 注意 HIPAA/GDPR 合规要求,禁止传输未脱敏个人信息。

SKILL.md

name
uplo-clinical
description
AI-powered clinical operations intelligence spanning pharmaceutical development and healthcare delivery. Unified search across clinical trials, protocols, and patient care documentation.

UPLO Clinical — Drug-to-Patient Intelligence

Bridge the gap between pharmaceutical R&D and bedside care with a single knowledge layer. UPLO Clinical indexes your clinical trial protocols, investigator brochures, formulary decisions, patient care pathways, and adverse event reports so you can trace a molecule from Phase I through post-market surveillance without switching systems. Think of it as the institutional memory your CRO, hospital CMO, and pharmacovigilance team all wish they had.

Session Start

Pull your identity context immediately. This loads your clearance level, role-based access (investigator, pharmacist, clinical coordinator, etc.), and any active directives such as enrollment freezes or safety signal escalations.

get_identity_context

Next, check whether leadership has issued any trial-wide holds or formulary changes:

get_directives

When to Use

  • Reviewing whether a new Phase III endpoint aligns with prior Phase II secondary findings stored in the knowledge base
  • Determining which IRB-approved consent language was used for a specific patient cohort last quarter
  • Checking the current formulary status of a biosimilar before recommending it on rounds
  • Locating the root-cause analysis from a previous SUSAR (Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction) that resembles a new case
  • Verifying nurse credentialing requirements across departments before a Joint Commission survey
  • Pulling structured extraction data from discharge summaries to answer a clinical quality metric question
  • Finding the SOPs governing sample chain-of-custody for a biomarker sub-study

Example Workflows

Adverse Event Signal Investigation

A safety officer notices a clustering of hepatotoxicity reports in a Phase IIb oncology study. They need to determine if the signal is new or previously documented.

search_with_context query="hepatotoxicity adverse events oncology trial AZ-4471"

Review the returned investigator brochure sections and prior safety narratives. If the signal was documented, pull the exact risk mitigation plan:

search_knowledge query="risk mitigation hepatotoxicity AZ-4471 DSMB recommendations"

Log the investigation for the pharmacovigilance audit trail:

log_conversation summary="Investigated hepatotoxicity signal clustering in AZ-4471 Phase IIb; confirmed pre-existing signal with DSMB mitigation plan from Q2 review" topics='["pharmacovigilance","hepatotoxicity","AZ-4471"]' tools_used='["search_with_context","search_knowledge"]'

Formulary Committee Preparation

A hospital pharmacist is preparing evidence for a P&T Committee meeting to evaluate adding a new anti-coagulant.

search_knowledge query="direct oral anticoagulants clinical outcomes comparison warfarin"

Pull organizational directives to check if there is a cost-containment mandate affecting formulary additions:

get_directives

Gather the structured data from recently extracted clinical studies:

search_with_context query="apixaban vs rivaroxaban bleeding risk hospitalized patients internal studies"

Key Tools for Clinical Operations

search_with_context — The workhorse for clinical questions that span multiple document types. When you ask "What was the primary endpoint result for Study 2201?", this tool pulls the CSR, the statistical analysis plan, and related protocol amendments together via graph traversal. Example: search_with_context query="Study 2201 primary endpoint PFS results ITT population"

search_knowledge — Fast vector search when you know roughly what you need. Ideal for finding a specific SOP, consent form version, or formulary monograph. Example: search_knowledge query="informed consent template pediatric asthma study v3.2"

get_directives — Clinical operations are directive-heavy. Enrollment caps, safety holds, formulary freezes, and budget constraints all flow through directives. Always check before making recommendations. Example output includes active trial holds and department-level care mandates.

export_org_context — Produces a structured snapshot of the entire clinical organization: departments, key personnel (medical director, principal investigators, department heads), active systems (CTMS, EHR, LIMS), and strategic priorities. Invaluable when onboarding a new CRA or preparing a sponsor audit response.

propose_update — When you discover outdated protocol information (e.g., a dosing schedule that was amended), propose a correction rather than silently noting it. The proposal enters a review queue for the clinical data manager.

report_knowledge_gap — If a query about concomitant medication restrictions returns no results, flag it. Gaps in clinical knowledge bases can have patient safety implications, so this escalation matters.

Tips

  • Adverse event queries benefit from MedDRA preferred term vocabulary. Use "rhabdomyolysis" rather than "muscle breakdown" to get precise hits against structured pharmacovigilance extractions.
  • When preparing for a regulatory inspection (FDA, EMA), use export_org_context first to verify that the organizational chart and system inventory match what inspectors will see on-site.
  • Classification tiers matter here more than most domains. Patient-identifiable data is typically restricted; aggregate clinical outcomes may be internal. If a query returns fewer results than expected, it may be a clearance issue rather than a data gap.
  • Log every pharmacovigilance investigation session. Regulatory bodies expect a complete audit trail of signal evaluation activities, and log_conversation creates that record automatically.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

84.02%
按下载量换算2,090

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills