Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

unit-test-scheduled-async单元测试计划异步

Agent Skill

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

总安装

16,502

周安装

674

GitHub Stars

229

下载量

5,284
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:unit-test-scheduled-async(单元测试计划异步)
来源仓库:https://github.com/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit
仓库路径:skills/unit-test-scheduled-async
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill unit-test-scheduled-async
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill unit-test-scheduled-async

简介

测试@Scheduled

  • 和@Async
  • 直接调用方法,无需等待实际执行。
  • 在测试中直接调用异步和调度方法,而不是依赖 Spring 的异步执行器或调度间隔
  • 使用 CompletableFuture.get()
  • 使用明确的超时来等待异步结果,以及 Awaitility.await()
  • 用于基于轮询的状态更改断言
  • 模拟异步方法调用的依赖项,然后在完成后使用 Mockito 验证交互
  • 通过捕获 ExecutionException 来测试异常处理
  • 来自 CompletableFuture.get()
  • 并验证根本原因
  • 需要 JUnit 5、Mockito、Awaitility 和 AssertJ;避免测试实际的 cron 计时或线程池行为

SKILL.md

Unit Testing @Scheduled and @Async Methods

Overview

Patterns for unit testing Spring @Scheduled and @Async methods with JUnit 5. Test CompletableFuture results, use Awaitility for race conditions, mock scheduled task execution, and validate error handling — without waiting for real scheduling intervals.

When to Use

  • Testing @Scheduled method logic
  • Testing @Async method behavior
  • Verifying CompletableFuture results
  • Testing async error handling
  • Testing cron expression logic without waiting for actual scheduling
  • Validating thread pool behavior and execution counts
  • Testing background task logic in isolation

Instructions

  1. Call @Async methods directly — bypass Spring's async proxy; the annotation is irrelevant in unit tests
  2. Mock dependencies with @Mock and @InjectMocks (Mockito)
  3. Wait for completion — use CompletableFuture.get(timeout, unit) or await().atMost(...).untilAsserted(...)
  4. Call @Scheduled methods directly — do not wait for cron/fixedRate; the annotation is ignored in unit tests
  5. Test exception paths — verify ExecutionException wrapping on CompletableFuture.get()

Validation checkpoints:

  • After CompletableFuture.get(), assert the returned value before verifying mock interactions
  • If ExecutionException is thrown, check .getCause() to identify the root exception
  • If Awaitility times out, increase atMost() duration or reduce pollInterval() until the condition is reachable
  • After multiple task invocations, assert execution counts before verify() calls

Examples

Key patterns — complete examples in references/examples.md:

// @Async: call directly, wait with CompletableFuture.get(timeout, unit)
@Service
class EmailService {
  @Async
  public CompletableFuture<Boolean> sendEmailAsync(String to) {
    return CompletableFuture.supplyAsync(() -> true);
  }
}
@Test
void shouldReturnCompletedFuture() throws Exception {
  EmailService service = new EmailService();
  Boolean result = service.sendEmailAsync("test@example.com").get(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
  assertThat(result).isTrue();
}

// @Scheduled: call directly, mock the repository
@Component
class DataRefreshTask {
  @InjectMocks private DataRepository dataRepository;
  @Scheduled(fixedDelay = 60000) public void refreshCache() { /* ... */ }
}
@Test
void shouldRefreshCache() {
  when(dataRepository.findAll()).thenReturn(List.of(new Data(1L, "item1")));
  dataRefreshTask.refreshCache();
  verify(dataRepository).findAll();
}

// Awaitility: use for race conditions with shared mutable state
@Test
void shouldProcessAllItems() {
  BackgroundWorker worker = new BackgroundWorker();
  worker.processItems(List.of("item1", "item2", "item3"));
  Awaitility.await()
    .atMost(Duration.ofSeconds(5))
    .pollInterval(Duration.ofMillis(100))
    .untilAsserted(() -> assertThat(worker.getProcessedCount()).isEqualTo(3));
}

// Mocked dependencies with exception handling
@Test
void shouldHandleAsyncExceptionGracefully() {
  doThrow(new RuntimeException("Email failed")).when(emailService).send(any());
  CompletableFuture<String> result = service.notifyUserAsync("user123");
  assertThatThrownBy(result::get)
    .isInstanceOf(ExecutionException.class)
    .hasCauseInstanceOf(RuntimeException.class);
}

Full Maven/Gradle dependencies, additional test classes, and execution count patterns: see references/examples.md.

Best Practices

  • Always set a timeout on CompletableFuture.get() to prevent hanging tests
  • Mock all dependencies — never call real external services in unit tests
  • Use Awaitility only for race conditions; prefer direct calls for simple async methods
  • Test @Scheduled logic directly — the annotation is ignored in unit tests
  • Assert values before verifying mock interactions; verify after async completion

Common Pitfalls

  • Relying on Spring's async executor instead of calling methods directly
  • Missing timeout on CompletableFuture.get()
  • Forgetting to test exception propagation in async methods
  • Not mocking dependencies that async methods invoke internally
  • Waiting for actual cron/fixedRate timing instead of testing logic in isolation

Constraints and Warnings

  • @Async self-invocation: calling @Async from another method in the same class executes synchronously — the Spring proxy is bypassed
  • Thread pool ordering: ThreadPoolTaskScheduler does not guarantee execution order
  • CompletableFuture chaining: exceptions in intermediate stages can be silently lost — test each stage
  • Awaitility timeout: always set a reasonable atMost(); infinite waits hang the test suite
  • No actual scheduling: @Scheduled is ignored in unit tests — call methods directly

References

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.32%
按下载量换算1,919

Claude

27.8%
按下载量换算1,469

Cursor

18.49%
按下载量换算977

Gemini CLI

7.98%
按下载量换算422

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills