Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

understandunderstand 分析

Agent Skill

understand 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

6,389

周安装

261

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

2,067
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:understand(understand 分析)
来源仓库:https://github.com/lum1104/understand
安装命令:
openclaw skills install understand
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install understand

简介

understand 分析代码库生成交互式知识图,理解架构和组件关系。

  • 适合在 OpenClaw 中需要可视化代码结构的场景。
  • 通过 clawhub 安装后可启动本地分析服务。
  • 使用前需确认项目规模和资源消耗情况。understand 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 建议核对原始 README 了解支持的编程语言和分析深度。

SKILL.md

name
understand
description
Analyze a codebase to produce an interactive knowledge graph for understanding architecture, components, and relationships
argument-hint
[options]

/understand

Analyze the current codebase and produce a knowledge-graph.json file in .understand-anything/. This file powers the interactive dashboard for exploring the project's architecture.

Options

  • $ARGUMENTS may contain:

- --full — Force a full rebuild, ignoring any existing graph - A directory path — Scope analysis to a specific subdirectory


Phase 0 — Pre-flight

Determine whether to run a full analysis or incremental update.

  1. Set PROJECT_ROOT to the current working directory.
  2. Get the current git commit hash:
   git rev-parse HEAD
  1. Create the intermediate output directory:
   mkdir -p $PROJECT_ROOT/.understand-anything/intermediate
  1. Check if $PROJECT_ROOT/.understand-anything/knowledge-graph.json exists. If it does, read it.
  2. Check if $PROJECT_ROOT/.understand-anything/meta.json exists. If it does, read it to get gitCommitHash.
  3. Decision logic:
ConditionAction
--full flag in $ARGUMENTSFull analysis (all phases)
No existing graph or metaFull analysis (all phases)
Existing graph + unchanged commit hashReport "Graph is up to date" and STOP
Existing graph + changed filesIncremental update (re-analyze changed files only)

For incremental updates, get the changed file list:

   git diff <lastCommitHash>..HEAD --name-only

If this returns no files, report "Graph is up to date" and STOP.

  1. Collect project context for subagent injection:

- Read README.md (or README.rst, readme.md) from $PROJECT_ROOT if it exists. Store as $README_CONTENT (first 3000 characters). - Read the primary package manifest (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, pom.xml) if it exists. Store as $MANIFEST_CONTENT. - Capture the top-level directory tree:

     find $PROJECT_ROOT -maxdepth 2 -type f -not -path '*/node_modules/*' -not -path '*/.git/*' -not -path '*/dist/*' | head -100

Store as $DIR_TREE. - Detect the project entry point by checking for common patterns: src/index.ts, src/main.ts, src/App.tsx, main.py, main.go, src/main.rs, index.js. Store first match as $ENTRY_POINT.


Phase 1 — SCAN (Full analysis only)

Dispatch a subagent using the prompt template at ./project-scanner-prompt.md. Read the template file and pass the full content as the subagent's prompt, appending the following additional context:

Additional context from main session: Project README (first 3000 chars): `` $README_CONTENT ` Package manifest: ` $MANIFEST_CONTENT `` Use this context to produce more accurate project name, description, and framework detection. The README and manifest are authoritative — prefer their information over heuristics.

Pass these parameters in the dispatch prompt:

Scan this project directory to discover all source files, detect languages and frameworks. Project root: $PROJECT_ROOT Write output to: $PROJECT_ROOT/.understand-anything/intermediate/scan-result.json

After the subagent completes, read $PROJECT_ROOT/.understand-anything/intermediate/scan-result.json to get:

  • Project name, description
  • Languages, frameworks
  • File list with line counts
  • Complexity estimate

Gate check: If >200 files, inform the user and suggest scoping with a subdirectory argument. Proceed only if user confirms or add guidance that this may take a while.


Phase 2 — ANALYZE

Full analysis path

Batch the file list from Phase 1 into groups of 5-10 files each (aim for balanced batch sizes).

For each batch, dispatch a subagent using the prompt template at ./file-analyzer-prompt.md. Run up to 3 subagents concurrently using parallel dispatch. Read the template once, then for each batch pass the full template content as the subagent's prompt, appending the following additional context:

Additional context from main session: Project: <projectName><projectDescription> Frameworks detected: <frameworks from Phase 1> Languages: <languages from Phase 1> Framework-specific guidance: - If React/Next.js: files in app/ or pages/ are routes, components/ are UI, lib/ or utils/ are utilities - If Express/Fastify: files in routes/ are API endpoints, middleware/ is middleware, models/ or db/ is data - If Python Django: views.py are controllers, models.py is data, urls.py is routing, templates/ is UI - If Go: cmd/ is entry points, internal/ is private packages, pkg/ is public packages Use this context to produce more accurate summaries and better classify file roles.

Fill in batch-specific parameters below and dispatch:

Analyze these source files and produce GraphNode and GraphEdge objects. Project root: $PROJECT_ROOT Project: <projectName> Languages: <languages> Batch index: <batchIndex> Write output to: $PROJECT_ROOT/.understand-anything/intermediate/batch-<batchIndex>.json All project files (for import resolution): <full file path list from scan> Files to analyze in this batch: 1. <path> (<sizeLines> lines) 2. <path> (<sizeLines> lines) ...

After ALL batches complete, read each batch-<N>.json file and merge:

  • Combine all nodes arrays. If duplicate node IDs exist, keep the later occurrence.
  • Combine all edges arrays. Deduplicate by the composite key source + target + type.

Incremental update path

Use the changed files list from Phase 0. Batch and dispatch file-analyzer subagents using the same process as above, but only for changed files.

After batches complete, merge with the existing graph:

  1. Remove old nodes whose filePath matches any changed file
  2. Remove old edges whose source or target references a removed node
  3. Add new nodes and edges from the fresh analysis

Phase 3 — ASSEMBLE

Merge all file-analyzer results into a single set of nodes and edges. Then perform basic integrity cleanup:

  • Remove any edge whose source or target references a node ID that does not exist in the merged node set
  • Remove duplicate node IDs (keep the last occurrence)
  • Log any removed edges or nodes for the final summary

Phase 4 — ARCHITECTURE

Dispatch a subagent using the prompt template at ./architecture-analyzer-prompt.md. Read the template file and pass the full content as the subagent's prompt, appending the following additional context:

Additional context from main session: Frameworks detected: <frameworks from Phase 1> Directory tree (top 2 levels): `` $DIR_TREE ` Framework-specific layer hints: - If React/Next.js: app/ or pages/ → UI Layer, api/ → API Layer, lib/ → Service Layer, components/ → UI Layer - If Express: routes/ → API Layer, controllers/ → Service Layer, models/ → Data Layer, middleware/ → Middleware Layer - If Python Django: views/ → API Layer, models/ → Data Layer, templates/ → UI Layer, management/ → CLI Layer - If Go: cmd/ → Entry Points, internal/ → Service Layer, pkg/ → Shared Library, api/` → API Layer Use the directory tree and framework hints to inform layer assignments. Directory structure is strong evidence for layer boundaries.

Pass these parameters in the dispatch prompt:

Analyze this codebase's structure to identify architectural layers. Project root: $PROJECT_ROOT Write output to: $PROJECT_ROOT/.understand-anything/intermediate/layers.json Project: <projectName><projectDescription> File nodes: ``json [list of {id, name, filePath, summary, tags} for all file-type nodes] ` Import edges: `json [list of edges with type "imports"] ``

After the subagent completes, read $PROJECT_ROOT/.understand-anything/intermediate/layers.json to get the layer assignments.

layers.json may be either:

  • a top-level JSON array of layer objects, or
  • an envelope object such as { "layers": [...] } from the current prompt/template output

Normalize either form into a final top-level layers array before assembling the graph. Each final saved layer object MUST match this exact shape:

[
  {
    "id": "layer:<kebab-case-name>",
    "name": "<layer name>",
    "description": "<what belongs in this layer>",
    "nodeIds": ["file:src/App.tsx", "file:src/main.tsx"]
  }
]

Rules:

  • id is required and must be unique
  • nodeIds is required and must contain graph node IDs, not raw file paths
  • If the intermediate output is an envelope object, unwrap its layers array before any other normalization
  • If the subagent returns file paths, convert them to file node IDs before assembling the final graph
  • Drop any nodeIds that do not exist in the merged node set
  • Do not use a nodes field in the final saved layer objects

For incremental updates: Always re-run architecture analysis on the full merged node set, since layer assignments may shift when files change.

Context for incremental updates: When re-running architecture analysis, also inject the previous layer definitions:

Previous layer definitions (for naming consistency): ``json [previous layers from existing graph] `` Maintain the same layer names and IDs where possible. Only add/remove layers if the file structure has materially changed.

Phase 5 — TOUR

Dispatch a subagent using the prompt template at ./tour-builder-prompt.md. Read the template file and pass the full content as the subagent's prompt, appending the following additional context:

Additional context from main session: Project README (first 3000 chars): `` $README_CONTENT ` Project entry point: $ENTRY_POINT` Use the README to align the tour narrative with the project's own documentation. Start the tour from the entry point if one was detected. The tour should tell the same story the README tells, but through the lens of actual code structure.

Pass these parameters in the dispatch prompt:

Create a guided learning tour for this codebase. Project root: $PROJECT_ROOT Write output to: $PROJECT_ROOT/.understand-anything/intermediate/tour.json Project: <projectName><projectDescription> Languages: <languages> Nodes (summarized): ``json [list of {id, name, filePath, summary, type} for key nodes] ` Layers: `json [layers from Phase 4] ` Key edges: `json [imports and calls edges] ``

After the subagent completes, read $PROJECT_ROOT/.understand-anything/intermediate/tour.json to get the tour steps.

tour.json may be either:

  • a top-level JSON array of tour step objects, or
  • an envelope object such as { "steps": [...] } from the current prompt/template output

Normalize either form into a final top-level tour array before assembling the graph. Each final saved tour step object MUST match this exact shape:

[
  {
    "order": 1,
    "title": "Start at the app entry",
    "description": "This step explains how the frontend boots and mounts.",
    "nodeIds": ["file:src/main.tsx", "file:src/App.tsx"]
  }
]

Rules:

  • If the intermediate output is an envelope object, unwrap its steps array before any other normalization
  • description is required; do not use whyItMatters in the final saved tour steps
  • nodeIds is required; do not use nodesToInspect in the final saved tour steps
  • nodeIds must reference existing graph node IDs
  • Preserve optional languageLesson when present
  • Sort by order before saving

Phase 5.5 — NORMALIZE

Before assembling the final graph:

  • Unwrap legacy or prompt-shaped envelopes before field renaming:

- { "layers": [...] } -> use the contained array as the working layers value - { "steps": [...] } -> use the contained array as the working tour value

  • Convert any layer nodes field to nodeIds
  • Convert any tour nodesToInspect field to nodeIds
  • Convert any tour whyItMatters field to description
  • If layers or tour reference file paths, map them to file node IDs using the file:<relative-path> convention
  • Synthesize missing layer IDs as layer:<kebab-case-name>
  • Drop unresolved layer and tour node references
  • Ensure the final layers value is an array of { id, name, description, nodeIds }
  • Ensure the final tour value is an array of { order, title, description, nodeIds }, preserving optional languageLesson

Phase 6 — REVIEW

Assemble the full KnowledgeGraph JSON object:

{
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "project": {
    "name": "<projectName>",
    "languages": ["<languages>"],
    "frameworks": ["<frameworks>"],
    "description": "<projectDescription>",
    "analyzedAt": "<ISO 8601 timestamp>",
    "gitCommitHash": "<commit hash from Phase 0>"
  },
  "nodes": [<all merged nodes from Phase 3>],
  "edges": [<all merged edges from Phase 3>],
  "layers": [<layers from Phase 4>],
  "tour": [<steps from Phase 5>]
}
  1. Before writing the assembled graph, validate that:

- layers is an array of objects with these required fields: id, name, description, nodeIds - tour is an array of objects with these required fields: order, title, description, nodeIds - tour[*].languageLesson is allowed as an optional string field - Every layers[*].nodeIds entry exists in the merged node set - Every tour[*].nodeIds entry exists in the merged node set

If validation fails, automatically normalize and rewrite the graph into this shape before saving. If the graph still fails final validation after the normalization pass, save it with warnings but mark dashboard auto-launch as skipped.

  1. Write the assembled graph to $PROJECT_ROOT/.understand-anything/intermediate/assembled-graph.json.
  1. Dispatch a subagent using the prompt template at ./graph-reviewer-prompt.md. Read the template file and pass the full content as the subagent's prompt, appending the following additional context:
Additional context from main session: Phase 1 scan results (file inventory): ``json [list of {path, sizeLines} from scan-result.json] ` Phase warnings/errors accumulated during analysis: - [list any batch failures, skipped files, or warnings from Phases 2-5] Cross-validate: every file in the scan inventory should have a corresponding file: node in the graph. Flag any missing files. Also flag any graph nodes whose filePath` doesn't appear in the scan inventory.

Pass these parameters in the dispatch prompt:

> Validate the knowledge graph at $PROJECT_ROOT/.understand-anything/intermediate/assembled-graph.json. > Project root: $PROJECT_ROOT > Read the file and validate it for completeness and correctness. > Write output to: $PROJECT_ROOT/.understand-anything/intermediate/review.json

  1. After the subagent completes, read $PROJECT_ROOT/.understand-anything/intermediate/review.json.
  1. If approved: false:

- Review the issues list - Apply automated fixes where possible: - Remove edges with dangling references - Fill missing required fields with sensible defaults (e.g., empty tags -> ["untagged"], empty summary -> "No summary available") - Remove nodes with invalid types - Re-run the final graph validation after automated fixes - If critical issues remain after one fix attempt, save the graph anyway but include the warnings in the final report and mark dashboard auto-launch as skipped

  1. If approved: true: Proceed to Phase 7.

Phase 7 — SAVE

  1. Write the final knowledge graph to $PROJECT_ROOT/.understand-anything/knowledge-graph.json.
  1. Write metadata to $PROJECT_ROOT/.understand-anything/meta.json:
   {
     "lastAnalyzedAt": "<ISO 8601 timestamp>",
     "gitCommitHash": "<commit hash>",
     "version": "1.0.0",
     "analyzedFiles": <number of files analyzed>
   }
  1. Clean up intermediate files:
   rm -rf $PROJECT_ROOT/.understand-anything/intermediate
  1. Report a summary to the user containing:

- Project name and description - Files analyzed / total files - Nodes created (broken down by type: file, function, class) - Edges created (broken down by type) - Layers identified (with names) - Tour steps generated (count) - Any warnings from the reviewer - Path to the output file: $PROJECT_ROOT/.understand-anything/knowledge-graph.json

  1. Only automatically launch the dashboard by invoking the /understand-dashboard skill if final graph validation passed after normalization/review fixes.

If final validation did not pass, report that the graph was saved with warnings and dashboard launch was skipped.


Error Handling

  • If any subagent dispatch fails, retry once with the same prompt plus additional context about the failure.
  • Track all warnings and errors from each phase in a $PHASE_WARNINGS list. Pass this list to the graph-reviewer in Phase 6 for comprehensive validation.
  • If it fails a second time, skip that phase and continue with partial results.
  • ALWAYS save partial results — a partial graph is better than no graph.
  • Report any skipped phases or errors in the final summary so the user knows what happened.
  • NEVER silently drop errors. Every failure must be visible in the final report.

Reference: KnowledgeGraph Schema

Node Types

TypeDescriptionID Convention
fileSource filefile:<relative-path>
functionFunction or methodfunc:<relative-path>:<name>
classClass, interface, or typeclass:<relative-path>:<name>
moduleLogical module or packagemodule:<name>
conceptAbstract concept or patternconcept:<name>

Edge Types (18 total)

CategoryTypes
Structuralimports, exports, contains, inherits, implements
Behavioralcalls, subscribes, publishes, middleware
Data flowreads_from, writes_to, transforms, validates
Dependenciesdepends_on, tested_by, configures
Semanticrelated, similar_to

Edge Weight Conventions

Edge TypeWeight
contains1.0
inherits, implements0.9
calls, exports0.8
imports0.7
depends_on0.6
tested_by0.5
All others0.5 (default)

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

75.01%
按下载量换算1,550

安全审计

VirusTotal

可疑

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills