Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

tweet-writer推文作者

Agent Skill

tweet-writer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

4,284

周安装

184

GitHub Stars

21

下载量

1,501
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:tweet-writer(推文作者)
来源仓库:https://github.com/sanky369/vibe-building-skills
仓库路径:skills/tweet-writer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/sanky369/vibe-building-skills --skill tweet-writer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/sanky369/vibe-building-skills --skill tweet-writer

简介

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果。

  • 可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。
  • 适用于需要快速获取特定领域信息的研发场景。
  • 支持主流 AI 编程工具集成使用。

SKILL.md

Tweet Writer Skill

Overview

This skill helps you write viral, persuasive tweets and threads optimized for X's algorithm. It combines proven copywriting frameworks, viral hook formulas, and real-time research to model your content after successful examples in your niche.

Keywords: twitter, X, tweets, threads, viral content, social media, engagement, hooks, copywriting

Process Workflow

Phase 1: Niche Research (CRITICAL)

Before writing ANY tweet, you MUST research viral examples in the user's specific niche.

Research Steps:

  1. Identify the niche/topic — What is the user writing about?
  2. Search for viral examples — Use WebSearch to find:

- "[niche] viral tweet examples" - "[niche] twitter thread went viral" - "[topic] best performing tweets" - site:twitter.com OR site:x.com "[niche keyword]" high engagement

  1. Analyze patterns — Extract:

- Hook styles that worked - Content structure - Tone and voice - Specific numbers/results used - CTAs that drove engagement

  1. Document insights — Create a brief analysis before writing

Example Research Prompt:

Searching for: "SaaS founder viral tweets"
              "startup advice twitter thread viral"
              "tech entrepreneur best tweets engagement"

Phase 2: Tweet Creation

Use the frameworks below to craft content modeled after successful examples.


The X Algorithm (2026)

Understanding what the algorithm rewards is critical:

Engagement Hierarchy (Most to Least Valuable)

  1. Replies — Most weighted signal
  2. Quote tweets — High value, shows your content sparks conversation
  3. Bookmarks — Strong signal of value
  4. Retweets — Amplification signal
  5. Likes — Baseline engagement

Time Sensitivity

  • First hour is critical — If you don't gain traction in 60 minutes, reach drops significantly
  • Peak times: 9-11 AM and 7-9 PM EST weekdays, 9-11 AM weekends
  • Fresh content prioritized — X rewards recency

Dwell Time

X tracks how long users spend on your content. Longer = more reach.

  • Threads naturally increase dwell time
  • Visual content keeps eyes on post longer
  • Compelling hooks stop the scroll

Format Boosts

  • Native video: Priority over external links
  • Images/carousels: 2x engagement vs text-only
  • Threads: 3x engagement vs single tweets
  • Polls: High participation signals

What to AVOID

  • External links: Severely penalized (especially for non-Premium accounts)
  • Generic content: No differentiation = no reach
  • Asking for engagement: "Like and RT" hurts reach

Hook Formulas (The Most Critical Element)

Your hook determines 80-90% of your tweet's success. You have ~1 second to stop the scroll.

The Bold Statement

"Nobody talks about this, but..."
"Unpopular opinion: [controversial take]"
"Everything you've been told about [X] is wrong."
"[Common belief] is a myth. Here's the truth:"

The Specific Result

"I [specific result] in [specific timeframe]. Here's how:"
"[Number] [achievement] in [timeframe]. The breakdown:"
"From [bad state] to [good state] in [time]. Thread:"

Example: "I grew from 0 to 50K followers in 90 days. Here's the exact playbook:"

The Curiosity Gap

"I found a [adjective] [topic] hack that no one talks about..."
"The one thing [type of person] gets wrong about [topic]"
"Why most people fail at [X] (and how to fix it)"

The Question Hook

"Want to know the real secret to [X]?"
"What if everything you knew about [X] was wrong?"
"Ever wonder why [common frustration]?"

The Story Hook

"3 years ago I was [bad state]. Today I [good state]."
"I almost quit [X]. Then this happened:"
"The story of how I [achievement] (with $0 budget):"

The Pattern Interrupt

"Everyone says [X]. They're wrong."
"Stop doing [common practice]. Do this instead:"
"Delete [common thing]. Here's why:"

The List Promise

"[Number] [things] that will [benefit] (thread):"
"[Number] lessons from [experience/achievement]:"
"The [number] [category] I wish I knew earlier:"

Example: "7 AI tools that saved me 20+ hours last week:"


Tweet Formats That Go Viral

Format 1: The Listicle (Highest Engagement)

Hook: "[Number] [things] that [benefit]:"

1. [Item] — [Brief explanation]
2. [Item] — [Brief explanation]
...
[CTA or summary]

Format 2: The Contrarian Take

Hook: "[Popular belief] is wrong."

Here's why: [2-3 sentences of reasoning]

What actually works: [Your alternative]

Format 3: The Before/After

[Time period] ago: [Bad state]
Today: [Good state]

The difference? [One key insight]

Format 4: The Framework

Hook: "The [Name] Framework for [Result]:"

Step 1: [Action]
Step 2: [Action]
Step 3: [Action]

[Optional: brief expansion on each]

Format 5: The "Fill in the Blank"

"The most underrated skill for _____ is _____."
"If I could only use one tool for [X], it would be _____."

*Generates massive replies*

Format 6: The Universal Experience

"When you finally [common experience/realization]"
"Why does nobody talk about [shared frustration]?"
"That moment when [relatable situation]"

Thread Structure (7-Tweet Sweet Spot)

Thread Template

Tweet 1 (Hook):

  • Most compelling insight or result
  • Include specific numbers
  • Signal it's a thread: "🧵" or "(thread)"

Tweet 2 (Context):

  • Expand on the hook
  • Set up why this matters
  • Create more curiosity

Tweets 3-6 (Core Value):

  • ONE key insight per tweet
  • Use numbered formatting (1/, 2/, etc.)
  • Add visual breaks every 3-4 tweets (images, charts)
  • Each tweet should be valuable standalone

Tweet 7 (Bridge/Summary):

  • Summarize key takeaways
  • Connect to broader application

Tweet 8 (CTA):

  • Ask a question (generates replies)
  • Quote your first tweet (drives retweets)
  • Direct to profile/newsletter

Thread Writing Rules

  1. Each tweet must earn the next click
  2. No filler — every word must carry weight
  3. Short sentences (under 250 characters per tweet)
  4. "Your words should read like a slippery slope"
  5. Number your tweets (2/12, 3/12, etc.)

Copywriting Frameworks for Tweets

PAS (Problem → Agitate → Solution)

Most reliable formula for engagement

[Problem]: You're [specific situation]
[Agitate]: And it's costing you [consequence]
[Solution]: Here's what works: [your answer]

AIDA (Attention → Interest → Desire → Action)

Best for promotional content

[Attention]: Hook that stops scroll
[Interest]: "Here's what most people don't realize..."
[Desire]: "Imagine if you could [benefit]"
[Action]: "DM me [X] to get started"

BAB (Before → After → Bridge)

Best for transformation stories

[Before]: I was [bad state]
[After]: Now I'm [good state]
[Bridge]: The difference? [Your insight/solution]

Persuasion Principles

Apply these to make any tweet more compelling:

Specificity — "23% increase" beats "big increase"

  • Numbers add credibility
  • Specific timeframes add urgency
  • Details make claims believable

Social Proof — "500+ customers" beats "many customers"

  • Results from real people
  • Numbers of users/followers
  • Recognizable names/brands

Curiosity Gap — Create information asymmetry

  • Hint at valuable info without revealing all
  • Promise specific outcomes
  • Use "Here's what most people miss..."

Controversy — Challenge existing beliefs

  • "Popular opinion is wrong"
  • Contrarian takes get engagement
  • Avoid offensive — aim for thought-provoking

Relatability — Shared experiences resonate

  • "When you realize..."
  • Universal frustrations
  • Common journey points

Growth Hacks

The 30-Day Subtopic Strategy

Pick ONE narrow subtopic in your niche. Post about ONLY that for 30 days straight.

Example: If you're in marketing, focus solely on "email subject lines" for a month.

Result: X's algorithm categorizes you as the authority on that subtopic.

The Reply Strategy

Focus on generating replies over likes/retweets.

  • Ask questions
  • Create fill-in-the-blank tweets
  • Post "hot takes" that invite discussion
  • Algorithm sees you as a conversation starter

The Engagement Window

  • Post 3-5 times daily
  • Engage with 20+ accounts daily (meaningful replies)
  • Reply to comments on your posts within first hour

The 80/20 Rule

  • 80% pure value (no promotion)
  • 20% promotional content
  • Value-first builds trust that converts

Tweet Length Guidelines

  • Single tweets: Under 110 characters perform best
  • Thread tweets: Under 250 characters each
  • Why short works: Easy to scan, room for quote tweets, mobile-optimized

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Too Generic — "Tips for success" → "3 cold email templates that got me 10 meetings this week"

No Hook — Starting with context instead of impact

Asking for Engagement — "Like and RT!" hurts reach

External Links in Main Tweet — Put links in replies instead

No Specific Numbers — "I grew fast" vs "I grew 12,847 followers in 63 days"

Too Salesy — Value ratio too low, feels promotional

No CTA — Thread ends with no clear next step


Execution Checklist

Before posting, verify:

  • Hook stops the scroll (bold/specific/curious)
  • First 7 words earn the rest of the tweet
  • Specific numbers included where relevant
  • Under character limit (110 for single, 250 for thread tweets)
  • No external links in main tweet
  • Clear CTA or engagement driver
  • Posted during peak hours
  • Ready to engage with replies in first hour

How to Use This Skill

When a user asks for help writing tweets:

  1. Ask for context:

- What niche/topic? - What's the goal? (engagement, followers, conversions) - What's the key message/insight? - Any specific results/numbers to include?

  1. Research phase (USE WebSearch):

- Search for viral examples in their niche - Identify successful patterns - Note specific hooks and structures that worked

  1. Draft options:

- Provide 2-3 hook variations - Use appropriate framework (PAS, AIDA, etc.) - Include specific numbers where possible

  1. Optimize:

- Check character count - Strengthen hook - Add engagement driver/CTA

  1. Provide variations:

- Single tweet version - Thread version (if appropriate) - Alternative hooks to test


Integration with Other Skills

Tweet Writer works with:

  • Brand Voice — Ensure tweets match your brand personality
  • Direct Response Copy — Apply persuasion principles
  • Content Atomizer — Turn one tweet into multiple formats
  • SEO Content — Repurpose blog content into threads

Research Sources & Further Reading

Algorithm insights: SocialBee, Tweet Archivist Hook formulas: Ship 30 for 30 Thread templates: Typefully, Legiit Copywriting frameworks: Buffer, Metricool

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

27.54%
按下载量换算413

OpenCode

26%
按下载量换算390

Gemini CLI

17.39%
按下载量换算261

Codex

12.68%
按下载量换算190

Antigravity

8.55%
按下载量换算128

Cursor

3.8%
按下载量换算57

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills