Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
待分类权限需确认github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

test-specialist测试专家

Agent Skill

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

总安装

1,402

周安装

59

GitHub Stars

48

下载量

491
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:test-specialist(测试专家)
来源仓库:https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude
仓库路径:skills/test-specialist
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude --skill test-specialist
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude --skill test-specialist

简介

test-specialist 用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试和回归验证。

  • 适合编写单元测试、端到端测试或根据失败日志定位问题。
  • 使用时需确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据。test-specialist 属于待分类类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 避免为了通过测试而破坏真实逻辑,区分模拟与生产环境。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装并使用。

SKILL.md

name
test-specialist
description
This skill should be used when writing test cases, fixing bugs, analyzing code for potential issues, or improving test coverage for JavaScript/TypeScript applications. Use this for unit tests, integration tests, end-to-end tests, debugging runtime errors, logic bugs, performance issues, security vulnerabilities, and systematic code analysis.

Test Specialist

Systematic testing methodologies and debugging techniques for JS/TS applications.

When to Use

Use for:

  • Writing unit, integration, or E2E tests
  • Fixing bugs and debugging
  • Improving test coverage
  • Analyzing code for potential issues
  • Security and performance testing

Don't use when:

  • Code review → use generic-code-reviewer
  • Technical debt → use tech-debt-analyzer
  • Feature development → use generic-feature-developer

Testing Stack by Project

Project TypeUnit TestsComponentE2E
React/Next.jsVitest/JestTesting LibraryPlaywright
Node.jsVitest/JestSupertestPlaywright
StaticJest-Playwright

Test Patterns

Unit Tests (AAA Pattern)

describe("calculateTotal", () => {
  test("sums amounts correctly", () => {
    // Arrange
    const items = [{ amount: 100 }, { amount: 50 }];
    // Act
    const total = calculateTotal(items);
    // Assert
    expect(total).toBe(150);
  });

  test("handles empty list", () => {
    expect(calculateTotal([])).toBe(0);
  });
});

Component Tests (User Behavior)

// ✅ Test user behavior, not implementation
it('creates item when user clicks Add', async () => {
  const user = userEvent.setup();
  render(<ItemList />);

  await user.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /add/i }));
  await user.type(screen.getByLabelText(/title/i), 'New item');
  await user.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /save/i }));

  expect(screen.getByText('New item')).toBeInTheDocument();
});

E2E Tests (Playwright)

import { test, expect } from "@playwright/test";

test("user can complete checkout", async ({ page }) => {
  await page.goto("/products");

  // Add to cart
  await page.click('button:has-text("Add to Cart")');
  await page.click('a:has-text("Cart")');

  // Checkout
  await page.click('button:has-text("Checkout")');
  await page.fill('[name="email"]', " [email protected] ");
  await page.click('button:has-text("Place Order")');

  // Verify
  await expect(page.locator("h1")).toContainText("Order Confirmed");
});

Integration Tests

test("POST /items creates item", async () => {
  const response = await request(app)
    .post("/api/items")
    .send({ name: "Test" })
    .expect(201);

  expect(response.body).toMatchObject({ id: expect.any(Number) });
});

Bug Analysis Process

  1. Reproduce - Document exact steps, expected vs actual
  2. Isolate - Binary search, minimal reproduction
  3. Root Cause - Trace execution, check assumptions, git blame
  4. Fix - Write failing test first, implement fix
  5. Validate - Run full suite, test edge cases

Debugging Checklist

When debugging an issue:

  • [ ] Can reproduce consistently
  • [ ] Minimal reproduction created
  • [ ] Console/network logs checked
  • [ ] State at failure point inspected
  • [ ] Git blame checked for recent changes
  • [ ] Failing test written before fix

Common Bug Patterns

Race Conditions

test("handles concurrent updates", async () => {
  const promises = Array.from({ length: 100 }, () => increment());
  await Promise.all(promises);
  expect(getCount()).toBe(100);
});

Null Safety

test.each([null, undefined, "", 0])("handles invalid input: %p", (input) => {
  expect(() => process(input)).toThrow("Invalid");
});

Boundary Values

test("handles edge cases", () => {
  expect(paginate([], 1, 10)).toEqual([]); // empty
  expect(paginate([item], 1, 10)).toEqual([item]); // single
  expect(paginate(items25, 3, 10)).toHaveLength(5); // partial last page
});

Security Tests

test("prevents SQL injection", async () => {
  const malicious = "'; DROP TABLE users; --";
  await expect(search(malicious)).resolves.not.toThrow();
});

test("sanitizes XSS", () => {
  const xss = '<script>alert("xss")</script>';
  expect(sanitize(xss)).not.toContain("<script>");
});

test("requires auth", async () => {
  await request(app).post("/api/items").expect(401);
});

Performance Tests

test("handles large datasets efficiently", () => {
  const largeList = Array.from({ length: 10000 }, (_, i) => ({ value: i }));
  const start = performance.now();
  process(largeList);
  expect(performance.now() - start).toBeLessThan(100);
});

Coverage Targets

Code TypeTarget
Critical paths90%+
Business logic85%+
UI components75%+
Utilities70%+

Test Quality Principles

  1. One behavior per test
  2. Descriptive names - test names explain scenario
  3. Independent tests - no shared state
  4. Cover edge cases - null, empty, boundaries, errors
  5. Mock external deps - tests should be fast
  6. Test behavior - not implementation details

Workflow Decision Tree

SituationAction
Adding featureWrite test first (TDD)
Fixing bugWrite failing test, then fix
Improving coverageFind gaps, prioritize critical paths
Code reviewCheck edge cases, error handling

See Also

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.63%
按下载量换算180

Claude

26.83%
按下载量换算132

Cursor

18.07%
按下载量换算89

Gemini CLI

9.45%
按下载量换算46

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限需确认

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills