Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

trae-agent-writer特工作家

Agent Skill

trae-agent-writer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

710

周安装

29

GitHub Stars

1

下载量

227
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:trae-agent-writer(特工作家)
来源仓库:https://github.com/learnwy/skills
仓库路径:skills/trae-agent-writer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/learnwy/skills --skill trae-agent-writer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/learnwy/skills --skill trae-agent-writer

简介

用于辅助撰写与 Trae 相关的技术文章、教程或产品说明。

  • 适合在内容创作、知识沉淀或用户指南编写时使用。
  • 可基于关键词或主题快速检索候选素材与结构建议。
  • 安装前请核实是否会执行命令或访问外部资源。
  • 建议参考来源仓库了解功能细节与更新状态。trae-agent-writer 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Trae Agent Writer

Create agent definitions for independent, isolated execution with business context.

What is an Agent?

  • Spawned as subagents - Run with isolated context
  • Single-purpose - One agent, one job
  • Stateless - No memory between invocations
  • Composable - Orchestrated by parent agents/skills

Phase 1: Understand Project (REQUIRED)

Before creating ANY agent, understand the context first.

1.1 Check Scope

If project is too large:

  • ASK - What specific task needs an agent?
  • SCOPE - Focus on one isolated task

1.2 Scan Existing Patterns

Quick scan to understand what exists (NOT deep reading):

1. Check if agents/ directory exists
2. List existing agents (names only)
3. Note invocation patterns used

Note: Deep reading of existing agents happens in Phase 2 when creating similar ones.

1.3 Understand Business

Agents need domain knowledge to make decisions:

Agent TypeBusiness Context Needed
GraderWhat makes output "good"?
AnalyzerWhat patterns matter?
ValidatorWhat business rules apply?

Ask: "What criteria should this agent use?"

Phase 2: Create Agents (SEQUENTIAL)

Create agents ONE at a time.

2.1 Plan Agent Breakdown

First, identify what agents are needed:

Example: code-review skill
├── review-grader.md    (grade review quality)
├── code-comparator.md  (compare two versions)
└── issue-analyzer.md   (analyze patterns)

2.2 For EACH Agent

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  For each agent:                            │
│                                             │
│  0. Initialize from template via script     │
│     - Run scripts/init_agent.py             │
│     - Edit generated scaffold               │
│                                             │
│  1. Define role clearly                     │
│     - Single purpose                        │
│     - What makes it need isolation?         │
│                                             │
│  2. Specify inputs/outputs                  │
│     - All parameters documented             │
│     - Structured output format              │
│                                             │
│  3. Write process steps                     │
│     - Numbered, clear steps                 │
│     - Include business rules                │
│                                             │
│  4. Move to next agent                      │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Initialization command:

python {skill_dir}/scripts/init_agent.py \
  --skill-dir {skill_dir} \
  --name {agent_name} \
  --role "One-line role" \
  --output-dir {project_root}/agents

2.3 Agent Format

# {Agent Name} Agent

{One-sentence role}

## Role

{What this agent does and why it needs isolation}

## What This Agent Should NOT Do

- ❌ **Do NOT {negative_action_1}** - {explanation}
- ❌ **Do NOT {negative_action_2}** - {explanation}
- ❌ **Do NOT {negative_action_3}** - {explanation}
- ❌ **Do NOT run commands or modify files** - Stay strictly read-only (unless explicitly a writer agent)
- ✅ **Only output**: {list_allowed_outputs}

## Inputs

- **param_name**: Description
- **output_path**: Where to save results

## Process

### Step 1: {Action}
1. Do this
2. Then this

### Step N: Write Results
Save to `{output_path}`.

## Output Format

{JSON structure}

## Guidelines

- **Be objective**: Avoid bias
- **Cite evidence**: Quote specific text

Phase 3: Quality & Lessons Learned

⚠️ Common Mistakes (CRITICAL)

These mistakes break agents. Always check:

Wrong ❌Correct ✅Why
/Users/john/project/src/src/NO absolute paths!
/home/dev/output/output/ or use {output_path} paramPaths from project root
agent.mdreview-grader.mdDescriptive names
Mixed 中英文Single languageConfuses AI
Missing inputsDocument all paramsAgent needs context

Path Rule: Use relative paths like src/file.ts. For dynamic paths, use input parameters like {output_path}.

Quality Checklist

Before creating each agent:

  • Paths - Use placeholders, no absolute paths
  • Naming - Descriptive, action-oriented
  • Language - Single language throughout
  • Role - Clear single purpose
  • Negative Constraints - "What This Agent Should NOT Do" section included
  • Inputs - All parameters documented
  • Output - Structured format defined
  • Business - Includes domain context

Best Practices

Naming

Good ✅Bad ❌
review-grader.mdagent.md
code-comparator.mdhelper.md
app-analyzer.mdscanner.md

Agent Locations

LocationUse Case
skill-name/agents/Inside skills
.trae/agents/Project-level
~/.trae/agents/Global

Good Agent Candidates

PatternWhy Agent?
GraderNeeds objectivity
ComparatorBlind comparison
AnalyzerDeep dive, isolated
TransformerParallel processing

Don't make agents for: Simple inline tasks, tasks needing conversation history.

Example

User: "Create agent to grade code reviews"

Phase 1: Understand
- Purpose: Evaluate reviews objectively
- Needs isolation: Prevent bias
- Criteria: completeness, accuracy

Phase 2: Create

📄 agents/review-grader.md

# Review Grader Agent

Grade code reviews against quality expectations.

## Role

Assess reviews for completeness, accuracy, helpfulness.
Operates blindly to prevent bias.

## Inputs

- **review_path**: Path to review file
- **expectations**: List of expected findings
- **output_path**: Where to save grading.json

## Process

### Step 1: Read Review
1. Read review file
2. Extract all claims

### Step 2: Check Expectations
For each expectation:
1. Search for evidence
2. Mark PASS/FAIL
3. Cite specific text

### Step 3: Write Results
Save to `{output_path}/grading.json`

## Output Format

{
  "expectations": [
    {"text": "...", "passed": true, "evidence": "..."}
  ],
  "pass_rate": 0.80
}

## Guidelines

- **Be objective**: Don't favor verbose or brief
- **Cite evidence**: Quote specific text

Phase 3: Verify agent can be invoked

References

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude

31.74%
按下载量换算72

Codex

31.18%
按下载量换算71

Cursor

18.13%
按下载量换算41

Gemini CLI

9.72%
按下载量换算22

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills