Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

track-session跟踪会话

Agent Skill

track-session 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

906

周安装

37

GitHub Stars

2

下载量

290
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:track-session(跟踪会话)
来源仓库:https://github.com/antjanus/skillbox
仓库路径:skills/track-session
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/antjanus/skillbox --skill track-session
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/antjanus/skillbox --skill track-session

简介

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。

  • 适合在需要快速定位关键词或任务场景时使用。
  • 可结合来源仓库和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。
  • 安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/antjanus/skillbox --skill track-session
  • 建议确认权限范围和是否执行命令后再使用

SKILL.md

Session Progress

🔄 Session tracking activated - I'll use SESSION_PROGRESS.md to track our work so we can pause and resume anytime.

Overview

Use SESSION_PROGRESS.md in the project root to track plans and progress. All planned work should be saved to SESSION_PROGRESS.md and updated over time. If the plan changes, update SESSION_PROGRESS.

Core principle: Maintain recoverable state so work can pause and resume without losing context.

Usage Modes

This skill supports four modes via optional arguments:

ModeCommandWhat it doesUse when
Resume/track-session resumeLoad SESSION_PROGRESS.md and continueReturning to a project, picking up where you left off
Default/track-sessionSave progress, then continue workingCheckpoint during active work
Save/track-session saveSave progress and stopPausing work or taking a break
Verify/track-session verifyValidate completed work against requirementsBefore declaring done or delivery

When to Use

Always use when:

  • Working on multi-phase implementations
  • Planning complex refactoring across multiple files
  • Pairing with user on design decisions
  • Tasks that might span multiple sessions or context resets
  • Long-running debugging sessions with multiple approaches

Useful for:

  • Feature development with dependencies between tasks
  • Large refactoring projects
  • Learning new codebases with exploration notes
  • Collaborative work sessions with progress tracking

Avoid when:

  • Quick 1-2 file changes
  • Simple bug fixes with obvious solutions
  • Read-only exploration without planned changes
  • Tasks that complete in under 5 minutes

When to Update

Update after:

  • Completing any checklist item
  • Any change in plan
  • Any error or failed attempt
  • Every 2-3 file modifications
  • Before asking user questions

When to Verify

Run verification:

  • Before declaring work complete
  • After all planned tasks are checked off
  • Before final delivery or handoff
  • When returning to work after a long break (verify nothing regressed)
  • After major refactoring (verify functionality preserved)
  • When user asks "are we done?" or "did we finish everything?"

Format

---
schema: cc-dash/session@1
project: project-name-here
session_id: s_YYYY-MM-DD_topic-slug
roadmap_ref: r_XXXXX
started: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS-TZ
last_updated: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS-TZ
status: in-progress
---

# Session Progress

## Plan

- [ ] <!-- id:t_XXXXX dep:none --> Task 1: Description
- [x] <!-- id:t_XXXXX dep:t_XXXXX --> Task 2: Description
- [ ] <!-- id:t_XXXXX dep:t_XXXXX --> Task 3: Description

## Current Status

Last updated: [timestamp]
Working on: [current task]
Next: [immediate next step]

## Decisions

- [decision description]

## Failed Attempts

- <!-- id:f_XXXXX task:t_XXXXX --> Tried [approach]: Failed because [reason], trying [alternative] instead

## Completed Work

- <!-- ref:t_XXXXX at:YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS-TZ --> Task 2: [brief summary of what was done]

## Verification Results

(Added by /track-session verify command)

### Successfully Verified

- Task/Phase: Evidence of completion and correctness

### Minor Issues Found

- Issue: Description and impact

### Blocking Issues

- Critical problem: What's broken and why it blocks delivery

Format Rules

  1. Frontmatter is required - Must include schema, project, session_id, started, last_updated, status
  2. Every plan item gets an ID - Format: t_ + 5 random alphanumeric characters
  3. Every plan item declares dependencies - dep:t_XXXXX or dep:none
  4. roadmap_ref links to the roadmap - Set when session implements a specific roadmap feature
  5. Checkboxes are the primary status - [] = not done, [x] = done
  6. Failed attempts reference tasks - task:t_XXXXX links the failure to what was being attempted
  7. Completed work references tasks - ref:t_XXXXX at:timestamp for traceability
  8. Session status in frontmatter - in-progress, paused, completed, or blocked

ID Generation

Generate IDs using 5 random characters from [a-z0-9]. Prefixes:

  • t_ = task (plan items)
  • f_ = failed attempt
  • s_ = session (in session_id, uses date + slug instead of random)

Migration from v1

If you encounter a SESSION_PROGRESS.md without frontmatter or IDs, see the Migration Guide for step-by-step instructions on upgrading to v2 format.

Verification

Command: /track-session verify

Validates completed tasks against original requirements. Checks that work is actually done, requirements met, dependencies satisfied, no scope gaps. Generates report with verified items, minor issues, blockers, and next steps.

See: Detailed Verification Guide for full methodology.

Rules

  1. Never repeat failures - Log every failed approach with reason
  2. Resume from checkpoint - Check for existing SESSION_PROGRESS.md at session start
  3. Keep current - File should always reflect actual state
  4. Be specific - Include enough detail to resume work after context loss
  5. Verify before declaring done - Always run /track-session verify before claiming work is complete
  6. Verification is not optional - Checked boxes don't mean work meets requirements; verification does

Examples

Example: Mode Selection

Scenario 2: Taking a lunch break

user: "Save my progress, I'll be back in an hour" assistant: "/track-session save"

Saves current state and stops

Scenario 3: Coming back from break

user: "I'm back, let's continue" assistant: "/track-session resume"

Reads SESSION_PROGRESS.md and continues from checkpoint

Scenario 4: Creating checkpoint mid-work

assistant: "Completed Phase 2, creating checkpoint before Phase 3" assistant: "/track-session"

Updates SESSION_PROGRESS.md with Phase 2 completion, continues to Phase 3

Scenario 5: Verifying work is complete

user: "Are we done? Did we complete everything?" assistant: "/track-session verify"

Reads SESSION_PROGRESS.md, checks all completed tasks against requirements

Reports: "✅ Phases 1-3 verified. ⚠️ Phase 4 tests not run. Recommend: Run test suite"

Scenario 6: End of work session verification

assistant: "All tasks appear complete. Let me verify before we finish." assistant: "/track-session verify"

Validates all work, generates verification report

**Why this is good:** Clear separation of concerns - save for pausing, resume for continuing, no-arg for checkpointing during active work, verify for validation before delivery.
</Good>

<Bad>

Always using save even when you want to continue

user: "Let's build authentication" assistant: "/track-session save"

Saves and STOPS, now user has to manually ask to resume

Using resume without a saved session

user: "Start working on the feature" assistant: "/track-session resume"

ERROR: No SESSION_PROGRESS.md exists yet

Marking tasks complete without verification

assistant: "All tasks are checked off, we're done!"

Never ran verify to confirm work actually meets requirements


**Why this is bad:** Using save when you want to continue wastes time. Using resume without prior save fails. Skipping verify means potentially incomplete or incorrect work. Use no-arg mode to save+continue, and always verify before declaring completion.

### Example 1: Complex Feature Implementation

# Session Progress

## Plan

- Phase 1: Research authentication libraries
  - Evaluated OAuth.js, Passport.js, Auth0
  - Chose Passport.js for flexibility
- Phase 2: Set up OAuth flow
  - Configured Google OAuth provider
  - Added callback routes
- Phase 3: Add user session management
  - Implement Redis session store
  - Add session cleanup job
- Phase 4: Test authentication flows
  - Test login/logout
  - Test session persistence

## Current Status

Working on: Phase 3 - Implementing Redis session storage Next: Add Redis client configuration, then implement session middleware

## Failed Attempts

- -
## Completed Work

- -

Why this is good: Frontmatter with schema and session metadata, specific tasks with IDs and explicit dependencies, failed attempts linked to tasks, completed work with timestamps and task references, concrete next steps. </Good>

<Bad>

# Session Progress

## Plan
- [ ] Do auth stuff
- [ ] Fix sessions
- [ ] Test it

Working on auth. Tried some things that didn't work.

Why this is bad: Too vague, no dependencies tracked, no details on what failed or why, impossible to resume without starting over.

Example 2: Debugging Session

Session Progress

Plan

  • Phase 1: Reproduce bug
  • Phase 2: Identify root cause
  • Phase 3: Implement fix
  • Phase 4: Verify fix with tests

Current Status

Working on: Phase 3 - Implementing race condition fix Next: Add mutex lock around shared resource access in payment processor

Failed Attempts

  • - -

Completed Work

  • -
**Why this is good:** Clear progression through debugging phases, failed attempts linked to tasks with IDs, root cause documented, frontmatter tracks session metadata.
</Good>

<Bad>

Session Progress

Debugging payment bug. Tried a few things. Need to fix it.


**Why this is bad:** No systematic approach, no record of what was tried, no hypothesis tracking.

### Example 3: Verification Workflow

# Session Progress

## Plan

- Phase 1: Set up authentication system
- Phase 2: Implement user registration
- Phase 3: Add email verification
- Phase 4: Write tests

## Verification Results

### Successfully Verified

- All phases verified with passing tests (23/23)

### Minor Issues Found

- Email template styling needs polish, no rate limiting on registration endpoint

### Blocking Issues

- None

Why this is good: Verification report uses plain headings (no emojis), shows evidence (test counts, specific issues), separates critical vs. nice-to-have, frontmatter shows session is completed. </Good>

<Bad>

## Plan
- [x] Phase 1: Authentication
- [x] Phase 2: Registration
- [x] Phase 3: Email stuff
- [x] Phase 4: Tests

Everything is done! ✨

Why this is bad: No verification performed, no evidence work meets requirements, potentially incomplete work.

Quality Signals

A well-tracked session has these properties:

  • Frontmatter has schema, project, session_id, and timestamps — machine-parseable for dashboard ingestion
  • Every task has an ID and explicit dependencydep:none or dep:t_XXXXX, never omitted
  • "Current Status" reflects actual state — updated within the last 2-3 file modifications
  • Failed attempts reference the task they belong to — with a clear reason why it failed
  • "Next" field names specific files and functions — not just "fix the bug"
  • Completed work has timestampsref:t_XXXXX at:timestamp for traceability

Troubleshooting

Problem: Lost track of what was being worked on

Cause: Didn't update "Current Status" before pausing session.

Solution:

  • Update SESSION_PROGRESS.md before asking user questions
  • Update before context resets
  • Update every 2-3 file modifications
  • Set reminder: "Last updated" timestamp should be recent

Problem: Can't resume work after long break

Cause: Not enough detail in "Next" field.

Solution: Include specific next action with file and function names:

Next: Add mutex lock in src/payment/processor.ts:handlePayment()
around lines 45-60 where paymentState is accessed

Not just: "Next: Fix the bug"

Problem: Resume fails with "No SESSION_PROGRESS.md found"

Cause: Trying to resume without first saving a session.

Solution:

  • Use /track-session (no argument) to create initial session
  • Or use /track-session save to create SESSION_PROGRESS.md first
  • Resume only works when SESSION_PROGRESS.md already exists

Problem: Unclear which mode to use

Cause: Not understanding the difference between modes.

Solution: Quick decision guide:

  • Continuing work? Use no argument (default)
  • Stopping for a break? Use save
  • Coming back to work? Use resume
  • Think you're done? Use verify

Extended Troubleshooting — File size management, repeated failures, verify edge cases, and more.

Integration

This skill works with:

  • git-worktree - Each worktree should have its own SESSION_PROGRESS.md for parallel work tracking
  • All methodology skills - Track phase completion for TDD, debugging, code review workflows
  • generate-skill - Use SESSION_PROGRESS.md to track multi-phase skill creation
  • Long-running tasks - Any task requiring >15 minutes or multiple context resets

Integration pattern with git-worktree:

# Create worktree for feature
git worktree add ../project-feature feature-branch
cd ../project-feature

# Create separate progress tracking
echo "# Session Progress - Feature Branch" > SESSION_PROGRESS.md
# Work on feature with independent progress tracking

Pairs with:

  • Commit workflows - Track progress between commits
  • Testing workflows - Track test implementation phases
  • Refactoring - Track refactoring phases and rollback points

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.15%
按下载量换算102

Claude

29.45%
按下载量换算85

Cursor

18.24%
按下载量换算53

Gemini CLI

8.54%
按下载量换算25

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills