Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

thesis-conclusion-writer论文结论作者

Agent Skill

thesis-conclusion-writer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,599

周安装

68

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

560
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:thesis-conclusion-writer(论文结论作者)
来源仓库:https://github.com/junwugit/thesis-conclusion-writer
安装命令:
openclaw skills install thesis-conclusion-writer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install thesis-conclusion-writer

简介

thesis-conclusion-writer 生成学位论文结论章节的专业文稿。

  • 总结研究发现并指出理论贡献与实践意义。thesis-conclusion-writer 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 避免重复引言内容,突出成果边界与未来方向。
  • 支持中文与英文双语输出,适配不同期刊要求。
  • 需结合原始数据谨慎表述,防止夸大研究成果。

SKILL.md

name
thesis-conclusion-writer
description
Write detailed, academically rigorous Conclusion sections or final conclusion chapters for theses, dissertations, undergraduate papers, graduation theses, journal-style papers, and research reports from a user's complete thesis, abstract, results, discussion, findings, contribution, limitations, and future-research information. Use when users ask to write, draft, expand, polish, or structure only the Conclusion/Conclusions/结论/研究结论/结论与展望 section. Default to the same dominant language as the thesis unless the user requests another language.

Thesis Conclusion Writer

Scope

Use this skill only to write the conclusion part of a thesis or academic paper. The default output is a polished "结论", "研究结论", "结论与展望", or English "Conclusion/Conclusions" section based on the user's supplied thesis.

Do not write a new introduction, literature review, methodology, results chapter, or full discussion chapter. The conclusion should synthesize the study's outcome and take-home message; it should not introduce new data, new literature, new analysis, or unsupported claims.

Required Reference

Before drafting a full conclusion section, read references/conclusion-writing-guide.md. It contains conclusion structures, the generic conclusion model, language rules, contribution-ownership rules, Chinese and English templates, and quality checks derived from the local 8conclusion.txt source.

Input Extraction

Extract and use any information the user provides:

  • Complete thesis text, abstract, or chapter excerpts
  • Thesis title, discipline, degree level, school format, and target language
  • Research problem, aim, gap, theoretical framework, research questions, hypotheses, variables, concepts, or themes
  • Method or approach, only as much as needed to identify what the study did
  • Key results, findings, supported/unsupported hypotheses, qualitative themes, or case conclusions
  • Discussion points, contribution, practical implications, applications, limitations, and future research
  • Required conclusion length, heading style, and whether the school expects "研究结论", "创新点", "不足与展望", or "建议"

If the user provides no findings or only a title, do not invent conclusions. Produce a conclusion framework with placeholders and list the exact thesis materials needed.

Conclusion Type Decision

Infer the conclusion format before writing:

  • Short conclusion: one to three paragraphs, suitable for article-style papers or when the discussion already contains limitations and implications.
  • Thesis conclusion chapter: a longer final section/chapter with research conclusions, contribution, implications, limitations, and future directions.
  • Undergraduate Chinese conclusion: concise and concrete, usually including "研究结论", "实践启示/研究意义", and "不足与展望".
  • Empirical quantitative conclusion: answer each research question or hypothesis using defensible conclusion statements.
  • Qualitative conclusion: synthesize themes, experience patterns, theoretical insight, transferability, and contextual limits.
  • Intervention-scheme design conclusion: summarize the designed scheme and its theoretical/practical value; do not claim effectiveness without implementation data.
  • Literature-review conclusion: synthesize evidence patterns, main gaps, and future research directions.

Drafting Workflow

  1. Determine the thesis language and use that language unless the user requests otherwise.
  2. Identify the conclusion type and school heading requirements.
  3. Extract the study's main achievement and take-home message from the whole thesis, not only the abstract.
  4. Select relevant conclusion components: what the paper did, what it achieved, key findings, implications, limitations, applications, contribution, and future directions.
  5. Convert results into conclusion statements that answer the research questions without repeating detailed statistics or raw data.
  6. Make the study's own contribution explicit using phrases such as "本研究发现", "本文表明", "This study shows", or "The present thesis demonstrates".
  7. Keep conclusions proportional to the evidence, sample, method, and design.
  8. End with a clear closing sentence that states the study's overall value and remaining direction.

Output Standards

For a full conclusion section, include:

  • Complete conclusion text with appropriate numbered headings when needed
  • Main research conclusions derived from findings
  • Explicit take-home message
  • Contribution or advancement of knowledge/practice when supported
  • Practical application or implication when appropriate
  • Limitations and future directions if the target format includes them
  • Same language as the thesis unless otherwise requested

Quality requirements:

  • Do not fabricate findings, data, citations, applications, or future work.
  • Do not copy the abstract; use the thesis as the source and synthesize.
  • Do not overstate causality, generalizability, or effectiveness.
  • Do not introduce new evidence in the conclusion.
  • Do not simply summarize chapter contents; state what the study has established.
  • Keep the conclusion explicit enough for readers who skip directly from title or abstract to conclusion.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

98.27%
按下载量换算550

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills