Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
运维和基础设施需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

testing-chaos测试混乱

Agent Skill

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

总安装

576

周安装

24

GitHub Stars

1

下载量

192
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:testing-chaos(测试混乱)
来源仓库:https://github.com/wojons/skills
仓库路径:skills/testing-chaos
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/wojons/skills --skill testing-chaos
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/wojons/skills --skill testing-chaos

简介

用于模拟系统故障场景下的容错与高可用能力。

  • 适合验证服务降级、重试机制和资源隔离效果。
  • 支持网络延迟、进程终止等典型混沌实验设计。
  • 需在受控环境中执行以避免对生产造成冲击。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。
  • testing-chaos 属于运维和基础设施类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Chaos Testing

Run chaos engineering experiments to build resilient systems by intentionally injecting failures and observing system behavior.

When to use me

Use this skill when:

  • Building highly available and resilient systems
  • Testing failure recovery and auto-remediation
  • Validating disaster recovery plans
  • Ensuring graceful degradation under stress
  • Testing monitoring and alerting systems
  • Building confidence in production resilience
  • Preparing for unexpected failure scenarios

What I do

  • Failure injection experiments:

- Network latency and packet loss - Service dependency failures - Resource exhaustion (CPU, memory, disk) - Database connection failures - Third-party API outages

  • Resilience validation:

- Circuit breaker pattern testing - Retry and backoff strategy validation - Fallback and default behavior testing - Load shedding and rate limiting - Failover and redundancy testing

  • Coordination with other testing:

- Builds on performance and load testing - Complements disaster recovery testing - Informs reliability and availability testing - Validates monitoring and observability

  • Experiment design:

- Hypothesis-driven experimentation - Blast radius containment - Progressive fault injection - Automated experiment orchestration

Examples

# Chaos engineering tools
npm run test:chaos:start           # Start chaos experiments
npm run test:chaos:stop            # Stop all chaos experiments
npm run test:chaos:status          # Check experiment status

# Specific failure injections
npm run test:chaos:network         # Network failure injection
npm run test:chaos:service         # Service dependency failures
npm run test:chaos:resource        # Resource exhaustion
npm run test:chaos:database        # Database failures

# Integration with other tests
npm run test:performance -- --chaos # Performance under failure
npm run test:reliability -- --chaos # Reliability with faults

# Experiment scenarios
npm run test:chaos:scenario:api-outage      # API dependency outage
npm run test:chaos:scenario:db-failover     # Database failover
npm run test:chaos:scenario:latency-spike   # Network latency spike
npm run test:chaos:scenario:memory-leak     # Memory pressure

# Safety controls
npm run test:chaos:safety-check    # Pre-experiment safety check
npm run test:chaos:rollback        # Emergency rollback

Output format

Chaos Test Results:
──────────────────────────────
Experiment: Database Primary Node Failure
Hypothesis: System will failover to replica within 30 seconds
Blast Radius: Staging environment, canary deployment
Duration: 15 minutes

Experiment Execution:
  1. Baseline metrics collected
  2. Database primary node terminated (simulated)
  3. System behavior observed for 10 minutes
  4. Metrics compared to baseline

Results:
  ✅ Failover Time: 22 seconds (within 30s target)
  ✅ Data Consistency: No data loss detected
  ✅ User Impact: 15% error rate during failover (acceptable)
  ✅ Recovery: Automatic, no manual intervention required
  ✅ Monitoring: Alerts triggered within 45 seconds

System Behavior Under Failure:
  - API response time increased from 150ms to 850ms during failover
  - Error rate spiked to 15% for 45 seconds
  - Read-only operations continued uninterrupted
  - Write operations queued and retried successfully

Integration with Other Testing:
  - Performance testing: Established baseline for comparison
  - Reliability testing: Validated MTTR (Mean Time To Recovery)
  - Monitoring testing: Alert effectiveness verified
  - Disaster recovery: Automated failover confirmed

Safety Controls:
  - Automatic rollback on critical failure thresholds
  - Manual abort available throughout
  - Canary deployment limited impact
  - Post-experiment verification passed

Lessons Learned:
  1. Need to improve connection pooling during failover
  2. Alert thresholds should be adjusted for transient failures
  3. User-facing error messages during failover need improvement
  4. Database health checks could be more frequent

Recommendation:
  - System demonstrates good resilience to database failures
  - Implement suggested improvements from lessons learned
  - Schedule regular chaos experiments (monthly)
  - Expand blast radius gradually as confidence increases

Notes

  • Start with small, controlled experiments
  • Always have a rollback plan and automatic abort mechanisms
  • Test in staging before production
  • Document hypotheses and validate outcomes
  • Use feature flags to control chaos injection
  • Monitor system metrics closely during experiments
  • Learn from failures and improve system design
  • Chaos testing complements, doesn't replace, other testing
  • Consider business impact and schedule experiments appropriately
  • Build a culture of resilience, not just technical fixes

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude

34.44%
按下载量换算66

Codex

33.86%
按下载量换算65

Cursor

19.5%
按下载量换算37

Gemini CLI

9%
按下载量换算17

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills