Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
前端设计操作浏览器github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

test-scaffolding测试脚手架

Agent Skill

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

总安装

346

周安装

14

GitHub Stars

8

下载量

109
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:test-scaffolding(测试脚手架)
来源仓库:https://github.com/kanopi/cms-cultivator
仓库路径:skills/test-scaffolding
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/kanopi/cms-cultivator --skill test-scaffolding
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/kanopi/cms-cultivator --skill test-scaffolding

简介

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。

  • 适合编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。
  • 使用时需确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免修改真实逻辑。
  • 涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。
  • 安装方式:通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库添加。

SKILL.md

Test Scaffolding Generator

Automatically generate test scaffolding for untested code.

Testing Philosophy

Good tests are an investment, not a cost.

Core Beliefs

  1. Tests as Documentation: Tests show how code should be used
  2. Fast Feedback: Quick tests enable rapid development
  3. Confidence to Refactor: Good test coverage allows safe changes
  4. Regression Prevention: Tests catch bugs before production

Scope Balance

  • Quick scaffolding (this skill): Fast test generation for single classes/functions
  • Comprehensive suites (/test-generate command): Full project test coverage with test plans
  • Manual refinement: Human review adds edge cases and business logic validation (essential for quality)

This skill provides rapid test scaffolding. For complete coverage, use comprehensive test generation + manual refinement.

When to Use This Skill

Activate this skill when the user:

  • Shows new code and says "I need tests for this"
  • Asks "how do I test this?"
  • Mentions "no tests yet" or "untested code"
  • Says "I should write tests" or "need test coverage"
  • Shows a class/function and asks about testing
  • Mentions specific test types: "unit test", "integration test", "e2e test"

Decision Framework

Before generating test scaffolding, determine:

What Type of Code Is This?

  1. Business logic function → Unit test (fast, isolated)
  2. Class with dependencies → Unit test with mocks/stubs
  3. API endpoint → Integration test (test with real dependencies)
  4. UI component → Component test (render, interactions)
  5. User flow → E2E test (full browser simulation)

What Test Framework?

PHP (Drupal/WordPress):

  • PHPUnit for unit and integration tests
  • Drupal Kernel tests for module testing
  • WordPress test framework for plugins/themes

JavaScript:

  • Jest for unit and component tests
  • Cypress for E2E tests
  • React Testing Library for React components

What Should Be Tested?

Unit tests (highest priority):

  • Happy path - Expected behavior with valid input
  • Edge cases - Boundary conditions (empty, null, zero, max)
  • Error handling - Invalid input, exceptions
  • Business logic - Calculations, transformations, decisions

Don't test (waste of time):

  • ❌ Framework code (it's already tested)
  • ❌ Simple getters/setters (no logic)
  • ❌ Third-party libraries (trust their tests)

What Dependencies Need Mocking?

Mock/stub:

  • ✅ External APIs (use fixtures instead)
  • ✅ Database queries (use test database or mocks)
  • ✅ File system operations (use virtual filesystem)
  • ✅ Time-dependent code (mock date/time)

Don't mock:

  • ❌ Code under test
  • ❌ Simple data structures
  • ❌ Pure functions

What Test Coverage Is Appropriate?

Critical code (90%+ coverage target):

  • Authentication/authorization
  • Payment processing
  • Data writes/deletes
  • Security-sensitive operations

Standard code (70-80% coverage target):

  • Business logic
  • API endpoints
  • Public interfaces

Low priority (minimal coverage ok):

  • Getters/setters
  • Configuration
  • UI styling

What Test Structure?

AAA pattern (standard):

  1. Arrange - Set up test data and mocks
  2. Act - Execute the code under test
  3. Assert - Verify expected outcomes

Test name convention:

  • test_methodName_scenario_expectedBehavior()
  • Example: test_calculateTotal_withDiscount_returnsReducedPrice()

Decision Tree

User requests tests for code
    ↓
Analyze code type (function/class/endpoint/UI)
    ↓
Determine test type (unit/integration/e2e)
    ↓
Identify framework (PHPUnit/Jest/Cypress)
    ↓
Determine what to test (happy/edge/error)
    ↓
Identify dependencies to mock
    ↓
Generate test scaffolding with descriptive names
    ↓
Include AAA structure comments

Workflow

1. Analyze the Code to Test

Identify:

  • Class name and namespace
  • Methods to test (public methods)
  • Dependencies (constructor parameters)
  • Return types
  • Drupal vs WordPress context

2. Determine Test Type

Unit Tests - For isolated logic:

  • Services with minimal dependencies
  • Utility functions
  • Data transformation
  • Business logic

Integration Tests - For component interaction:

  • Controllers with database
  • Form handlers
  • API endpoints
  • Complex workflows

E2E Tests - For user workflows:

  • Login/authentication
  • Multi-step forms
  • Content creation
  • Admin interfaces

3. Generate Appropriate Test Scaffold

Test Templates

Complete test templates are available for reference:

Use these templates as starting points, adapting for the specific code being tested.

Generation Strategy

1. Start Simple

Generate basic test structure first:

  • Test class/describe block
  • Setup/teardown methods
  • One or two simple test cases

2. Identify Test Cases

For each public method:

  • Happy path (valid input → expected output)
  • Error cases (invalid input → exception)
  • Edge cases (empty, null, boundary values)
  • State changes (before/after verification)

3. Mock Dependencies

Identify what needs mocking:

  • Database calls
  • External APIs
  • File system operations
  • Time-dependent code

4. Add Assertions

Check:

  • Return values
  • State changes
  • Side effects
  • Error handling

Quick Response Patterns

For Simple Classes

When user shows a class with 2-3 methods:

  1. Identify the test type (unit vs integration)
  2. Generate test class with proper structure
  3. Create tests for each public method:

- Happy path test - Error case test - Edge case test (if applicable)

  1. Include setup/teardown as needed
  2. Add descriptive test names

Example Response:

"I'll generate PHPUnit tests for your UserManager class.

I see 3 public methods:
- getUser() - retrieves user data
- createUser() - creates new user
- deleteUser() - removes user

I'll create:
- Unit tests for getUser() (no database needed)
- Integration tests for createUser() and deleteUser() (require database)

[Generates test file with 6-8 test methods covering happy paths,
error cases, and edge cases]

This gives you ~80% coverage to start."

For WordPress Functions

When user shows WordPress function using WP APIs:

  1. Determine if unit or integration test
  2. Use WP_UnitTestCase for integration
  3. Use factories for test data
  4. Include setup/teardown for cleanup

Example Response:

"For WordPress functions using WP_Query, you'll want an integration test.

I'll generate a WP_UnitTestCase test that:
1. Creates test posts using the factory
2. Calls your function
3. Verifies the query results
4. Cleans up automatically in tearDown()

[Generates test code]

The test uses wp_insert_post() to create test data."

For Drupal Services

When user shows Drupal service with dependencies:

  1. Identify service dependencies
  2. Create mocks for dependencies in setUp()
  3. Generate unit tests with dependency injection
  4. Add @covers annotations

Example Response:

"I'll generate unit tests for your DataProcessor service.

I see it depends on:
- EntityTypeManagerInterface
- LoggerInterface

I'll:
1. Create mocks for these dependencies
2. Test each public method in isolation
3. Verify interactions with dependencies
4. Add @covers annotations for coverage tracking

[Generates test file with mocked dependencies]

This keeps tests fast by avoiding database calls."

For JavaScript/React Components

When user shows JS function or React component:

  1. Identify if pure function or component
  2. Use Jest for unit tests
  3. Use React Testing Library for components
  4. Mock external dependencies

Integration with CMS Cultivator

This skill complements the /test-generate slash command:

  • This Skill: Automatically triggered during conversation

- "I need tests for this class" - "How do I test this function?" - Quick single-class test generation

  • /test-generate Command: Explicit batch generation

- Generate tests for entire module - Comprehensive test suite creation - Project-wide test coverage

Best Practices

DO:

  • ✅ Test behavior, not implementation details
  • ✅ Use descriptive test names (testCreateUserWithValidData() not testCreateUser())
  • ✅ Follow Arrange-Act-Assert pattern for clarity
  • ✅ Keep tests independent (no dependencies between tests)
  • ✅ Mock external dependencies (APIs, databases, filesystem)
  • ✅ Clean up test data in tearDown()
  • ✅ Test error cases and edge cases, not just happy path
  • ✅ Keep tests fast (< 100ms for unit tests)
  • ✅ Use factories or fixtures for test data
  • ✅ Write tests before fixing bugs (TDD for bug fixes)

DON'T:

  • ❌ Test private methods directly (test through public interface)
  • ❌ Have multiple assertions testing different things (split into separate tests)
  • ❌ Share state between tests (causes flaky tests)
  • ❌ Test framework code or third-party libraries
  • ❌ Use production database or live APIs in tests
  • ❌ Leave test data behind (always clean up)
  • ❌ Skip test setup to save time (leads to unclear tests)
  • ❌ Copy-paste test code (extract helper methods)
  • ❌ Use sleep() or arbitrary waits (use proper async patterns)
  • ❌ Write tests that depend on test execution order

Example Interactions

Example 1: Simple class

User: "I wrote this UserManager class, need tests"
[Shows class with 3 methods]

Skill: "I'll generate PHPUnit tests for your UserManager class.
I see 3 public methods: createUser(), getUser(), deleteUser().
I'll create tests for the happy path and error cases for each.

[Generates test file]

This gives you 80% coverage to start. You may want to add edge case
tests for boundary conditions."

Example 2: WordPress function

User: "How do I test this WordPress function?"
[Shows custom function that uses WP_Query]

Skill: "For WordPress functions using WP_Query, you'll want an
integration test. I'll generate a WP_UnitTestCase test that:
1. Creates test posts using the factory
2. Calls your function
3. Verifies the query results

[Generates test code]

The test uses wp_insert_post() to create test data, then cleans up
automatically in tearDown()."

Example 3: React component

User: "Need tests for this React component"
[Shows UserProfile component]

Skill: "I'll create React Testing Library tests for your UserProfile component.

I see it:
- Displays user data from props
- Has edit button that calls onEdit callback
- Shows loading state

I'll generate tests for:
1. Rendering with user data
2. Clicking edit button
3. Loading state display

[Generates test file using React Testing Library]

These tests verify the component behavior from a user perspective."

Common Patterns

Testing Private Methods

Don't. Test public interface instead. If private method needs testing, consider extracting to separate class.

Testing Static Methods

// Avoid static methods when possible
// If you must, test directly
$result = MyClass::staticMethod($input);
$this->assertEquals($expected, $result);

Testing Database Operations

// Use transactions for rollback
protected function setUp(): void {
  parent::setUp();
  $this->database->beginTransaction();
}

protected function tearDown(): void {
  $this->database->rollbackTransaction();
  parent::tearDown();
}

Testing Async JavaScript

it('fetches user data', async () => {
  const user = await fetchUser(123);
  expect(user.name).toBe('John Doe');
});

// Or with promises
it('fetches user data', () => {
  return fetchUser(123).then(user => {
    expect(user.name).toBe('John Doe');
  });
});

Platform-Specific Guidelines

Drupal Testing

  • Use proper namespace: Drupal\Tests\mymodule\Unit
  • Add @group annotation
  • Add @covers annotation for coverage
  • Use UnitTestCase for unit tests
  • Use KernelTestBase for database tests
  • Use BrowserTestBase for functional tests

WordPress Testing

  • Extend WP_UnitTestCase
  • Use factories for test data
  • Follow WordPress naming: test_method_name()
  • Use assertions: $this->assertIsArray()
  • Clean up in tearDown()

JavaScript Testing

  • Use describe() for grouping
  • Use test() or it() for individual tests
  • Use beforeEach() for setup
  • Mock external dependencies
  • Test user interactions, not implementation

Resources

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Cursor

39.02%
按下载量换算43

Codex

31.97%
按下载量换算35

Claude Code

17.77%
按下载量换算19

Antigravity

7.1%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills