Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发只读clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

test-design测试设计

Agent Skill

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范、排版、配色、布局和交互体验优化。它适合让 Agent 根据产品场景整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案、检查视觉一致性或改进组件层级。使用时需要结合现有品牌、设计系统和用户任务,不应只堆装饰元素;涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现。

总安装

4,176

周安装

174

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

1,392
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:test-design(测试设计)
来源仓库:https://github.com/sydpz/test-design
安装命令:
openclaw skills install test-design
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install test-design

简介

test-design 用于综合测试策略设计与用例编写,覆盖单元、集成与 e2e 测试。

  • 适合复杂系统测试规划,提升缺陷发现效率。
  • 可生成测试框架模板,适配主流开发语言与环境。
  • 安装命令为 openclaw skills install test-design,需确认项目技术栈匹配度。
  • 建议结合失败日志分析,持续优化测试覆盖范围。

SKILL.md

name
test-design
description
>
Triggers
test design, test strategy, unit test, integration test, e2e test, TDD,
Provides
testing pyramid guidance, test case templates, test categorization,

Test Design Skill

A structured approach to designing tests that give confidence without excessive maintenance burden.

Core Philosophy

Test behavior, not implementation. Tests that couple to internal implementation details become fragile and refactor-resistant. Aim to test what the code does, not how it does it.

The best test is the one that fails when something breaks, and passes when everything works. Perfect coverage means nothing if tests don't catch real bugs.

Testing Pyramid

        ┌─────────┐
        │   E2E   │  ← Few, slow, high confidence
       ┌┴─────────┴┐
       │ Integration│ ← Some, medium speed
      ┌┴───────────┴┐
      │    Unit     │ ← Many, fast, granular
      └─────────────┘

Unit tests form the base — fast, isolated, cover individual functions. Integration tests verify components work together. E2E tests validate complete user journeys.

Test Case Design

Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA) Pattern

def test_withdraw_amount_exceeds_balance():
    # Arrange
    account = Account(balance=Decimal("100.00"))
    
    # Act
    result = account.withdraw(Decimal("150.00"))
    
    # Assert
    assert result.is_failed()
    assert account.balance == Decimal("100.00")  # unchanged

Given-When-Then (GWT) Pattern

Feature: Account Withdrawal

  Scenario: Withdrawal amount exceeds balance
    Given an account with balance $100
    When I withdraw $150
    Then the withdrawal is rejected
    And the balance remains $100

Test Categories

🔴 Happy Path Tests

  • Verify the main success scenario works
  • At least one per feature/function

🟡 Edge Case Tests

  • Boundary values (0, -1, max integer)
  • Empty/null inputs
  • Rare but possible conditions

🟡 Error Case Tests

  • Invalid inputs
  • Missing dependencies
  • Permission denied scenarios

🟢 Edge/Extreme Cases

  • Very large inputs
  • Very small inputs
  • Unicode/special characters
  • Concurrent access

Test Doubles (Mocks/Stubs/Fakes)

TypePurposeUse When
DummyFill parameter listsNever actually used
StubProvide predetermined responsesTest requires specific data
SpyRecord how something was calledVerify interactions
MockPre-programmed expectationsVerify behavior + interactions
FakeWorking implementation (simplified)Real impl too slow/complex

Rule: Prefer real objects over mocks when practical. Mocks hide integration problems.

Test Naming Convention

test_<unit>_<scenario>_<expected_result>

Examples:

  • test_user_create_with_valid_input_succeeds
  • test_user_create_with_duplicate_email_fails
  • test_order_cancel_after_shipment_refunds_full_amount

Coverage Targets

LayerTargetPurpose
Unit70-80%Core business logic
Integration40-60%Key flows work together
E2ECritical paths onlyUser journeys

Note: Coverage is a guide, not a goal. 100% coverage with shallow tests is worse than 70% with meaningful assertions.

Test Execution

Unit Tests

Run frequently during development (every save).

# Go
go test ./...

# Python
pytest tests/unit/ -v

# TypeScript
npm test -- --coverage

Integration Tests

Run before PR, after unit tests pass.

# Start dependencies
docker-compose up -d

# Run integration suite
pytest tests/integration/ -v

E2E Tests

Run on CI against deployed environment.

# CI/CD pipeline
npm run test:e2e -- --specs=critical-paths

Test Data Management

Strategies

  1. Factories/Fixtures — Create test data on demand
  2. Seeded Data — Deterministic test datasets
  3. Randomized Data — Fuzz testing with random inputs
  4. Snapshot Testing — Verify serializable outputs

Best Practices

  • Tests should be independent (no shared state)
  • Each test should clean up after itself
  • Use meaningful data, not magic values
  • Avoid test interdependencies

File Structure

test-design/
├── SKILL.md
└── references/
    ├── test-case-templates.md
    ├── testing-pyramid.md
    ├── mocking-strategies.md
    ├── test-naming-conventions.md
    └── per-type/
        ├── unit-test-guide.md
        ├── integration-test-guide.md
        └── e2e-test-guide.md

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

70.28%
按下载量换算978

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills