Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

telegram-colored-choices-buttonsTelegram colored choices buttons 搜索

Agent Skill

telegram-colored-choices-buttons 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

18,825

周安装

769

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

6,029
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:telegram-colored-choices-buttons(Telegram colored choices buttons 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/dandysuper/telegram-colored-choices-buttons
安装命令:
openclaw skills install telegram-colored-choices-buttons
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install telegram-colored-choices-buttons

简介

根据操作的关键性和可逆性,自动将 Telegram 机器人选择按钮着色为默认、破坏性(红色)或次要(灰色)。

SKILL.md

Openclaw AI Bot — Colored Choice Buttons Skill

Purpose

Every time the bot presents choices to the user, it MUST automatically color each button based on how critical, irreversible, or different the choices are. The bot never sends plain/unstyled choice buttons — color is always applied.

Core Rule

Whenever the bot sends 2+ choices to a user, classify each choice and assign a style automatically. This is not optional.


Telegram Bot API — Button Styles

Two fields on InlineKeyboardButton and KeyboardButton:

  • style (String, Optional) — Button color:

- *(omit)* — Default accent/blue. The recommended / safe / primary action. - "destructive" — Red. Irreversible, dangerous, or high-stakes actions. - "secondary" — Gray/muted. Low-priority, dismiss, skip, or neutral actions.

  • icon_custom_emoji_id (String, Optional) — Custom emoji icon on the button.

Automatic Classification Rules

When the bot builds a set of choice buttons, it MUST classify every choice into one of three tiers before sending:

Tier 1 — Default (accent/blue): The recommended path

Apply when the choice is:

  • The safest or most common action
  • A positive confirmation ("Yes", "Continue", "Accept", "Start")
  • The action the bot would recommend
  • Moving forward in a flow

Do: omit the style field (or set to null).

Tier 2 — Destructive (red): High-stakes or irreversible

Apply when the choice:

  • Deletes, removes, or permanently changes something
  • Cancels an in-progress operation that loses work
  • Blocks, bans, or restricts a user
  • Rejects, declines, or refuses something important
  • Spends money, tokens, or credits
  • Cannot be undone easily

Do: set "style": "destructive".

Tier 3 — Secondary (gray): Low-priority or escape hatch

Apply when the choice:

  • Skips, dismisses, or postpones ("Maybe later", "Not now")
  • Is a neutral fallback ("Back", "Cancel" when nothing is lost)
  • Shows more info without committing ("Details", "Help")
  • Is the least important option in the set

Do: set "style": "secondary".


How to Decide — Contrast Matters

When choices differ in criticality, the colors MUST reflect that contrast:

High contrast — choices have very different consequences:

 "Delete my account" → destructive (red)
 "Keep my account"   → default (blue)

Medium contrast — one main action, one escape:

 "Subscribe"   → default (blue)
 "Not now"     → secondary (gray)

Low contrast — choices are roughly equal:

 "Option A" → default (blue)
 "Option B" → default (blue)
 "Skip"     → secondary (gray)

Multiple tiers in one set:

 "Confirm purchase"  → default (blue)     — recommended
 "Change amount"     → secondary (gray)   — neutral/back
 "Cancel order"      → destructive (red)  — loses progress

Classification Examples

Bot asks: "Approve this document?"

[
  [{"text": "✅ Approve", "callback_data": "approve"},
   {"text": "❌ Reject", "callback_data": "reject", "style": "destructive"}],
  [{"text": "⏭ Review later", "callback_data": "skip", "style": "secondary"}]
]

Bot asks: "Pick a plan:"

[
  [{"text": "Free Plan", "callback_data": "free"},
   {"text": "Pro Plan", "callback_data": "pro"}],
  [{"text": "Compare plans", "callback_data": "compare", "style": "secondary"}]
]

(Equal choices = both default; info link = secondary)

Bot asks: "Delete all messages in this chat?"

[
  [{"text": "🗑 Delete all", "callback_data": "delete_all", "style": "destructive"}],
  [{"text": "Keep messages", "callback_data": "keep"}]
]

(Destructive action is red; safe action is the default blue)

Bot asks: "Transfer 500 tokens to @user?"

[
  [{"text": "Send 500 tokens", "callback_data": "send", "style": "destructive"},
   {"text": "Cancel", "callback_data": "cancel", "style": "secondary"}]
]

(Spending = destructive since it costs something; cancel = secondary)


Implementation — Python Auto-Classifier

The bot MUST use a classifier function to determine style. Here is the reference implementation:

import re

# Keywords that signal each tier (case-insensitive, matched against button text + callback_data)
DESTRUCTIVE_SIGNALS = [
    r"\bdelete\b", r"\bremove\b", r"\bban\b", r"\bblock\b",
    r"\breject\b", r"\bdecline\b", r"\brevoke\b", r"\bterminate\b",
    r"\bcancel order\b", r"\bcancel subscription\b",
    r"\bunsubscribe\b", r"\bdestroy\b", r"\bpurge\b",
    r"\bspend\b", r"\btransfer\b", r"\bpay\b", r"\bsend.*tokens?\b",
    r"\breset\b", r"\bclear all\b", r"\bwipe\b",
    r"\bleave\b", r"\bquit\b", r"\bdisconnect\b",
]

SECONDARY_SIGNALS = [
    r"\bskip\b", r"\bnot now\b", r"\bmaybe later\b", r"\blater\b",
    r"\bback\b", r"\bdismiss\b", r"\bclose\b",
    r"\bdetails\b", r"\bmore info\b", r"\bhelp\b", r"\babout\b",
    r"\bno thanks\b", r"\bnevermind\b",
    r"\bcancel$",  # plain "cancel" (no lost work) = secondary, not destructive
]


def classify_button_style(text: str, callback_data: str = "", context_hint: str = "") -> str | None:
    """
    Automatically determine the button style based on its text and context.

    Returns:
        "destructive" — red button (irreversible / high-stakes)
        "secondary"   — gray button (low-priority / dismiss)
        None          — default blue button (primary / recommended)

    context_hint: optional extra context like "this action costs money"
    """
    combined = f"{text} {callback_data} {context_hint}".lower()

    # Check destructive first (higher priority)
    for pattern in DESTRUCTIVE_SIGNALS:
        if re.search(pattern, combined):
            return "destructive"

    # Then secondary
    for pattern in SECONDARY_SIGNALS:
        if re.search(pattern, combined):
            return "secondary"

    # Default = primary (blue)
    return None


def build_choice_buttons(choices: list[dict]) -> list[list[dict]]:
    """
    Takes a list of raw choices and returns Bot API inline_keyboard rows
    with styles automatically assigned.

    Each choice dict:
        text (str):          Button label (required)
        data (str):          callback_data (required unless url is set)
        url (str):           URL button (optional, mutually exclusive with data)
        style (str|None):    Override style — if set, skip auto-classification
        context (str):       Extra hint for classifier (e.g. "costs money")
        emoji_id (str):      Custom emoji ID (optional)
        row (int):           Force button into a specific row (optional)

    Returns list of rows suitable for inline_keyboard.
    """
    # Group by row
    row_map: dict[int, list[dict]] = {}
    auto_row = 0
    for i, choice in enumerate(choices):
        btn: dict = {"text": choice["text"]}

        # Action
        if "url" in choice:
            btn["url"] = choice["url"]
        else:
            btn["callback_data"] = choice.get("data", choice["text"].lower().replace(" ", "_"))

        # Style — use override if provided, else auto-classify
        if "style" in choice and choice["style"] is not None:
            btn["style"] = choice["style"]
        else:
            auto_style = classify_button_style(
                choice["text"],
                choice.get("data", ""),
                choice.get("context", ""),
            )
            if auto_style:
                btn["style"] = auto_style

        # Custom emoji
        if "emoji_id" in choice:
            btn["icon_custom_emoji_id"] = choice["emoji_id"]

        # Row assignment
        target_row = choice.get("row", auto_row)
        row_map.setdefault(target_row, []).append(btn)

        # Auto-advance row every 2 buttons
        if len(row_map.get(auto_row, [])) >= 2:
            auto_row += 1

    return [row_map[k] for k in sorted(row_map.keys())]

Using the classifier in the bot:

import requests

def send_choices(bot_token, chat_id, text, choices, parse_mode="HTML"):
    """Send a message with auto-colored choice buttons."""
    keyboard = build_choice_buttons(choices)
    payload = {
        "chat_id": chat_id,
        "text": text,
        "parse_mode": parse_mode,
        "reply_markup": {"inline_keyboard": keyboard},
    }
    url = f"https://api.telegram.org/bot{bot_token}/sendMessage"
    resp = requests.post(url, json=payload)
    resp.raise_for_status()
    return resp.json()

# The bot just passes raw choices — colors are assigned automatically:
send_choices(TOKEN, chat_id, "Approve this document?", [
    {"text": "✅ Approve", "data": "approve"},
    {"text": "❌ Reject", "data": "reject"},          # auto → destructive (red)
    {"text": "⏭ Review later", "data": "later"},       # auto → secondary (gray)
])

Usage with python-telegram-bot library

If the library version does not yet expose style, pass it via api_kwargs.
from telegram import InlineKeyboardButton, InlineKeyboardMarkup

def auto_button(text, callback_data, context=""):
    style = classify_button_style(text, callback_data, context)
    kwargs = {"style": style} if style else {}
    return InlineKeyboardButton(text, callback_data=callback_data, api_kwargs=kwargs)

keyboard = InlineKeyboardMarkup([
    [auto_button("Approve", "approve"),
     auto_button("Reject", "reject")],
    [auto_button("Skip", "skip")],
])
await update.message.reply_text("Pick an option:", reply_markup=keyboard)

Reply Keyboard — Same Rules Apply

{
  "chat_id": "<CHAT_ID>",
  "text": "Delete your data?",
  "reply_markup": {
    "keyboard": [
      [
        {"text": "Keep my data"},
        {"text": "Delete everything", "style": "destructive"}
      ]
    ],
    "resize_keyboard": true,
    "one_time_keyboard": true
  }
}

Custom Emoji on Buttons

Can be combined with style on the same button:

{"text": "Boost", "callback_data": "boost", "style": "destructive", "icon_custom_emoji_id": "5368324170671202286"}

Shell Helper

Quick test with colored buttons:

./SKILL.sh <BOT_TOKEN> <CHAT_ID>

References

  • Telegram Bot API: https://core.telegram.org/bots/api
  • Bot API Changelog: https://core.telegram.org/bots/api-changelog
  • Telegram Blog Announcement: https://telegram.org/blog/crafting-android-design-and-more

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

78.32%
按下载量换算4,722

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills