Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
效率需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

techwritetechwrite 文档

Agent Skill

techwrite 用于整理文档、README、Markdown 和说明材料,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要把零散信息整理成结构清晰的文档时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

3,960

周安装

165

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

1,320
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:techwrite(techwrite 文档)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mike47512/techwrite
安装命令:
openclaw skills install techwrite
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install techwrite

简介

techwrite 用于整理文档、README 和 Markdown 材料,适合在 OpenClaw 中把零散信息结构化。

  • 适用于开发人员文档、设计说明等内容起草与优化场景。
  • 通过分析受众、目的、结构和示例等要素提升内容质量。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否涉及文件读写或联网操作。
  • 建议结合原始 README 和项目仓库进一步验证具体用法。

SKILL.md

name
techwrite
description
Deep workflow for technical prose—audience, purpose, structure, precision, examples, diagrams, review, and iteration. Use when drafting developer docs, design notes, internal guides, RFCs, or public technical articles.

Technical Writing (Deep Workflow)

Technical writing succeeds when readers can act or decide with less confusion. Optimize for clarity, correctness, and appropriate depth—not word count.

When to Offer This Workflow

Trigger conditions:

  • New feature docs, migration guides, API references
  • RFCs, ADRs, architecture summaries
  • Runbooks, onboarding docs, postmortems (writing-heavy)
  • “Make this clearer” edits on existing pages

Initial offer:

Use six stages: (1) define audience & goal, (2) outline & scope, (3) draft core content, (4) examples & edge cases, (5) review for clarity, (6) ship & maintain. Ask for template or style guide if org has one.


Stage 1: Audience & Goal

Goal: One primary reader persona; one outcome.

Questions

  1. Who reads (new hire, partner engineer, SRE, end user of API)?
  2. Job-to-be-done: debug issue? integrate API? approve design?
  3. Constraints: word limit, legal review, localization later?

Anti-goals

  • “Everyone” audience → usually nobody satisfied—prefer layered docs (overview + deep dive links)

Exit condition: Success sentence: “After reading, the reader can ___.”


Stage 2: Outline & Scope

Goal: BLUF + sections that match mental model.

Practices

  • Top: context + outcome + prerequisites
  • Middle: procedural steps OR conceptual model—pick one primary mode per doc
  • Bottom: troubleshooting, FAQ, links, changelog

Scope control

  • In scope / out of scope box for ambiguous topics
  • Version and last reviewed metadata for fast-moving products

Exit condition: Outline reviewed; order matches reader journey (often happy path first).


Stage 3: Draft Core Content

Goal: Precise, scannable, honest.

Style

  • Short sentences; active voice for procedures (“Click…”, “Run…”)
  • Define terms on first use; glossary for large docs
  • Avoid vague adjectives (“robust”, “seamless”) without criteria

Structure signals

  • Headings that describe content; lists for sequences and parallel items
  • Numbered steps for order-sensitive actions

Exit condition: First full pass complete—ugly OK, precision matters more than polish.


Stage 4: Examples & Edge Cases

Goal: Examples reduce tickets; edge cases build trust.

Examples

  • Minimal complete snippet; realistic names; expected output
  • Show failure example when errors are common—include how to fix

Edge cases

  • Permissions, rate limits, idempotency, backward compatibility
  • “If you see X, do Y” troubleshooting table when helpful

Exit condition: At least one end-to-end path works on fresh machine (when procedural).


Stage 5: Review for Clarity

Goal: Remove ambiguity and hidden assumptions.

Checklist

  • Ambiguous pronouns (“it”, “this”)—replace with nouns
  • Implied steps—make explicit
  • Diagrams: labeled arrows; alt text for accessibility
  • Links: avoid broken anchors; prefer stable URLs

Reviews

  • Peer review for technical accuracy; non-expert read for onboarding docs

Exit condition: Another reader can follow without asking clarifying questions—or questions are FAQ’d.


Stage 6: Ship & Maintain

Goal: Docs decay—plan updates.

Practices

  • Owner field; review cadence for critical paths
  • Changelog or page history when platform changes often
  • Deprecate old pages with redirects

Final Review Checklist

  • [ ] Audience and success outcome explicit
  • [ ] Outline matches reader journey
  • [ ] Procedures numbered; concepts separated from steps
  • [ ] Examples + failures where needed
  • [ ] Reviewed for ambiguity; diagrams accessible

Tips for Effective Guidance

  • Prefer concrete nouns over abstractions (“the database primary” vs “the system”).
  • When user pastes draft, do surgical edits—preserve voice unless clarity suffers.
  • For non-native readers, avoid idioms and culture-specific jokes.

Handling Deviations

  • Marketing-heavy request: separate facts from positioning; flag risky claims.
  • Legal-sensitive: suggest expert review; avoid drafting binding language unless qualified.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

93.75%
按下载量换算1,238

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills