Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

tech-debt-scanner科技债务扫描仪

Agent Skill

tech-debt-scanner 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,670

周安装

71

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

585
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:tech-debt-scanner(科技债务扫描仪)
来源仓库:https://github.com/charlie-morrison/tech-debt-scanner
安装命令:
openclaw skills install tech-debt-scanner
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install tech-debt-scanner

简介

扫描代码库中的 TODO/FIXME 注释与弃用 API,识别复杂度热点与测试缺失。

  • 适用于技术债务发现与重构优先级排序场景。
  • 输出包含问题类型、位置与修复建议的清单。
  • 安装命令:openclaw skills install tech-debt-scanner;需指定扫描目录与语言类型。
  • 注意:涉及私有仓库时应确认 token 权限与访问范围。

SKILL.md

name
tech-debt-scanner
description
Scan codebases for technical debt — TODO/FIXME comments, deprecated APIs, complexity hotspots, outdated patterns, missing tests, large files — then prioritize with AI reasoning and generate remediation plans.

Tech Debt Scanner

Find, categorize, and prioritize technical debt in any codebase. Produces an actionable report with effort estimates, risk scores, and remediation suggestions — not just a list of problems.

Use when: "scan for tech debt", "find code smells", "audit code quality", "what should we refactor first", "technical debt report", or before sprint planning to identify cleanup candidates.

Commands

1. scan — Full Tech Debt Audit

Run all detectors and produce a prioritized report.

Step 1: Detect TODO/FIXME/HACK Comments

# Find all debt markers with context
rg -n "TODO|FIXME|HACK|XXX|TEMP|WORKAROUND|DEPRECATED|NOCOMMIT" \
  --type-not binary \
  -g '!node_modules' -g '!vendor' -g '!dist' -g '!build' -g '!.git' \
  --stats 2>&1

Categorize each hit:

  • TODO: Feature incomplete — low risk, track in backlog
  • FIXME: Known bug — medium risk, prioritize
  • HACK/WORKAROUND: Fragile code — high risk, refactor soon
  • DEPRECATED: API sunset — high risk if external dependency
  • NOCOMMIT: Should never have been merged — critical

Count totals per category. Flag any older than 6 months (check git blame):

# Age of oldest TODO/FIXME (sample first 10)
rg -l "TODO|FIXME|HACK" -g '!node_modules' -g '!vendor' | head -10 | while read f; do
  echo "=== $f ==="
  git log -1 --format="%ai %an" -- "$f" 2>/dev/null
done

Step 2: Detect Complexity Hotspots

# Largest source files (often the most complex)
find . -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.py" -o -name "*.go" -o -name "*.rs" -o -name "*.java" \) \
  -not -path '*/node_modules/*' -not -path '*/vendor/*' -not -path '*/dist/*' -not -path '*/.git/*' \
  -exec wc -l {} + 2>/dev/null | sort -rn | head -20

# Functions with high nesting (proxy for cyclomatic complexity)
rg -n "^\s{12,}(if|for|while|switch|case|catch)" \
  --type-not binary \
  -g '!node_modules' -g '!vendor' -g '!dist' \
  --stats 2>&1 | tail -5

Flag files >500 lines as candidates for splitting. Flag functions with >4 levels of nesting as complexity hotspots.

Step 3: Detect Outdated Patterns

# JavaScript/TypeScript: var usage (should be let/const)
rg -c "^\s*var\s+" -g '*.{js,ts,jsx,tsx}' -g '!node_modules' 2>/dev/null | sort -t: -k2 -rn | head -10

# JavaScript: callback hell (nested callbacks)
rg -c "function\s*\(" -g '*.{js,ts}' -g '!node_modules' 2>/dev/null | sort -t: -k2 -rn | head -10

# Python: old-style string formatting
rg -c '% ["\'(]' -g '*.py' -g '!vendor' 2>/dev/null | sort -t: -k2 -rn | head -10

# Python: bare except
rg -n "except:" -g '*.py' -g '!vendor' 2>/dev/null

# Deprecated React patterns
rg -n "componentWillMount|componentWillReceiveProps|componentWillUpdate|React\.createClass|mixins\s*:" \
  -g '*.{jsx,tsx,js,ts}' -g '!node_modules' 2>/dev/null

Step 4: Detect Missing or Weak Tests

# Test file ratio
SRC_COUNT=$(find . -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.py" -o -name "*.go" \) \
  -not -path '*/node_modules/*' -not -path '*/vendor/*' -not -path '*/test*' -not -path '*/__test*' \
  -not -path '*/*.test.*' -not -path '*/*.spec.*' -not -path '*/dist/*' | wc -l)
TEST_COUNT=$(find . -type f \( -name "*.test.*" -o -name "*.spec.*" -o -name "test_*" -o -name "*_test.*" \) \
  -not -path '*/node_modules/*' | wc -l)
echo "Source files: $SRC_COUNT, Test files: $TEST_COUNT, Ratio: $(echo "scale=1; $TEST_COUNT * 100 / ($SRC_COUNT + 1)" | bc)%"

# Source files with no corresponding test
find . -type f -name "*.ts" -not -name "*.test.*" -not -name "*.spec.*" \
  -not -path '*/node_modules/*' -not -path '*/dist/*' | while read f; do
  BASE=$(basename "$f" .ts)
  if ! find . -type f \( -name "${BASE}.test.ts" -o -name "${BASE}.spec.ts" -o -name "test_${BASE}*" \) \
    -not -path '*/node_modules/*' 2>/dev/null | grep -q .; then
    echo "NO TEST: $f"
  fi
done | head -20

Step 5: Detect Dependency Issues

# Node.js: outdated dependencies
npm outdated 2>/dev/null || true
# Check for deprecated packages in package.json
cat package.json 2>/dev/null | python3 -c "
import json, sys
try:
    d = json.load(sys.stdin)
    deps = {**d.get('dependencies',{}), **d.get('devDependencies',{})}
    deprecated = ['request', 'node-uuid', 'nomnom', 'optimist', 'jade', 'istanbul', 'coffee-script', 'bower', 'grunt']
    for pkg in deprecated:
        if pkg in deps:
            print(f'DEPRECATED: {pkg}@{deps[pkg]}')
except: pass
"

# Python: check requirements age
cat requirements.txt 2>/dev/null | head -30
pip list --outdated 2>/dev/null | head -20

# Go: check go.sum for old versions
cat go.sum 2>/dev/null | wc -l

Step 6: Detect Code Duplication Indicators

# Find suspiciously similar file names (copy-paste indicators)
find . -type f -name "*.ts" -not -path '*/node_modules/*' -not -path '*/dist/*' | \
  xargs -I{} basename {} | sort | uniq -d

# Find repeated import patterns (same large import block = shared code candidate)
rg -c "^import" -g '*.{ts,js,tsx,jsx}' -g '!node_modules' 2>/dev/null | \
  sort -t: -k2 -rn | head -10

# Find files with very similar line counts (heuristic for copies)
find . -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" \) \
  -not -path '*/node_modules/*' -not -path '*/dist/*' \
  -exec wc -l {} + 2>/dev/null | sort -n | awk '{print $1}' | uniq -d | head -5

Step 7: Generate Report

Analyze all findings with AI reasoning. For each debt item, assess:

  • Risk: How likely is this to cause bugs, outages, or slow development?
  • Effort: T-shirt size (XS/S/M/L/XL) to fix
  • Impact: What improves when fixed? (velocity, reliability, onboarding, security)

Produce a prioritized report:

# Tech Debt Report — [project name]
Generated: [date]

## Summary
- Total debt items: N
- Critical (fix now): N
- High (next sprint): N
- Medium (backlog): N
- Low (opportunistic): N

## Critical Items
1. [item] — Risk: critical | Effort: S | Impact: ...
   **Why:** [AI reasoning about the risk]
   **Fix:** [specific remediation steps]

## High Priority Items
...

## Metrics
- TODO/FIXME count: N (N are >6 months old)
- Test coverage ratio: N%
- Files >500 lines: N
- Deprecated dependencies: N
- Code duplication indicators: N hotspots

2. hotspots — Complexity Hotspot Map

Run Steps 2 and 6 only. Output the top 10 files that are:

  • Largest by line count
  • Most frequently changed (git churn)
  • Most complex (deep nesting)
# Git churn — most frequently modified files in last 90 days
git log --since="90 days ago" --name-only --pretty=format: 2>/dev/null | \
  grep -v '^$' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -20

Cross-reference size × churn × nesting to find the "burning" hotspots — large, complex files that change often are the highest-ROI refactoring targets.

3. todos — TODO/FIXME Audit

Run Step 1 only. Group by file, show git blame age for each, flag ancient ones.

Output format:

[CRITICAL] path/to/file.ts:42 — HACK: workaround for API bug (author, 2024-03-15)
[MEDIUM]   path/to/file.ts:87 — TODO: add validation (author, 2025-11-02)
[LOW]      path/to/other.py:12 — TODO: optimize later (author, 2026-04-01)

4. deps — Dependency Health

Run Step 5 only. Show:

  • Outdated packages with how far behind they are (major/minor/patch)
  • Known deprecated packages
  • Packages with known vulnerabilities (npm audit / pip-audit if available)

5. tests — Test Coverage Gaps

Run Step 4 only. List source files without corresponding tests, sorted by:

  1. Size (larger untested files = higher risk)
  2. Git churn (frequently changed untested files = highest risk)

Output Formats

  • text (default): Human-readable report with sections and bullet points
  • json: Machine-readable for CI/CD integration, structured as {summary, items: [{category, severity, file, line, message, effort, fix}]}
  • markdown: Formatted report suitable for PR comments or wiki pages

CI Integration

Exit codes:

  • 0: No critical or high debt items
  • 1: Critical items found (fail the build)
  • 2: High items exceed threshold

Use with --max-critical 0 --max-high 10 to set thresholds.

Notes

  • Adapts detectors to the project's language (auto-detected from file extensions and config files)
  • Git history required for churn and age analysis — works without git but reports are less useful
  • Does not execute code or install dependencies — static analysis only
  • Large monorepos: pass a subdirectory to scope the scan

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

87.49%
按下载量换算512

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills