Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索执行命令clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

team-code团队代码

Agent Skill

team-code 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

2,940

周安装

125

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

1,030
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:team-code(团队代码)
来源仓库:https://github.com/simoncatbot/team-code
安装命令:
openclaw skills install team-code
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install team-code

简介

协调多个 AI 工程师协同完成编码项目的开发框架。

  • 模拟真实团队协作流程,提升复杂系统开发效率。
  • 适用于多人协作的中大型软件项目与代码审查辅助。
  • 需设定清晰的任务拆分与合并策略以避免冲突。适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。
  • team-code 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

name
team-code
description
Coordinate multiple AI agents as a development team to tackle complex coding projects faster and more accurately. Like having a team of engineers working in parallel on different parts of your codebase—each in their own isolated branch, with automatic integration and verification. Use for multi-file features, complex refactors, or any project where parallel development beats solo coding. Works like pair programming, but with as many agents as your task needs (2-4 recommended, max 8).

Team Code - Multi-Agent Development

Team Code implements the CAID (Centralized Asynchronous Isolated Delegation) research paradigm for coordinating multiple AI agents as a development team.

Think of it like this: instead of one developer working alone on a complex feature, you have a team of specialists working in parallel—each in their own isolated workspace, with a tech lead (manager) coordinating who works on what and when.

⚠️ CRITICAL WARNINGS: - Use Team Code from the start — Don't try solo first. Sequential attempts cost nearly 2x with minimal gain. - Physical branch isolation is mandatory — Shared workspaces cause silent conflicts that break everything. - Team size matters — 2 agents for research tasks, 4 for clear codebases, never exceed 8. - Higher cost, better results — Team Code improves accuracy (+26%), not speed. Worth it for important code.

The Analogy: Human Dev Team

Human TeamTeam Code
Tech lead assigns tasksManager builds dependency graph
Developers work in branchesAgents work in git worktrees
Pull requests for reviewSelf-verification before commit
Merge conflicts resolved by authorAgent resolves their own conflicts
Code review before shippingManager final review

When to Use Team Code

Perfect for:

  • 🏗️ Building features that touch multiple files (auth, API, database)
  • 🔄 Complex refactors with clear dependency chains
  • 📚 Implementing libraries from scratch with test suites
  • 🔬 Research reproductions (paper implementations)

Skip for:

  • 🔧 One-line fixes or single-file changes
  • 🧪 Pure exploration without clear structure
  • ⏱️ Quick prototypes where "good enough" is fine

The Workflow

Phase 0: Setup (Manager = You)

Before the team starts, prepare the environment:

cd your-project

# Ensure dependencies work
pip install -r requirements.txt  # or npm install, etc.

# Create minimal stubs so imports don't fail
mkdir -p src/feature
touch src/feature/__init__.py src/feature/module_a.py src/feature/module_b.py

# Commit so team starts from known state
git add .
git commit -m "setup: initial feature structure"

Phase 1: Plan (Dependency Graph)

Analyze what needs to be built and in what order:

Your Task: "Add user authentication"

Dependencies:
  database.py ─→ models.py ─→ auth.py ─→ api.py
     (none)      (needs db)   (needs    (needs
                               models)   auth)

Round 1: database.py (foundation)
Round 2: models.py (depends on db)
Round 3: auth.py (depends on models)
Round 4: api.py (depends on auth)

Phase 2: Delegate to Agents

// Agent 1: Database (no dependencies)
await sessions_spawn({
  runtime: "subagent",
  task: `
    Implement database connection in src/feature/database.py
    - connect() function
    - Connection pooling
    - Error handling
    
    VERIFY: pytest tests/test_database.py -v
    RESTRICTED: src/feature/__init__.py
  `,
  agentId: "coding-agent",
  mode: "run",
  runTimeoutSeconds: 400
});
// Agent 2: Models (after database completes)
await sessions_spawn({
  runtime: "subagent",
  task: `
    Implement User model in src/feature/models.py
    - User class with SQLAlchemy
    - Fields: id, username, email, password_hash
    - Methods: set_password(), check_password()
    
    DEPENDS ON: database module (completed)
    VERIFY: pytest tests/test_models.py -v
    RESTRICTED: src/feature/__init__.py, src/feature/database.py
  `,
  agentId: "coding-agent",
  mode: "run",
  runTimeoutSeconds: 400
});

Phase 3: Integrate

# When agent signals completion
git checkout main
git merge feature/database

# If conflict - agent who created it resolves:
cd ../workspace-database
git pull origin main
# fix conflicts
pytest tests/test_database.py -v
git commit --amend

Phase 4: Final Review

# After all rounds complete
git checkout main
pytest tests/ -v                    # Full test suite
python -c "from src.feature import auth; print('OK')"  # Smoke test

Team Size Guide

Task TypeTeam SizeWhy
Research/paper reproduction2Complex dependencies, manager heavy
Library implementation4Clear file structure, parallelizable
API + frontend feature2-3Frontend/backend parallel
Simple multi-file refactor2Limited parallelism
Never exceed8Coordination tax exceeds gains

Key Principles

1. Branch Isolation is Mandatory

# CORRECT: Physical isolation
git worktree add ../workspace-agent-1 feature/task-1
git worktree add ../workspace-agent-2 feature/task-2

# WRONG: Soft isolation (leads to conflicts)
# All agents in same directory with "don't touch each other's files"

2. Self-Verification Before Commit

Agent must run tests and fix failures BEFORE submitting:

pytest tests/test_my_module.py -v  # Must pass
git commit -m "implement: feature X"  # Only then

3. Structured Communication Only

Use JSON task specs, not conversation:

{
  "task_id": "implement-auth",
  "description": "JWT authentication",
  "files": ["src/auth/jwt.py"],
  "verify": "pytest tests/test_jwt.py -v",
  "restricted": ["src/auth/__init__.py"]
}

4. Agent Resolves Their Own Conflicts

If merge fails, the agent who wrote the code fixes it—not the manager.

Common Patterns

Pattern: Sequential Dependencies

A ─→ B ─→ C ─→ D

Start 1 agent, when done start next. Not parallel but structured.

Pattern: Parallel Foundation

  ┌──→ A ──→ C ─┐
  │              ├──→ E
  └──→ B ──→ D ─┘

A and B parallel, then C and D parallel, then E.

Pattern: Star (Common API Structure)

    ┌──→ Endpoint A
    │
DB ─┼──→ Endpoint B
    │
    └──→ Endpoint C

Database first, then all endpoints in parallel.

Trade-offs

AspectSolo AgentTeam Code
SpeedFaster wall-clockSimilar/slower
Accuracy42-57%59-68% (+14-26%)
CostLowerHigher
Best forQuick fixesImportant code

Rule of thumb: If you'd assign this to a human team, use Team Code.

Quick Start Template

// 1. Setup your project
cd my-project
git checkout -b feature/xyz

// 2. Create stubs
touch src/module.py
git add . && git commit -m "setup: stubs"

// 3. Plan dependencies
// Draw: what depends on what?

// 4. Spawn first agent (foundation)
const agent1 = await sessions_spawn({
  runtime: "subagent",
  task: "Implement foundation: src/core.py with...",
  mode: "run",
  timeoutSeconds: 400
});

// 5. Wait, integrate, repeat
await waitFor(agent1);
git merge feature/core;

// 6. Spawn dependent agents...

// 7. Final review
git checkout main
pytest tests/ -v

References

  • Research paper: "Effective Strategies for Asynchronous Software Engineering Agents" (arXiv:2603.21489v1)
  • Original name: CAID (Centralized Asynchronous Isolated Delegation)
  • GitHub: https://github.com/JiayiGeng/async-swe-agents

See references/examples.md for detailed implementation examples.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

89.66%
按下载量换算923

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 openclaw skills install team-code 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills