Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
AI 工具只读github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

tdd-obraTDD 奥布拉

Agent Skill

tdd-obra 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

494

周安装

21

GitHub Stars

8

下载量

173
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:tdd-obra(TDD 奥布拉)
来源仓库:https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub
仓库路径:skills/tdd-obra
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill tdd-obra
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill tdd-obra

简介

tdd-obra 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 AI 工具环境中进行项目协作管理。

  • 适用于围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行信息整理。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装使用。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否涉及联网、命令执行或文件读写。
  • 建议结合来源仓库和原始 README 进一步了解具体功能和限制。

SKILL.md

Test-Driven Development (TDD) Skill

Overview

This skill enforces strict test-first development methodology. The core principle: "Write the test first. Watch it fail. Write minimal code to pass." If you didn't watch the test fail, you don't know if it tests the right thing.

Quick Start

  1. Write one failing test - Minimal test demonstrating desired behavior
  2. Verify RED - Run test, confirm it fails (not errors)
  3. Write minimal code - Just enough to pass
  4. Verify GREEN - All tests pass
  5. Refactor - Clean up while maintaining green

When to Use

  • Starting new features or modules
  • Fixing bugs (write failing test reproducing bug first)
  • Refactoring existing code
  • Any production code development
  • Code review verification

Iron Law

Produce no production code without a failing test first.

Any code written before tests must be deleted entirely - no exceptions for keeping it as reference material.

Red-Green-Refactor Cycle

RED Phase

Write one minimal test demonstrating desired behavior:

  • Use clear, descriptive test names
  • Test real behavior, not mocks
  • One assertion focus per test

Verify RED (Mandatory)

Run tests and confirm:

  • Test fails (not errors)
  • Failure message matches expectations
  • Failure occurs because feature is missing, not due to typos

GREEN Phase

Write simplest code passing the test:

  • No over-engineering or feature additions
  • No refactoring other code
  • Implement only what satisfies the test

Verify GREEN (Mandatory)

Confirm:

  • Target test passes
  • All existing tests remain passing
  • No errors or warnings appear

REFACTOR Phase

After green only, clean up implementation:

  • Remove duplication
  • Improve naming
  • Extract helpers
  • Maintain all passing tests

Why Tests-After Fails

ApproachValidates
Tests-first"What should this do?"
Tests-after"What did I build?"

Tests written after code:

  • Pass immediately, proving nothing
  • May test the wrong thing
  • Verify implementation rather than behavior
  • Miss edge cases forgotten during coding
  • Never demonstrate the test catching real bugs

Common Rationalizations (All Invalid)

These are "Red Flags" requiring complete restart with proper TDD:

  • "Too simple to test"
  • "I'll test after"
  • "Already manually tested"
  • "Tests slow me down"
  • "I know this works"

Bug Fix Pattern

1. Write failing test reproducing the bug
2. Verify test fails for expected reason
3. Implement minimal fix
4. Verify all tests pass
5. Refactor if needed
6. Commit with test and fix together

Verification Checklist

Before completing work:

  • Every function has a test
  • Each test was watched failing first
  • Tests failed for expected reasons
  • Minimal code passes each test
  • All tests pass without warnings
  • Tests employ real code with minimal mocking
  • Edge cases and errors are covered

Best Practices

Do

  1. Write test name as behavior specification
  2. Use AAA pattern: Arrange, Act, Assert
  3. Test edge cases explicitly
  4. Keep tests independent
  5. Run full suite frequently
  6. Commit test and implementation together

Don't

  1. Write tests after implementation
  2. Test implementation details
  3. Use excessive mocking
  4. Skip verification steps
  5. Batch multiple behaviors in one test
  6. Ignore flaky tests

Error Handling

ErrorCauseSolution
Test passes immediatelyWrote code firstDelete code, start over with test
Test errors instead of failsSyntax or setup issueFix test setup, not production code
Tests pass but feature brokenTesting wrong thingReview test assertions
Flaky testsAsync or state issuesFix test isolation

Metrics

MetricTargetDescription
Test-First Rate100%Tests written before code
RED Verification100%All tests watched failing
Coverage>80%Line coverage baseline
Critical Path Coverage100%Auth, payments, security
Test Independence100%No test order dependencies

Related Skills


Version History

  • 1.0.0 (2026-01-19): Initial release adapted from obra/superpowers

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

30.76%
按下载量换算53

windsurf

25.02%
按下载量换算43

trae

16.33%
按下载量换算28

OpenCode

13.65%
按下载量换算24

Cursor

7.79%
按下载量换算13

Codex

3.98%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills