Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索external-servicegithub未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

synthesize-learnings综合学习

Agent Skill

synthesize-learnings 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

466

周安装

20

GitHub Stars

2

下载量

163
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:synthesize-learnings(综合学习)
来源仓库:https://github.com/richfrem/agent-plugins-skills
仓库路径:skills/synthesize-learnings
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/richfrem/agent-plugins-skills --skill synthesize-learnings
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/richfrem/agent-plugins-skills --skill synthesize-learnings

简介

synthesize-learnings 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。

  • 适用于学习反馈与经验积累场景,可结合来源仓库进一步核验具体用法。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认权限范围和维护状态。
  • 安装前建议确认是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写等操作。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Dependencies

This skill requires Python 3.8+ and standard library only. No external packages needed.

To install this skill's dependencies:

pip-compile ./requirements.in
pip install -r ./requirements.txt

See ./requirements.txt for the dependency lockfile (currently empty — standard library only).


Synthesize Learnings

Take raw analysis output from analyze-plugin and transform it into concrete, actionable improvements for our meta-skills ecosystem. This is the "close the loop" skill that turns observations into evolution.

Improvement Targets

Learnings are mapped to three improvement targets:

Target 1: agent-scaffolders

Improvements to the plugin/skill/hook/sub-agent scaffolding tools.

What to look for:

  • New component types or patterns that scaffold.py should support
  • Better default templates based on exemplary plugins
  • New scaffolder skills needed (e.g., creating connectors, reference files)
  • Improved acceptance criteria templates based on real-world examples

Target 2: agent-skill-open-specifications

Improvements to ecosystem standards and authoritative source documentation.

What to look for:

  • New best practices discovered from high-quality plugins
  • Anti-patterns that should be documented as warnings
  • Spec gaps where plugins do things the standards don't address
  • New pattern categories to add to ecosystem knowledge

Target 3: agent-plugin-analyzer (Self-Improvement)

Improvements to this analyzer plugin itself.

What to look for:

  • New patterns discovered that should be added to pattern-catalog.md
  • Analysis blind spots — things that should have been caught
  • Framework gaps — phases that need refinement
  • New anti-patterns to add to the detection checklist

Target 4: Domain Plugins (e.g., oracle-legacy-system-analysis)

Improvements to the primary domain plugins in this repository — especially the legacy Oracle Forms/DB analysis plugins.

What to look for:

  • Severity/classification frameworks that could improve how legacy code issues are categorized (e.g., GREEN/YELLOW/RED deviation severity from legal contract-review)
  • Playbook-based review methodology adaptable to legacy code review playbooks (standard migration positions, acceptable risk levels)
  • Confidence scoring applicable to legacy code analysis certainty levels
  • Connector abstractions (~~category patterns) for tool-agnostic Oracle analysis workflows
  • Progressive disclosure structures for organizing deep Oracle Forms/DB reference knowledge
  • Decision tables for legacy migration pathways (like chart selection guides but for migration strategies)
  • Checklist patterns for legacy system audit completeness
  • Tiered execution strategies for handling different legacy code complexity levels
  • Bootstrap/iteration modes for incremental legacy system analysis
  • Output templates (HTML artifacts, structured reports) for presenting legacy analysis results

Synthesis Process

Step 1: Gather Analysis Results

Collect all analysis reports from the current session or from referenced analysis artifacts.

Step 2: Categorize Observations

Sort every observation into one of these categories:

CategoryDescriptionMaps To
Structural InnovationNovel directory layouts, component organizationScaffolders
Content PatternReusable content structures (tables, frameworks, checklists)Specs + Catalog + Domain
Execution PatternWorkflow designs, phase structures, decision treesScaffolders + Specs + Domain
Integration PatternMCP tool usage, connector abstractions, cross-tool designSpecs + Domain
Quality PatternTesting, validation, compliance approachesScaffolders + Specs
Meta PatternSelf-referential or recursive designs (skills that build skills)Analyzer + Scaffolders
Anti-PatternThings to avoid, documented pitfallsSpecs
Domain ApplicabilityPatterns transferable to legacy code analysis workflowsDomain
Novel DiscoverySomething entirely new not in existing catalogsAll targets

Step 3: Generate Recommendations

For EACH observation, produce a structured recommendation:

### [Recommendation Title]

**Source**: [Plugin/skill where observed]
**Category**: [from table above]
**Target**: [which meta-skill to improve]
**Priority**: [high / medium / low]

**Observation**: [What was found]

**Current State**: [How our meta-skills handle this today, or "not addressed"]

**Proposed Improvement**: [Specific change to make]

**Example**: [Before/after or concrete illustration]

Step 4: Prioritize

Rank recommendations by impact:

PriorityCriteria
HighUniversal pattern found across many plugins; would improve ALL generated plugins; addresses a gap in current standards
MediumCommon pattern found in several plugins; would improve most generated plugins; refines existing standards
LowNiche pattern from specific domain; would improve specialized plugins; nice-to-have enhancement

Step 5: Update the Pattern Catalog

Append any newly discovered patterns to references/pattern-catalog.md in the analyze-plugin skill. This is the self-improvement loop — every analysis makes future analyses better.

Step 5b: Log Recommendations to Tracker

Append each recommendation to references/open-recommendations.md using this format:

| [YYYY-MM-DD] | [Title] | [Target] | [Priority] | open |

See references/open-recommendations.md for the tracker schema. When a recommendation is implemented, update its status from open to implemented and add the PR or commit reference.

Format new catalog entries as:

### [Pattern Name]
- **Category**: [Structural / Content / Execution / Integration / Quality / Meta]
- **First Seen In**: [plugin name]
- **Description**: [2-3 sentences]
- **When to Use**: [trigger conditions]
- **Example**: [brief illustration]

Step 6: Generate Summary Report

Produce a final synthesis report with:

  1. Executive Summary — 3-5 bullet points of the highest-impact learnings
  2. Recommendations by Target — Grouped by scaffolders / specs / analyzer
  3. Updated Pattern Count — How many new patterns were added to the catalog
  4. Virtuous Cycle Status — What percentage of the analysis framework was exercised and how it can be tightened

Output

The synthesis report should be a standalone markdown document suitable for:

  • Filing as a reference artifact
  • Using as a briefing for planning sessions
  • Driving specific PRs against the scaffolders and specs

Iteration Directory Isolation: Do NOT overwrite existing synthesis reports. Always output to a newly isolated directory (e.g. synthesis-reports/run-1/) so historical recommendations are preserved. Asynchronous Benchmark Metric Capture: Log the total_tokens and duration_ms consumed during the synthesis back to timing.json to track the ROI cost of this meta-analysis.

Always close with a Next Steps section listing the 3 most impactful changes to make first.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

37.22%
按下载量换算61

Claude

30.72%
按下载量换算50

Cursor

18.41%
按下载量换算30

Gemini CLI

9.67%
按下载量换算16

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills