Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
待分类权限需确认github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

supply-chain-optimizer供应链优化器

Agent Skill

supply-chain-optimizer 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

3,539

周安装

152

GitHub Stars

48

下载量

1,240
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:supply-chain-optimizer(供应链优化器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude
仓库路径:skills/supply-chain-optimizer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude --skill supply-chain-optimizer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude --skill supply-chain-optimizer

简介

supply-chain-optimizer 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态和代码变更进行整理。
  • 支持查询协作事项、代码变更历史和仓库维护状态等 GitHub 相关操作。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否会触发联网或命令执行。
  • 建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法,避免直接依赖未经验证的输出结果。

SKILL.md

name
supply-chain-optimizer
description
Supply chain analysis, inventory optimization, logistics planning, vendor evaluation, and demand forecasting frameworks. Use when analyzing supply chains, optimizing inventory, or evaluating suppliers.

Supply Chain Optimizer

Comprehensive frameworks for supply chain analysis, inventory management, logistics optimization, and vendor evaluation.

Supply Chain Mapping Template

End-to-End Supply Chain Map

RAW MATERIALS → SUPPLIERS → MANUFACTURING → DISTRIBUTION → CUSTOMER

MAPPING STEPS:
1. Identify all nodes (suppliers, plants, warehouses, customers)
2. Map material flows between nodes
3. Map information flows (orders, forecasts, POs)
4. Map financial flows (payments, invoicing)
5. Record lead times at each stage
6. Identify bottlenecks and single points of failure

NODE DETAIL TEMPLATE:
| Node           | Type       | Location  | Lead Time | Capacity | Utilization |
| -------------- | ---------- | --------- | --------- | -------- | ----------- |
|                | Supplier   |           |           |          |             |
|                | Plant      |           |           |          |             |
|                | Warehouse  |           |           |          |             |
|                | DC         |           |           |          |             |

Inventory Optimization

Economic Order Quantity (EOQ)

EOQ = sqrt(2DS / H)

Where: D = Annual demand, S = Ordering cost/order, H = Holding cost/unit/year
Total Cost = (D/Q)S + (Q/2)H + DC

Example: D=10,000, S=$50, H=$5 → EOQ = 447 units, 22.4 orders/year

Safety Stock & Reorder Point

SAFETY STOCK: SS = z x sigma_dLT
REORDER POINT: ROP = (Avg Daily Demand x Lead Time) + Safety Stock

SERVICE LEVEL FACTORS:
| Service Level | z-Score | Use Case          |
| ------------- | ------- | ----------------- |
| 90.0%         | 1.28    | Basic coverage    |
| 95.0%         | 1.65    | Standard          |
| 99.0%         | 2.33    | High service      |
| 99.9%         | 3.09    | Critical items    |

Inventory KPI Dashboard

MetricFormulaTarget
Inventory TurnsCOGS / Average InventoryIndustry-specific
Days of SupplyAverage Inventory / (COGS / 365)Minimize
Fill RateOrders Filled Complete / Total Orders97%+
Stockout RateStockout Events / Total Demand Events< 2%
Carrying Cost %Holding Costs / Average Inventory Value15-30%
Dead Stock %No-movement Items / Total SKUs< 5%
Inventory AccuracyCorrect Counts / Total Counts99%+
GMROIGross Margin / Average Inventory Cost> 2.0

ABC-XYZ Analysis Framework

ABC CLASSIFICATION (Value):
A Items: Top 20% of SKUs = ~80% of annual consumption value
  → Tight control, frequent review, accurate forecasts
B Items: Next 30% of SKUs = ~15% of value
  → Moderate control, periodic review
C Items: Bottom 50% of SKUs = ~5% of value
  → Minimal control, simple replenishment rules

XYZ CLASSIFICATION (Demand Variability):
X: Coefficient of Variation < 0.5 → Stable, predictable demand
Y: CV between 0.5 and 1.0 → Some variation, trend/seasonal
Z: CV > 1.0 → Highly irregular, sporadic demand

COMBINED MATRIX:
| Class | AX         | AY           | AZ            |
| ----- | ---------- | ------------ | ------------- |
| Strat | JIT/Kanban | Forecast     | Order on demand|
| Class | BX         | BY           | BZ            |
| Strat | Reorder pt | Buffer stock | Min/Max       |
| Class | CX         | CY           | CZ            |
| Strat | Bulk buy   | Periodic rev | Eliminate?     |

Vendor Scorecard

Supplier Evaluation Matrix

CriteriaWeightScore (1-5)Weighted ScoreNotes
Quality (PPM)25%
Delivery (OTIF)20%
Pricing20%
Responsiveness10%
Financial Health10%
Innovation5%
Sustainability5%
Risk Profile5%
Total100%__ / 5.0
RATING SCALE:
4.5-5.0  Strategic Partner — expand relationship
3.5-4.4  Preferred Supplier — maintain, develop
2.5-3.4  Approved Supplier — improvement plan required
< 2.5    Probation / Exit — find alternative

Supplier Performance Tracking

KPITargetQ1 ActualQ2 ActualQ3 ActualQ4 ActualTrend
On-Time Delivery98%+
Quality (PPM)< 500
Lead Time (days)
Price Variance+/- 2%
Response Time (hrs)< 24
Corrective Actions< 2/qtr

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

TCO = Acquisition Costs + Operating Costs + Disposal Costs

ACQUISITION COSTS:
  Purchase price
+ Shipping / freight
+ Customs / duties / tariffs
+ Procurement labor
+ Quality inspection
+ Supplier qualification
= Total Acquisition

OPERATING COSTS (over useful life):
  Maintenance & repair
+ Inventory carrying cost
+ Warranty claims
+ Downtime cost (if component fails)
+ Training / support
+ Quality failures (scrap, rework)
= Total Operating

DISPOSAL COSTS:
  Decommissioning
+ Recycling / disposal fees
+ Environmental compliance
= Total Disposal

TCO = Total Acquisition + Total Operating + Total Disposal

TCO Comparison Template

Cost ElementSupplier ASupplier BSupplier C
Unit Price
Shipping
Duties / Tariffs
Quality Cost (est.)
Inventory Carry Cost
Lead Time Cost
Risk Premium
Total TCO/Unit
Annual TCO

Demand Forecasting Methods

MethodBest ForHorizonData Required
Moving AverageStable demandShort-term3-12 periods history
Exponential SmoothTrend detectionShort-termRecent weighted data
Holt-WintersSeasonal patternsMedium-term2+ years seasonal
Linear RegressionTrend with causal factorsMedium-termDemand + drivers
ARIMAComplex time seriesShort-medium50+ data points
Machine LearningMulti-variable patternsAnyLarge datasets
Delphi / ExpertNew products, disruptionsLong-termExpert panel

Forecast Accuracy Metrics

MAD (Mean Absolute Deviation):
MAD = (1/n) x SUM(|Actual - Forecast|)

MAPE (Mean Absolute Percentage Error):
MAPE = (1/n) x SUM(|Actual - Forecast| / Actual) x 100

BIAS (Tracking Signal):
Bias = SUM(Actual - Forecast) / MAD
Target: Between -4 and +4

ACCURACY BENCHMARKS:
| Forecast Horizon | Good MAPE | Acceptable MAPE |
| ---------------- | --------- | --------------- |
| 1 month          | < 15%     | < 25%           |
| 3 months         | < 25%     | < 35%           |
| 6 months         | < 30%     | < 45%           |
| 12 months        | < 35%     | < 50%           |

Logistics Optimization

Transportation Mode Selection

ModeCost/UnitSpeedCapacityBest For
TruckMediumFastMediumRegional, door-to-door
RailLowSlowVery HighBulk, long-distance domestic
OceanVery LowVery SlowVery HighInternational, bulk cargo
AirVery HighVery FastLowHigh-value, urgent, perishable
IntermodalLow-MedMediumHighLong-distance, cost-effective

Warehouse Layout Optimization

SLOTTING STRATEGY:
Fast movers (A items) → Near shipping dock, prime pick locations
Medium movers (B items) → Middle zones
Slow movers (C items) → High racks, far locations

LAYOUT PRINCIPLES:
1. Minimize travel distance for highest-velocity items
2. Group items frequently ordered together
3. Separate receiving and shipping areas
4. Reserve staging areas for cross-docking
5. Maintain clear aisle widths for equipment

Lead Time Analysis

TOTAL LEAD TIME:
Order Processing Time
+ Supplier Manufacturing Time
+ Transportation Time
+ Receiving / Inspection Time
+ Internal Processing Time
= Total Lead Time

LEAD TIME VARIABILITY:
Track actual vs. quoted lead times over 12+ orders
Calculate standard deviation
Use for safety stock calculations

LEAD TIME REDUCTION STRATEGIES:
| Strategy              | Typical Reduction | Effort    |
| --------------------- | ----------------- | --------- |
| Vendor-managed inv.   | 30-50%            | Medium    |
| Local sourcing        | 40-70%            | High      |
| Process automation    | 10-30%            | Medium    |
| Blanket POs           | 20-40%            | Low       |
| Consignment stock     | 50-80%            | Medium    |
| 3PL consolidation     | 10-25%            | Low       |

Supply Chain Risk Assessment

Risk Identification Matrix

Risk CategoryRisk EventLikelihoodImpactScoreMitigation
SupplySingle-source failureDual-source
DemandDemand spike/collapseBuffer stock, flex
LogisticsPort congestionAlternate routes
GeopoliticalTariffs, sanctionsNearshoring
Natural DisasterEarthquake, floodGeographic diversity
CyberSystem breachSecurity protocols
QualityBatch failureInspection, redundancy
FinancialSupplier bankruptcyFinancial monitoring
RISK SCORING:
Likelihood: 1 (Rare) to 5 (Almost Certain)
Impact: 1 (Negligible) to 5 (Catastrophic)
Risk Score = Likelihood x Impact

ACTION THRESHOLDS:
20-25  Critical — immediate action, executive attention
12-19  High — mitigation plan required within 30 days
6-11   Medium — monitor quarterly, contingency plans
1-5    Low — accept or monitor annually

KPI Dashboard Template

CategoryKPITarget
CostSC Cost as % of Revenue5-10%
CostCost per OrderMinimize
ServicePerfect Order Rate95%+
ServiceOn-Time In-Full (OTIF)98%+
ServiceCustomer Fill Rate97%+
EfficiencyInventory TurnsIndustry-specific
EfficiencyCash-to-Cash CycleMinimize
EfficiencyWarehouse Utilization85%
EfficiencyForecast Accuracy (MAPE)< 20%

See Also

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

37.37%
按下载量换算463

Claude

28.06%
按下载量换算348

Cursor

18.08%
按下载量换算224

Gemini CLI

8.64%
按下载量换算107

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限需确认

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills