Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

ad-campaign-analyzer广告活动分析器

Agent Skill

ad-campaign-analyzer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

539

周安装

22

GitHub Stars

35

下载量

172
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ad-campaign-analyzer(广告活动分析器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/superamped/ai-marketing-skills
仓库路径:skills/ad-campaign-analyzer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/superamped/ai-marketing-skills --skill ad-campaign-analyzer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/superamped/ai-marketing-skills --skill ad-campaign-analyzer

简介

ad-campaign-analyzer 用于信息查找、检索与筛选,支持广告活动相关的数据匹配。

  • 适用于 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 等平台的市场研究与分析场景。
  • 通过 npx skills add 从 GitHub 安装,具体能力以项目文档为准。
  • 使用前应确认其是否访问外部数据源或执行敏感操作。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Ad Campaign Analyzer

Usage

Use when reviewing a running campaign to decide what to kill, keep, or scale. Works for daily 15-minute ad reviews, weekly creative refresh planning, and monthly performance trend reviews.

Process

Step 1: Gather Inputs

Ask the user for:

  1. Campaign data — one of:

- CSV or table with columns: ad/ad set name, impressions, clicks, conversions, spend, CPA - Pasted text from ads manager - Structured list of metrics per ad

  1. Target CPA — the maximum they're willing to pay per acquisition
  2. AOV (Average Order Value) — what they earn per conversion on the front end
  3. Product/pricing info — what they sell, offer details, known conversion benchmarks
  4. Daily budget per ad set (optional) — for scaling calculations
  5. Days running (optional) — for statistical significance judgment
  6. Historical data (optional) — from previous review for trend comparison

Step 2: Parse Campaign Data

Normalize the input into a consistent table structure:

Ad / Ad SetImpressionsClicksCTRConversionsSpendCPADays Running

Calculate any missing derived metrics:

  • CTR = clicks / impressions × 100
  • CPA = spend / conversions (∞ if 0 conversions)
  • Conversion rate = conversions / clicks × 100

Step 3: Grade Each Ad — Red / Yellow / Green

🔴 RED = STOP

Kill this ad. It's burning money.

Criteria (any one triggers Red):

  • Spent 1.5–2x target CPA with zero conversions
  • CPA is 2x+ target CPA with statistically significant spend
  • Consistently worsening metrics over multiple days with no improvement signs
  • CTR below 0.5% after 1,000+ impressions (the creative isn't connecting)

Action: Turn off immediately. Redirect budget to greens.

🟡 YELLOW = LEAVE ALONE

Don't touch it. It needs more data or is borderline.

Criteria:

  • CPA is close to target (within 0.5–1.5x) but not enough data to be confident
  • Fewer than 1,000 impressions or fewer than 20 clicks — too early to judge
  • Spend is under 1x target CPA — hasn't had a fair chance yet
  • Metrics are mixed (good CTR but low conversion, or vice versa)

Action: Do nothing. Check again tomorrow. Resist the urge to tweak.

🟢 GREEN = SCALE

This ad is working. Give it more budget.

Criteria:

  • CPA is consistently at or below target CPA
  • Has statistically significant data (generally 10+ conversions)
  • Metrics are stable or improving over time
  • CTR is healthy for the targeting type

Action: Scale using the 20% Rule — increase daily budget by 20% every 48 hours.

Step 4: Benchmark Comparison

Compare each ad's metrics against industry benchmarks:

CTR Benchmarks (by targeting type):

TargetingExpected CTR
Broad / run-of-network1–3%
Interest-based targeting2–4%
Lookalike / community-targeted3–5%

CPA Targets by Offer Price:

Offer Price RangeExpected CPA Range
$7–27 (low ticket)$20–40
$37–97 (mid ticket)$40–120
$97+ (high ticket)Varies — must model LTV

Step 4b: Funnel Debugging — Find the Leak

Before changing creative, check whether the ad is actually the problem. Work from the surface inward:

  1. Creative — Is the CTR acceptable? Low CTR = the ad isn't connecting. Test new hooks, visuals, or headlines.
  2. Landing page — CTR is fine but conversions are flat? The LP is the problem.
  3. Messaging — LP structure looks okay but still no conversions? The fundamental message may not be resonating.
  4. Product and pricing — Different angles all fail? The offer itself may be the issue.
  5. Market — Everything above looks solid but the right people still aren't converting? The segment may be wrong.

Work from #1 → #5 in order. Most founders jump to #3 or #4 when the actual problem is #1 or #2.

Data thresholds — don't debug on noise:

  • < 1,000 impressions per ad variant: Too early to judge CTR.
  • < 100 LP visitors: Too early to judge landing page conversion.
  • < 10 conversions on a green ad: Scale cautiously — the trend may not hold.

Step 5: Flag Creative Fatigue

Check for fatigue signals across the data:

  • Declining CTR over time (even if still "okay" in absolute terms)
  • Rising CPA despite no changes to targeting or budget
  • Dropping conversion rate with stable traffic quality
  • Frequency above 3 (same people seeing the ad too many times)

If fatigue is detected, flag which ads are affected and recommend:

  • New creative variation (different angle, format, or style)
  • Audience refresh (new targeting or exclusions)
  • Copy refresh (same visual, new headline)

Step 6: Profitability Check

The North Star: Is AOV > CPA?

For each green ad, calculate:

  • Profit per conversion = AOV − CPA
  • ROAS = AOV / CPA (must be > 1.0 to be profitable)
  • Break-even CPA = AOV (you make $0 at this point)
  • Margin at current CPA = (AOV − CPA) / AOV × 100

Step 6b: LTV:CAC Health Check

If LTV data is available, assess the pricing-level health of the campaign:

LTV:CAC Ratio Benchmarks:

Pricing FunctionAverage LTV:CAC
No pricing function1.68
Yearly pricing review3.23
Continuous optimization11.09

Interpret the ratio:

  • < 1:1 — Losing money on every customer. Stop spending until unit economics are fixed.
  • 1:1 – 3:1 — Marginal. Campaigns may appear profitable on front-end ROAS but are destroying value over time.
  • 3:1 – 5:1 — Healthy. Scale greens confidently.
  • > 5:1 — Excellent. May be under-investing in acquisition.

Monetization impact reminder: A 1% improvement in monetization yields a 12.7% increase in bottom-line revenue — roughly 4x the impact of acquisition and 2x the impact of retention. If LTV:CAC is weak, the fix may be pricing, not ads.

Step 6c: Attribution Notes

When analyzing multi-channel campaigns, note attribution limitations:

  • Single-channel campaigns: last-click is sufficient.
  • Multi-channel campaigns: flag that attribution is approximate.
  • Don't over-complicate analytics. The goal is action (red/yellow/green), not perfect measurement.

Step 7: Generate Scaling Recommendations

For each green ad, provide specific scaling numbers:

The 20% Rule:

  • Current daily budget → recommended new budget (current × 1.2)
  • When to apply: 48 hours after last budget change
  • Next check-in date

For the overall campaign:

  • Total daily spend recommendation
  • Budget reallocation from reds to greens
  • When to add new creatives to the mix

Output Format

# Campaign Analysis

**Date:** [current date]
**Campaign:** [campaign name or description]
**Period:** [date range of data]
**Target CPA:** $[amount]
**AOV:** $[amount]

---

## Traffic Light Summary

| Grade | Count | % of Spend |
|-------|-------|-----------|
| 🔴 Red (Stop) | X | X% |
| 🟡 Yellow (Wait) | X | X% |
| 🟢 Green (Scale) | X | X% |

**Campaign Health:** [Healthy / Needs Attention / Critical] — [one sentence summary]

---

## Ad-Level Grades

| Ad / Ad Set | Grade | Spend | CPA | Target CPA | CTR | Conv. | Action |
|-------------|-------|-------|-----|-----------|-----|-------|--------|
| [name] | 🔴 | $X | $X | $X | X% | X | Stop — [reason] |
| [name] | 🟡 | $X | $X | $X | X% | X | Wait — [reason] |
| [name] | 🟢 | $X | $X | $X | X% | X | Scale to $X/day |

---

## Benchmark Comparison

| Metric | Your Average | Benchmark | Status |
|--------|-------------|-----------|--------|
| CTR | X% | X–X% | ✅ On track / ⚠️ Below / 🔥 Above |
| Conversion Rate | X% | X–X% | ✅ / ⚠️ / 🔥 |
| CPA | $X | $X–X | ✅ / ⚠️ / 🔥 |

---

## Creative Fatigue Alerts

[List any ads showing fatigue signals, or "No fatigue signals detected."]

---

## Profitability

| Ad / Ad Set | CPA | AOV | Profit/Conv. | ROAS | Margin |
|-------------|-----|-----|-------------|------|--------|
| [name] | $X | $X | $X | X.Xx | X% |

**Overall ROAS:** X.Xx
**Overall Profit/Conversion:** $X

---

## Action Items

### Immediate (Today)
- [ ] Stop: [list red ads]
- [ ] Scale: [list green ads with specific new budgets]

### This Week
- [ ] [Creative refresh, new tests, etc.]

### Review Cadence
- Next daily check: [tomorrow]
- Next weekly review: [date]
- Next monthly review: [date]

---

## Scaling Plan

| Ad | Current Budget | New Budget | Apply On | Next Increase |
|----|---------------|-----------|----------|---------------|
| [name] | $X/day | $X/day | [date] | $X/day on [date] |

**Total daily spend:** $X → $X (recommended)

Rules

  • The grading method is deliberately binary. Red means stop, not "let's give it one more day." Kill losers fast and feed winners.
  • Yellow is the discipline zone. Don't "optimize" yellows. Either there's enough data to judge or there isn't.
  • The 20% rule exists because ad platforms optimize delivery around your budget. Jumping budgets overnight resets the algorithm's learning.
  • CPA is the North Star, not CTR. A high-CTR ad that doesn't convert is worse than a low-CTR ad with great CPA.
  • These benchmarks are starting points. After 2-4 weeks, your own data becomes the benchmark.
  • If everything is red, the problem isn't the ads — it's the offer or the funnel.
  • Creative fatigue is inevitable. Plan for it. Have your next batch of creatives ready before the current ones die.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.63%
按下载量换算61

Claude

31.82%
按下载量换算55

Cursor

16.89%
按下载量换算29

Gemini CLI

8.27%
按下载量换算14

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills