Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计异常

prompt-optimizer提示优化器

Agent Skill

用于辅助提示词、系统指令、Agent 行为约束和工作流模板的整理。它适合让 Agent 规范任务边界、统一输出格式、拆分操作步骤或优化提示词可复用性。使用时需要保留真实业务约束,不要把示例当硬规则;涉及自动执行、外部工具或高风险操作时,应在提示词中明确确认步骤、权限边界和失败处理方式。

总安装

198

周安装

8

GitHub Stars

589

下载量

62
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:prompt-optimizer(提示优化器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills
仓库路径:skills/prompt-optimizer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills --skill prompt-optimizer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills --skill prompt-optimizer

简介

prompt-optimizer 用于辅助提示词、系统指令和行为约束的整理。

  • 适合让 Agent 规范任务边界、统一输出格式或优化提示词复用性。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装并使用。
  • 需保留真实业务约束,不要把示例当硬规则。
  • 涉及自动执行或外部工具时应明确确认步骤和权限边界。

SKILL.md

Prompt Optimizer

Overview

Evaluate prompt quality, provide targeted improvement suggestions, and generate optimized versions using 58 proven prompting techniques. This skill systematically analyzes prompts across multiple quality dimensions and applies evidence-based optimization patterns.

Quick Start

For most optimization tasks, follow this workflow:

  1. Analyze the current prompt - Read and understand what the user wants to achieve
  2. Evaluate quality - Assess across clarity, specificity, structure, completeness
  3. Load relevant techniques - Read references/prompt-techniques.md for applicable methods
  4. Generate suggestions - Use evaluation results and techniques to propose improvements
  5. Create optimized version - Apply chosen techniques to produce an enhanced prompt

Evaluation Workflow

When a user asks to optimize or evaluate a prompt:

Step 1: Load Quality Framework

Read references/quality-framework.md to understand evaluation dimensions:

  • Clarity - Is the prompt unambiguous and easy to understand?
  • Specificity - Are requirements and constraints clearly defined?
  • Structure - Does it follow logical organization?
  • Completeness - Does it include all necessary context and instructions?
  • Tone - Is the voice appropriate for the task?
  • Constraints - Are boundaries and limitations clear?

Step 2: Perform Quality Assessment

Evaluate the prompt against each dimension:

For each quality dimension:
1. Identify strengths (what works well)
2. Identify weaknesses (what's missing or unclear)
3. Rate quality (Poor/Fair/Good/Excellent)
4. Note specific improvement opportunities

Step 3: Identify Applicable Techniques

Load references/prompt-techniques.md and identify techniques that address the identified weaknesses.

Example mapping:

  • Weak: "Be creative" → Apply: Role-play or Creative Persona
  • Weak: "Write an essay" → Apply: Chain of Thought or Step-by-Step
  • Weak: "Summarize this" → Apply: Few-shot Learning with examples

Step 4: Generate Optimization Plan

Create a structured optimization plan:

  1. Priority improvements - High-impact changes that address multiple weaknesses
  2. Optional enhancements - Nice-to-have techniques that boost performance
  3. Technique combinations - Suggest technique pairings for specific use cases

Step 5: Generate Optimized Prompt

Apply the selected techniques to create an improved version:

  • Preserve original intent and requirements
  • Add structure and clarity where missing
  • Embed examples, constraints, or guidance as needed
  • Maintain appropriate tone and voice

Optimization Patterns

For common optimization scenarios, use these proven patterns:

Ambiguous Requests → Structured Breakdown

When prompt lacks clarity:

  1. Add explicit task definition
  2. Break into sub-tasks with numbered steps
  3. Include output format specification
  4. Add completion criteria

Generic Tasks → Technique Enhancement

When prompt is too broad:

  1. Apply relevant technique from references/prompt-techniques.md
  2. Add examples (few-shot) or reasoning steps (CoT)
  3. Include role or persona guidance
  4. Specify evaluation criteria

Missing Context → Scenario Framing

When prompt lacks background:

  1. Add user intent/goal statement
  2. Include target audience specification
  3. Define success metrics
  4. Add relevant constraints or boundaries

Weak Instructions → Actionable Steps

When prompt provides vague guidance:

  1. Convert abstract concepts to concrete actions
  2. Add step-by-step instructions
  3. Include quality checkpoints
  4. Specify expected output format

Script Usage

Quality Evaluation

For consistent, repeatable evaluation:

python3 scripts/evaluate.py "Your prompt here"

This provides:

  • Dimension scores (clarity, specificity, structure, completeness)
  • Overall quality rating
  • Detailed weakness analysis
  • Suggested improvement areas

Prompt Optimization

For automatic optimization generation:

python3 scripts/optimize.py "Your prompt here" --techniques "few-shot,coT"

This generates:

  • Multiple optimized prompt versions
  • Explanation of applied techniques
  • Comparison with original prompt

Note: Scripts should be used for automation or when you need deterministic results. For complex optimization tasks, use the manual workflow for more nuanced analysis.

Reference Files

references/prompt-techniques.md

Complete catalog of 58 prompting techniques including:

  • Reasoning techniques (CoT, Tree of Thoughts, Decomposition)
  • Context techniques (Few-shot, Self-Consistency, Reflection)
  • Creative techniques (Role-play, Scenario, Persona)
  • Structural techniques (Template, Framework, Checklists)
  • And 50+ more with usage examples

Load this when you need to identify applicable techniques for a specific optimization task.

references/quality-framework.md

Detailed evaluation framework with:

  • Dimension-specific criteria and rubrics
  • Scoring guidelines
  • Common anti-patterns to avoid
  • Quality benchmarks for different prompt types

Load this before any evaluation task to ensure consistent assessment.

references/optimization-patterns.md

Collection of proven optimization patterns including:

  • Pattern → Technique mappings
  • Before/after examples
  • Technique combination guidelines
  • Use-case specific templates

Load this when optimizing common prompt types (essays, code generation, analysis, etc.).

Best Practices

  1. Preserve user intent - Never change what the user wants, only how they ask for it
  2. Add incrementally - Apply one technique at a time and evaluate impact
  3. Test iteratively - After optimization, test the prompt and refine further if needed
  4. Document choices - Explain which techniques you applied and why
  5. Provide options - Offer multiple optimization versions when appropriate

When This Skill Should Trigger

This skill should be activated when:

  • User explicitly asks to "optimize," "improve," or "evaluate" a prompt
  • User asks if a prompt is "good" or "clear"
  • User wants to "fix" or "enhance" a prompt that isn't working well
  • User requests "better versions" of a prompt
  • User asks about prompt engineering techniques or best practices
  • User wants to analyze why a prompt is producing poor results

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.91%
按下载量换算22

Claude

29.55%
按下载量换算18

Cursor

21.7%
按下载量换算13

Gemini CLI

10.55%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills