Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

summarizationsummarization 搜索

Agent Skill

summarization 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

12,432

周安装

518

GitHub Stars

67

下载量

4,144
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:summarization(summarization 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jwynia/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/summarization
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/jwynia/agent-skills --skill summarization
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/jwynia/agent-skills --skill summarization

简介

summarization 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装,需结合原始 README 核验具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。
  • 当前无原始 SKILL.md 内容可参考,功能描述基于通用模板生成。

SKILL.md

Summarization

Purpose

Create effective summaries by matching summarization type to purpose, audience, and context. "Summarize" can mean many different things—this skill helps identify and execute the right approach.

Core Principle

Summarization is translation, not just reduction. Different purposes require different summary types. Clarify the need before condensing.


Clarifying Questions

Before summarizing, consider:

  1. Purpose: What will this summary be used for?

- Decision-making - Background information - Further research - Quick understanding - Reference/recall

  1. Audience: Who will read it?

- Technical experts - General audience - Decision makers - Familiar/unfamiliar with topic

  1. Scope: How comprehensive?

- Ultra-brief (single sentence) - Brief (paragraph) - Moderate (page) - Extended (multiple pages)

  1. Emphasis: What aspects are most important?

- Methodology - Findings/results - Arguments/claims - Context/background - Implications/applications

  1. Format: What structure?

- Narrative text - Bullet points - Hierarchical outline - Visual representation


Summary Type Taxonomy

Information Reduction Approaches

TypeWhat It IsWhen to Use
Key Point ExtractionIsolating the most important claimsOriginal has discrete important points
AbstractionHigher-level statements covering multiple detailsPatterns matter more than specifics
GistingCapturing essential meaning, discarding detailsOnly core message matters
CompressionShortening while preserving informationComprehensive coverage needed in less space

Structural Approaches

TypeWhat It IsWhen to Use
Executive SummaryBusiness-focused: decisions, recommendations, outcomesDocuments requiring action
Abstract/PrécisAcademic: methodology and findingsResearch papers, technical documents
TLDRUltra-brief main takeawayCasual communication, extreme brevity
OutlineHierarchical structure of main/supporting pointsLogical structure matters

Purpose-Oriented Approaches

TypeWhat It IsWhen to Use
SynthesisCombining multiple sources coherentlySummarizing across documents
Critical SummaryEvaluating claims while condensingAssessment of quality needed
Contextual SummaryFraming within broader knowledgeUnderstanding bigger picture matters
Actionable SummaryFocusing on implications and next stepsSummary will drive action

Execution by Type

Key Point Extraction

  1. Scan for topic sentences and conclusions
  2. Identify explicitly stated main ideas
  3. List each distinct point
  4. Preserve original phrasing where powerful

Example: "The author makes three main arguments: (1)..., (2)..., (3)..."

Abstraction

  1. Group related details
  2. Find common themes or patterns
  3. Create higher-level statements
  4. Reduce specifics to principles

Example: "Multiple studies consistently show..." instead of listing 12 studies

Gisting

  1. Ask: "What is the one thing to remember?"
  2. Distill to core insight
  3. Remove all supporting detail
  4. Verify essence is preserved

Example: "Remote work increases productivity for most knowledge workers."

Executive Summary

  1. State the problem/opportunity
  2. Present the solution/recommendation
  3. Highlight key benefits
  4. Note costs/risks
  5. Specify required actions

Synthesis

  1. Read all sources
  2. Identify common themes
  3. Note contradictions
  4. Find complementary information
  5. Create unified narrative

Example: "Across the five reports, three key trends emerge..."

Critical Summary

  1. Summarize the claims
  2. Evaluate the evidence
  3. Assess methodology
  4. Note limitations
  5. Conclude with assessment

Example: "While the author claims X, the evidence is limited by..."


Format Variations

Quotation-Based

  • Use key phrases verbatim
  • When precise wording is important
  • Select and organize most important quotes

Bullet Points

  • Break continuous text into discrete units
  • When quick scanning is valued
  • Make each point standalone

Progressive Summary

  • Start ultra-brief
  • Add layers of detail
  • Let reader choose depth

Comparative Summary

  • Side-by-side analysis
  • Highlight similarities and differences
  • When contrasting sources

Quality Checklist

  • Purpose is clear
  • Audience is considered
  • Scope is appropriate
  • Emphasis matches needs
  • Format serves purpose
  • Core message is preserved
  • Reduction is proportional
  • No invented information
  • Attribution where needed

Anti-Patterns

The Information Dump

Problem: Reduces length but not complexity Fix: Focus on what matters, not just what's short

The Distortion

Problem: Changes meaning through compression Fix: Verify summary against original claims

The One-Size-Fits-All

Problem: Same approach for all requests Fix: Match type to purpose and audience

The Over-Abstraction

Problem: Loses all useful specifics Fix: Preserve concrete details that support understanding


Integration Points

Inbound:

  • When asked to summarize any content
  • When processing long documents
  • When creating documentation

Outbound:

  • To decision-making processes
  • To knowledge management systems
  • To communication outputs

Complementary:

  • speech-adaptation: For spoken summaries
  • voice-analysis: For maintaining voice in summaries

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

28.86%
按下载量换算1,196

OpenCode

25.13%
按下载量换算1,041

Gemini CLI

16.51%
按下载量换算684

Antigravity

12.84%
按下载量换算532

Codex

7.02%
按下载量换算291

Cursor

3.5%
按下载量换算145

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills