Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索执行命令clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

subagent-orchestrator子 Agent 协调器

Agent Skill

subagent-orchestrator 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

27,414

周安装

1,109

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

8,606
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:subagent-orchestrator(子 Agent 协调器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/hackjsw/subagent-orchestrator
安装命令:
openclaw skills install subagent-orchestrator
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install subagent-orchestrator

简介

该技能实现子代理驱动的连续自动驾驶工作流,支持 UI、代码与验证多线并行。

  • 无需等待即可推进多轮任务,显著提升复杂项目的交付速度。
  • 适用于端到端产品开发场景,自动分配职责与合并产出物。
  • 安装前需确认是否允许后台进程与浏览器自动化,注意安全风险管控。
  • 输出为阶段性成果与最终归档包,依赖子代理实际执行,需人工最终审核。

SKILL.md

name
subagent-orchestrator
description
Orchestrate OpenClaw subagents for continuous autopilot workflows. Use when managing UI/代码/验证/档案/侦察 task lines, continuing multi-round work without waiting for the user to restate each step, cleaning finished sessions while preserving memory records, routing default models by role, or updating AGENT_TASK_BOARD / subagent handoff rules.

subagent-orchestrator

Run continuous task lines through the main controller, not by accident.

Core rules

  1. Treat autopilot as a continuous line

- Do not stop at “one run finished”. - A finished run means handoff, not “whole line done”. - Continue until one of: complete, blocked, paused by user.

  1. The main controller must directly re-dispatch

- Do not wait for the user to remind you to continue. - For every autopilot line, the main controller decides the next slice and spawns it.

  1. Keep the task board current

- Update AGENT_TASK_BOARD.md before or when dispatching the next round. - Record: goal, current round, completed items, remaining items, next slice, follow-up roles.

  1. Keep subagent replies short

- Prefer: goal / completed / files / status / next / risk. - Avoid long background restatements.

  1. Clean finished sessions, keep memory

- Finished subagent sessions do not need to be kept. - Before forgetting them, write the durable record into memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md. - Include at least: task goal, changed files, result status, risk, next step. - Promote stable collaboration rules into MEMORY.md when needed.

  1. Do not keep unnecessary artifacts

- Temporary screenshots, temp files, and intermediate outputs can be deleted when no longer needed. - If the user wants screenshot proof, prefer sending it directly instead of long-term local retention.

Role routing

Do not hard-code project-specific model rules into this skill.

Use the current session defaults unless the user or project rules override them. If a project has role-specific model preferences, keep them in project memory, task board rules, or project docs — not as universal orchestrator behavior.

Dispatch pattern

When an autopilot line is active:

  1. Read the current line from AGENT_TASK_BOARD.md
  2. Pick the next small closed slice
  3. Spawn the correct role
  4. Require short structured return
  5. On completion:

- summarize for the user - update memory - clean finished session if no longer needed - immediately dispatch the next slice if the line is still active

Cross-role coordination

Cross-role dependency pattern

When one role creates a dependency for another role:

  • the producing role must explicitly name the follow-up role in next_role
  • the main controller should dispatch that follow-up role without waiting for the user to restate it
  • do not let dependent task lines drift apart

Examples:

  • research -> UI integration
  • code logic -> validation
  • code structure -> UI presentation

Validation

Validation is a follow-up role, not usually the main line. Trigger it after:

  • a meaningful UI slice
  • a meaningful code slice
  • a user asks for proof/checks

Return protocol

Keep the canonical protocol in references/SUBAGENT_RECORD_PROTOCOL.md and use it together with this skill.

Require subagents to include these header fields before the short report:

  • tag: one of autopilot | done | idle | blocked | handoff | need_user
  • line: the task line name, such as ui-autopilot, code-autopilot, scout-art, archive-worldview
  • node: the current task-line node id, such as code-n4, ui-n5
  • goal_status: use only partial | complete | waiting | blocked (do not invent values like half_done, in_progress, done)
  • next_role: free-form next owner/role label, such as ui, code, verify, research, archive, user, none, or any project-specific role name

Then use the short body (see references/SUBAGENT_RECORD_PROTOCOL.md for the full paired format):

  1. Goal
  2. Completed (max 3-4)
  3. Changed files
  4. Status
  5. Next
  6. Risk

Tag meanings

  • autopilot: this round finished, but the whole line is probably not done; main controller must compare against the task board and either continue or close
  • done: the whole line is complete
  • idle: this role is waiting for another line or condition; do not continue this role yet
  • blocked: the line cannot safely continue automatically
  • handoff: this round finished and the next role is already clear
  • need_user: user decision is required before any safe continuation

Main-controller decision rules

When a subagent returns:

  1. If tag=done

- close the line - write memory - clean finished session

  1. If tag=autopilot

- compare against AGENT_TASK_BOARD.md - resolve the current line and node - ignore vague per-run completion phrasing in the body - if node != end_node, dispatch the next node immediately in the same controller turn - only close the line when current_node == end_node and the line completion condition is actually satisfied

Anti-drop guard

For every autopilot return, the main controller must verify all three:

  • the line exists on the task board
  • the line is not yet complete
  • a next dispatch was either sent, or the line was explicitly converted to idle, blocked, need_user, or done

If none of those happened, the turn is incomplete and should not be considered finished.

Stricter continuation rules

A local slice finishing is not enough to stop a line. Do not treat phrases like “this small closure is done”, “this round passed”, or “this piece is complete” as permission to pause.

The controller may stop only when one of these is true:

  • current_node == end_node and the line completion condition is actually satisfied
  • the return is explicitly blocked
  • the return is explicitly need_user
  • the user explicitly paused/stopped the line

If a subagent returns goal_status: complete for a node, that means:

  • the node itself finished
  • the controller must immediately resolve next_on_done
  • and dispatch the next owner in the same turn unless the line is truly at end_node

Delivery-proof rule

If a task claims a delivery/output was completed on an external surface (for example Discord/Telegram/channel/thread/board), the controller must require proof. A claim like “已上屏 / 已交付 / 已发布 / 已发送” is not sufficient by itself.

Minimum proof for delivery-type tasks:

  • target channel/thread id
  • message id (or equivalent object id)
  • a human-checkable location description

If any proof item is missing, treat the task as not delivered yet. Do not mark the line done or the node complete on verbal assurance alone.

Mandatory node advancement

After receiving a valid autopilot return with line and node, the main controller must do this in order:

  1. resolve the matching task-line in AGENT_TASK_BOARD.md
  2. resolve the current node definition
  3. advance current_node to that node's next_on_done
  4. if the advanced node is not end_node, dispatch the owner of the advanced node immediately in the same turn

Do not stop after summarizing the finished round. The turn is only complete after the node has been advanced and the next node has either been dispatched or explicitly put into idle / blocked / need_user / done.

  1. If tag=handoff

- dispatch next_role directly - update task board

  1. If tag=idle

- do not continue this role yet - mark dependency in task board - resume after the dependency line advances

  1. If tag=blocked

- stop automatic continuation - summarize blocker - ask only for the smallest required decision if needed

  1. If tag=need_user

- ask the user - do not keep other roles guessing

Completion conditions

Only mark a line done when:

  • the user says stop/pause, or
  • the task board objective is fully satisfied and no meaningful next slice remains.

Do not mark done just because one run finished.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

85.25%
按下载量换算7,337

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 openclaw skills install subagent-orchestrator 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills