Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计未展示

test-cases测试用例

Agent Skill

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

总安装

419

周安装

18

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

147
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:test-cases(测试用例)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ssdeanx/agentstack
仓库路径:skills/test-cases
安装命令:
npx skills add ssdeanx/agentstack --skill "test-cases"
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

AgentSkills.tonpx skills
npx skills add ssdeanx/agentstack --skill "test-cases"

简介

test-cases 用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试和回归验证,适合编写单元测试或分析失败日志的场景。

  • 适用于需要补充测试用例或验证功能改动的开发环境。
  • 通过 npx skills add ssdeanx/agentstack --skill "test-cases" 命令安装。
  • 需确认项目测试框架和运行命令,避免为了通过测试而修改真实逻辑。
  • test-cases 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Test Cases Generator

This skill generates comprehensive, requirement-driven test cases from PRD documents or user requirements.

Purpose

Transform product requirements into structured test cases that ensure complete coverage of functionality, edge cases, error scenarios, and state transitions. The skill follows a pragmatic testing philosophy: test what matters, ensure every requirement has corresponding test coverage, and maintain test quality over quantity.

When to Use

Trigger this skill when:

  • User provides a PRD or requirements document and requests test cases
  • User asks to "generate test cases", "create test scenarios", or "plan QA"
  • User mentions testing coverage for a feature or requirement
  • User needs structured test documentation in markdown format

Core Testing Principles

Follow these principles when generating test cases:

  1. Requirement-driven, not implementation-driven - Test cases must map directly to requirements, not implementation details
  2. Complete coverage - Every requirement must have at least one test case covering:

- Happy path (normal use cases) - Edge cases (boundary values, empty inputs, max limits) - Error handling (invalid inputs, failure scenarios, permission errors) - State transitions (if stateful, cover all valid state changes)

  1. Clear and actionable - Each test case must be executable by a QA engineer without ambiguity
  2. Traceable - Maintain clear mapping between requirements and test cases

Workflow

Step 1: Gather Requirements

First, identify the source of requirements:

  1. If user provides a file path to a PRD, read it using the Read tool
  2. If user describes requirements verbally, capture them
  3. If requirements are unclear or incomplete, use AskUserQuestion to clarify:

- What are the core user flows? - What are the acceptance criteria? - What are the edge cases or error scenarios to consider? - Are there any state transitions or workflows? - What platforms or environments need testing?

Step 2: Extract Test Scenarios

Analyze requirements and extract test scenarios:

  1. Functional scenarios - Normal use cases from requirements
  2. Edge case scenarios - Boundary conditions, empty states, maximum limits
  3. Error scenarios - Invalid inputs, permission failures, network errors
  4. State transition scenarios - If the feature involves state, map all transitions

For each requirement, identify:

  • Preconditions (what must be true before testing)
  • Test steps (actions to perform)
  • Expected results (what should happen)
  • Postconditions (state after test completes)

Step 3: Structure Test Cases

Organize test cases using this structure:

# Test Cases: [Feature Name]

## Overview

- **Feature**: [Feature name]
- **Requirements Source**: [PRD file path or description]
- **Test Coverage**: [Summary of what's covered]
- **Last Updated**: [Date]

## Test Case Categories

### 1. Functional Tests

Test cases covering normal user flows and core functionality.

#### TC-F-001: [Test Case Title]

- **Requirement**: [Link to specific requirement]
- **Priority**: [High/Medium/Low]
- **Preconditions**:
    - [Condition 1]
    - [Condition 2]
- **Test Steps**:
    1. [Step 1]
    2. [Step 2]
    3. [Step 3]
- **Expected Results**:
    - [Expected result 1]
    - [Expected result 2]
- **Postconditions**: [State after test]

### 2. Edge Case Tests

Test cases covering boundary conditions and unusual inputs.

#### TC-E-001: [Test Case Title]

[Same structure as above]

### 3. Error Handling Tests

Test cases covering error scenarios and failure modes.

#### TC-ERR-001: [Test Case Title]

[Same structure as above]

### 4. State Transition Tests

Test cases covering state changes and workflows (if applicable).

#### TC-ST-001: [Test Case Title]

[Same structure as above]

## Test Coverage Matrix

| Requirement ID | Test Cases         | Coverage Status |
| -------------- | ------------------ | --------------- |
| REQ-001        | TC-F-001, TC-E-001 | ✓ Complete      |
| REQ-002        | TC-F-002           | ⚠ Partial       |

## Notes

- [Any additional testing considerations]
- [Known limitations or assumptions]

Step 4: Generate Test Cases

For each identified scenario, create a detailed test case following the structure above. Ensure:

  1. Unique IDs - Use prefixes: TC-F (functional), TC-E (edge), TC-ERR (error), TC-ST (state)
  2. Clear titles - Descriptive titles that explain what's being tested
  3. Requirement traceability - Link each test case to specific requirements
  4. Priority assignment - Mark critical paths as High priority
  5. Executable steps - Steps must be clear enough for any QA engineer to execute
  6. Measurable results - Expected results must be verifiable

Step 5: Validate Coverage

Before finalizing, verify:

  1. Every requirement has at least one test case
  2. Happy path is covered for all user flows
  3. Edge cases are identified for boundary conditions
  4. Error scenarios are covered for failure modes
  5. State transitions are tested if feature is stateful

If coverage gaps exist, generate additional test cases.

Step 6: Output Test Cases

Write the test cases to tests/<name>-test-cases.md where <name> is derived from:

  • The feature name from the PRD
  • The user's specified name
  • A sanitized version of the requirement title

Use the Write tool to create the file with the structured test cases.

Step 7: Summary

After generating test cases, provide a brief summary in Chinese:

  • Total number of test cases generated
  • Coverage breakdown (functional, edge, error, state)
  • Any assumptions made or areas needing clarification
  • File path where test cases were saved

Quality Checklist

Before finalizing test cases, verify:

  • Every requirement has corresponding test cases
  • Happy path scenarios are covered
  • Edge cases include boundary values, empty inputs, max limits
  • Error handling covers invalid inputs and failure scenarios
  • State transitions are tested if applicable
  • Test case IDs are unique and follow naming convention
  • Test steps are clear and executable
  • Expected results are measurable and verifiable
  • Coverage matrix shows complete coverage
  • File is written to tests/-test-cases.md

Example Usage

User: "Generate test cases for the user authentication feature in docs/auth-prd.md"

Process:

  1. Read docs/auth-prd.md
  2. Extract requirements: login, logout, password reset, session management
  3. Identify scenarios: successful login, invalid credentials, expired session, etc.
  4. Generate test cases covering all scenarios
  5. Write to tests/auth-test-cases.md
  6. Summarize coverage in Chinese

References

For detailed testing methodologies and best practices, see:

  • references/testing-principles.md - Core testing principles and patterns

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

26.22%
按下载量换算39

Antigravity

24.77%
按下载量换算36

windsurf

15.56%
按下载量换算23

trae

12.99%
按下载量换算19

OpenCode

7.34%
按下载量换算11

Codex

3.04%
按下载量换算4

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills