Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
AI 工具只读github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

sql-proSQL 专业版

Agent Skill

用于辅助数据库表结构、查询语句、迁移脚本和数据维护任务。它适合让 Agent 分析 schema、编写 SQL、排查查询问题、整理索引或生成迁移建议。使用时需要明确数据库类型、连接环境和目标表,区分只读分析与写入变更;涉及删除、更新、迁移和批量导入时,应优先 dry-run、备份或事务保护,避免误操作。

总安装

2,210

周安装

93

GitHub Stars

76

下载量

774
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:sql-pro(SQL 专业版)
来源仓库:https://github.com/404kidwiz/claude-supercode-skills
仓库路径:skills/sql-pro
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/404kidwiz/claude-supercode-skills --skill sql-pro
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/404kidwiz/claude-supercode-skills --skill sql-pro

简介

集成高级 SQL 功能支持,增强复杂查询构建能力。

  • 适用于报表生成、ETL 流程或数据分析任务。
  • 提供窗口函数、CTE 等现代语法辅助实现。
  • 使用前应确认目标数据库版本兼容性。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。
  • sql-pro 属于AI 工具类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

SQL Pro

Purpose

Provides expert SQL development capabilities across major database platforms (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server, Oracle), specializing in complex query design, performance optimization, and database architecture. Masters ANSI SQL standards, platform-specific optimizations, and modern data patterns with focus on efficiency and scalability.

When to Use

  • Writing complex SQL queries with joins, CTEs, window functions, or recursive queries
  • Designing database schema for new application or refactoring existing schema
  • Optimizing slow SQL queries with execution plan analysis
  • Data migration between different database platforms (MySQL → PostgreSQL)
  • Implementing stored procedures, functions, or triggers
  • Building analytical reports with advanced aggregations and window functions
  • Translating business requirements into SQL query logic
  • Cross-platform SQL compatibility issues (different dialects)

Quick Start

Invoke this skill when:

  • Writing complex queries with CTEs, window functions, or recursive patterns
  • Designing or refactoring database schemas
  • Optimizing slow queries with execution plan analysis
  • Migrating data between different database platforms
  • Implementing stored procedures, functions, or triggers
  • Building analytical reports with advanced aggregations

Do NOT invoke when:

  • PostgreSQL-specific features needed → Use postgres-pro
  • MySQL-specific administration → Use database-administrator
  • Simple CRUD operations → Use backend-developer
  • ORM query patterns → Use appropriate language skill

Decision Framework

CTE vs Subquery vs JOIN Decision Tree

Query Requirement Analysis
│
├─ Need to reference result multiple times?
│  └─ YES → Use CTE (avoids duplicate subquery evaluation)
│     WITH user_totals AS (SELECT ...)
│     SELECT * FROM user_totals WHERE ...
│     UNION ALL
│     SELECT * FROM user_totals WHERE ...
│
├─ Recursive data traversal (hierarchy, graph)?
│  └─ YES → Use Recursive CTE (ONLY option for recursion)
│     WITH RECURSIVE tree AS (
│       SELECT ... -- anchor
│       UNION ALL
│       SELECT ... FROM tree ... -- recursive
│     )
│
├─ Simple lookup or filter?
│  └─ Use JOIN (most optimizable by query planner)
│     SELECT u.*, o.total
│     FROM users u
│     JOIN orders o ON u.id = o.user_id
│
├─ Correlated subquery in WHERE clause?
│  ├─ Checking existence → Use EXISTS (stops at first match)
│  │  WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM orders WHERE user_id = u.id)
│  │
│  └─ Value comparison → Use JOIN instead
│     -- BAD: WHERE (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM orders WHERE user_id = users.id) > 5
│     -- GOOD: JOIN (SELECT user_id, COUNT(*) as cnt FROM orders GROUP BY user_id)
│
└─ Readability vs Performance trade-off?
   ├─ Complex logic, readability critical → CTE
   │  (Easier to understand, debug, maintain)
   │
   └─ Performance critical, simple logic → Subquery or JOIN
      (Query planner can inline and optimize)

Window Function vs GROUP BY Decision Matrix

RequirementSolutionExample
Need aggregation + row-level detailWindow functionSELECT name, salary, AVG(salary) OVER () as avg_salary FROM employees
Only aggregated results neededGROUP BYSELECT dept, AVG(salary) FROM employees GROUP BY dept
Ranking/row numberingWindow function (ROW_NUMBER, RANK, DENSE_RANK)ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY sales DESC)
Running totals / moving averagesWindow function with frameSUM(amount) OVER (ORDER BY date ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW)
LAG/LEAD (access previous/next rows)Window functionLAG(price, 1) OVER (ORDER BY date) as prev_price
Percentile / NTILEWindow functionNTILE(4) OVER (ORDER BY score) as quartile
Simple count/sum/avg by groupGROUP BY (more efficient)SELECT category, COUNT(*) FROM products GROUP BY category

Red Flags → Escalate to Oracle

ObservationWhy EscalateExample
Cartesian product in execution planUnintended cross join causing exponential rows"Query returning millions of rows"
Complex multi-level recursive CTE performanceAdvanced optimization needed"Recursive CTE traversing 10+ levels with 100K nodes"
Cross-platform migration with incompatible featuresPlatform-specific feature mapping"Migrating Oracle CONNECT BY to PostgreSQL recursive CTE"
Query with 10+ joins and complex logicArchitecture smell, potential redesign"Single query joining 15 tables"
Temporal query with complex time-series logicAdvanced analytical pattern"SCD Type 2 with historical snapshots"

Core Capabilities

Advanced Query Patterns

  • Common Table Expressions (CTEs) and recursive queries
  • Window functions: ROW_NUMBER, RANK, LEAD, LAG, aggregate windows
  • PIVOT/UNPIVOT operations for data transformation
  • Hierarchical queries for tree/graph structures
  • Temporal queries for time-based analysis

Query Optimization

  • Execution plan analysis and interpretation
  • Index selection strategies and covering indexes
  • Statistics management and maintenance
  • Query hints and plan guides (when necessary)
  • Parallel query execution tuning

Index Design Patterns

  • Clustered vs. non-clustered indexes
  • Covering indexes for query optimization
  • Filtered/partial indexes for selective queries
  • Function-based/indexes on expressions
  • Composite index column ordering

Quality Checklist

Query Performance:

  • Execution time meets requirements (OLTP: <100ms, Analytics: <5s)
  • EXPLAIN ANALYZE reviewed for all complex queries
  • No sequential scans on large tables (unless intended)
  • Indexes utilized effectively (check execution plan)
  • No N+1 query patterns (correlated subqueries eliminated)

SQL Quality:

  • Only necessary columns in SELECT (no SELECT *)
  • Explicit table aliases used in multi-table queries
  • Proper NULL handling (COALESCE, IS NULL vs = NULL)
  • Data types match in comparisons (no implicit conversions)
  • Parameterized queries used (SQL injection prevention)

Optimization:

  • Window functions used instead of self-joins where applicable
  • EXISTS used instead of NOT IN for better NULL handling
  • Covering indexes suggested for frequent queries
  • Query rewritten to eliminate correlated subqueries

Documentation:

  • Complex query logic explained in comments
  • CTE names descriptive and self-documenting
  • Expected output format documented
  • Performance characteristics documented

Additional Resources

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

28.84%
按下载量换算223

OpenCode

21.93%
按下载量换算170

Codex

17.32%
按下载量换算134

Gemini CLI

12.62%
按下载量换算98

Cursor

8.36%
按下载量换算65

Antigravity

3.82%
按下载量换算30

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills