sparc-pseudocode（sparc 伪代码）

SPARC Pseudocode Agent

Algorithm design specialist focused on translating specifications into clear, efficient algorithmic logic for the SPARC methodology.

Quick Start

# Invoke SPARC Pseudocode phase

# Or directly in Claude Code
# "Use SPARC pseudocode to design the login flow algorithm"

When to Use

• Translating specifications into algorithmic solutions
• Designing data structures for optimal performance
• Analyzing time and space complexity
• Selecting appropriate design patterns
• Creating implementation roadmaps for developers

Prerequisites

• Completed specification phase with clear requirements
• Understanding of data structure trade-offs
• Knowledge of common algorithm patterns
• Familiarity with complexity analysis

Core Concepts

SPARC Pseudocode Phase

The Pseudocode phase bridges specifications and implementation:

1. Design algorithmic solutions - Language-agnostic logic
2. Select optimal data structures - Based on access patterns
3. Analyze complexity - Time and space requirements
4. Identify design patterns - Reusable solutions
5. Create implementation roadmap - Guide for developers

Complexity Classes

Implementation Pattern

Algorithm Structure

ALGORITHM: AuthenticateUser
INPUT: email (string), password (string)
OUTPUT: user (User object) or error

BEGIN
    // Validate inputs
    IF email is empty OR password is empty THEN
        RETURN error("Invalid credentials")
    END IF

    // Retrieve user from database
    user <- Database.findUserByEmail(email)

    IF user is null THEN
        RETURN error("User not found")
    END IF

    // Verify password
    isValid <- PasswordHasher.verify(password, user.passwordHash)

    IF NOT isValid THEN
        // Log failed attempt
        SecurityLog.logFailedLogin(email)
        RETURN error("Invalid credentials")
    END IF

    // Create session
    session <- CreateUserSession(user)

    RETURN {user: user, session: session}
END

Data Structure Selection

DATA STRUCTURES:

UserCache:
    Type: LRU Cache with TTL
    Size: 10,000 entries
    TTL: 5 minutes
    Purpose: Reduce database queries for active users

    Operations:
        - get(userId): O(1)
        - set(userId, userData): O(1)
        - evict(): O(1)

PermissionTree:
    Type: Trie (Prefix Tree)
    Purpose: Efficient permission checking

    Structure:
        root
        +-- users
        |   +-- read
        |   +-- write
        |   +-- delete
        +-- admin
            +-- system
            +-- users

    Operations:
        - hasPermission(path): O(m) where m = path length
        - addPermission(path): O(m)
        - removePermission(path): O(m)

Algorithm Patterns

PATTERN: Rate Limiting (Token Bucket)

ALGORITHM: CheckRateLimit
INPUT: userId (string), action (string)
OUTPUT: allowed (boolean)

CONSTANTS:
    BUCKET_SIZE = 100
    REFILL_RATE = 10 per second

BEGIN
    bucket <- RateLimitBuckets.get(userId + action)

    IF bucket is null THEN
        bucket <- CreateNewBucket(BUCKET_SIZE)
        RateLimitBuckets.set(userId + action, bucket)
    END IF

    // Refill tokens based on time elapsed
    currentTime <- GetCurrentTime()
    elapsed <- currentTime - bucket.lastRefill
    tokensToAdd <- elapsed * REFILL_RATE

    bucket.tokens <- MIN(bucket.tokens + tokensToAdd, BUCKET_SIZE)
    bucket.lastRefill <- currentTime

    // Check if request allowed
    IF bucket.tokens >= 1 THEN
        bucket.tokens <- bucket.tokens - 1
        RETURN true
    ELSE
        RETURN false
    END IF
END

Configuration

# sparc-pseudocode-config.yaml
pseudocode_settings:
  syntax_style: "structured"  # structured, functional, mixed
  include_complexity: true
  include_subroutines: true

complexity_analysis:
  report_time: true
  report_space: true
  include_best_case: false
  include_worst_case: true
  include_average_case: true

patterns:
  catalog: ["strategy", "observer", "factory", "singleton", "decorator"]
  document_rationale: true

Usage Examples

Example 1: Search Algorithm

ALGORITHM: OptimizedSearch
INPUT: query (string), filters (object), limit (integer)
OUTPUT: results (array of items)

SUBROUTINES:
    BuildSearchIndex()
    ScoreResult(item, query)
    ApplyFilters(items, filters)

BEGIN
    // Phase 1: Query preprocessing
    normalizedQuery <- NormalizeText(query)
    queryTokens <- Tokenize(normalizedQuery)

    // Phase 2: Index lookup
    candidates <- SET()
    FOR EACH token IN queryTokens DO
        matches <- SearchIndex.get(token)
        candidates <- candidates UNION matches
    END FOR

    // Phase 3: Scoring and ranking
    scoredResults <- []
    FOR EACH item IN candidates DO
        IF PassesPrefilter(item, filters) THEN
            score <- ScoreResult(item, queryTokens)
            scoredResults.append({item: item, score: score})
        END IF
    END FOR

    // Phase 4: Sort and filter
    scoredResults.sortByDescending(score)
    finalResults <- ApplyFilters(scoredResults, filters)

    // Phase 5: Pagination
    RETURN finalResults.slice(0, limit)
END

SUBROUTINE: ScoreResult
INPUT: item, queryTokens
OUTPUT: score (float)

BEGIN
    score <- 0

    // Title match (highest weight)
    titleMatches <- CountTokenMatches(item.title, queryTokens)
    score <- score + (titleMatches * 10)

    // Description match (medium weight)
    descMatches <- CountTokenMatches(item.description, queryTokens)
    score <- score + (descMatches * 5)

    // Tag match (lower weight)
    tagMatches <- CountTokenMatches(item.tags, queryTokens)
    score <- score + (tagMatches * 2)

    // Boost by recency
    daysSinceUpdate <- (CurrentDate - item.updatedAt).days
    recencyBoost <- 1 / (1 + daysSinceUpdate * 0.1)
    score <- score * recencyBoost

    RETURN score
END

Example 2: Design Patterns

PATTERN: Strategy Pattern

INTERFACE: AuthenticationStrategy
    authenticate(credentials): User or Error

CLASS: EmailPasswordStrategy IMPLEMENTS AuthenticationStrategy
    authenticate(credentials):
        // Email/password logic

CLASS: OAuthStrategy IMPLEMENTS AuthenticationStrategy
    authenticate(credentials):
        // OAuth logic

CLASS: AuthenticationContext
    strategy: AuthenticationStrategy

    executeAuthentication(credentials):
        RETURN strategy.authenticate(credentials)

---

PATTERN: Observer Pattern

CLASS: EventEmitter
    listeners: Map<eventName, List<callback>>

    on(eventName, callback):
        IF NOT listeners.has(eventName) THEN
            listeners.set(eventName, [])
        END IF
        listeners.get(eventName).append(callback)

    emit(eventName, data):
        IF listeners.has(eventName) THEN
            FOR EACH callback IN listeners.get(eventName) DO
                callback(data)
            END FOR
        END IF

Example 3: Complexity Analysis

ANALYSIS: User Authentication Flow

Time Complexity:
    - Email validation: O(1)
    - Database lookup: O(log n) with index
    - Password verification: O(1) - fixed bcrypt rounds
    - Session creation: O(1)
    - Total: O(log n)

Space Complexity:
    - Input storage: O(1)
    - User object: O(1)
    - Session data: O(1)
    - Total: O(1)

ANALYSIS: Search Algorithm

Time Complexity:
    - Query preprocessing: O(m) where m = query length
    - Index lookup: O(k * log n) where k = token count
    - Scoring: O(p) where p = candidate count
    - Sorting: O(p log p)
    - Filtering: O(p)
    - Total: O(p log p) dominated by sorting

Space Complexity:
    - Token storage: O(k)
    - Candidate set: O(p)
    - Scored results: O(p)
    - Total: O(p)

Optimization Notes:
    - Use inverted index for O(1) token lookup
    - Implement early termination for large result sets
    - Consider approximate algorithms for >10k results

Execution Checklist

• Read and understand specifications
• Design main algorithm with clear INPUT/OUTPUT
• Identify subroutines and helper functions
• Select appropriate data structures
• Write complexity analysis (time and space)
• Identify applicable design patterns
• Document optimization opportunities
• Review for edge cases
• Validate against specifications

Best Practices

1. Language Agnostic: Don't use language-specific syntax
2. Clear Logic: Focus on algorithm flow, not implementation details
3. Handle Edge Cases: Include error handling in pseudocode
4. Document Complexity: Always analyze time/space complexity
5. Use Meaningful Names: Variable names should explain purpose
6. Modular Design: Break complex algorithms into subroutines

Error Handling

Metrics & Success Criteria

• All algorithms have documented complexity
• Subroutines are clearly defined
• Data structures are justified with operations
• Design patterns are identified where applicable
• Pseudocode is language-agnostic

Integration Points

MCP Tools

// Store pseudocode phase completion
  action: "store",
  key: "sparc/pseudocode/algorithms",
  namespace: "coordination",
  value: JSON.stringify({
    algorithms: ["AuthenticateUser", "CheckRateLimit"],
    patterns: ["strategy", "observer"],
    complexity: "O(log n)",
    timestamp: Date.now()
  })
}

Hooks

# Pre-pseudocode hook

# Post-pseudocode hook

Related Skills

• sparc-specification - Previous phase: requirements
• sparc-architecture - Next phase: system design
• sparc-refinement - TDD implementation phase

References

• Big O Notation
• Design Patterns

Version History

• 1.0.0 (2026-01-02): Initial release - converted from agent to skill format