Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

social-media-analyzer社交媒体分析器

Agent Skill

social-media-analyzer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

9,816

周安装

409

GitHub Stars

13,166

下载量

3,272
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:social-media-analyzer(社交媒体分析器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/social-media-analyzer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill social-media-analyzer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill social-media-analyzer

简介

社交媒体活动的参与度指标、投资回报率计算和平台基准测试。

  • 计算 Instagram、Facebook、Twitter/X、LinkedIn 和 TikTok 上的参与率、点击率、覆盖率、病毒式传播率和保存率
  • 将实际性能与特定于平台的基准和性能评级(优秀、良好、平均、差)进行比较
  • 在提供广告支出时计算 ROI 和成本指标(CPE、CPC、CPM),并估算每种操作类型的参与度价值
  • 识别表现最好和最差的帖子,标记表现问题(尽管覆盖率很高,但参与度较低),并生成可行的建议

SKILL.md

Social Media Analyzer

Campaign performance analysis with engagement metrics, ROI calculations, and platform benchmarks.


Table of Contents


Analysis Workflow

Analyze social media campaign performance:

  1. Validate input data completeness (reach > 0, dates valid)
  2. Calculate engagement metrics per post
  3. Aggregate campaign-level metrics
  4. Calculate ROI if ad spend provided
  5. Compare against platform benchmarks
  6. Identify top and bottom performers
  7. Generate recommendations
  8. Validation: Engagement rate < 100%, ROI matches spend data

Input Requirements

FieldRequiredDescription
platformYesinstagram, facebook, twitter, linkedin, tiktok
posts[]YesArray of post data
posts[].likesYesLike/reaction count
posts[].commentsYesComment count
posts[].reachYesUnique users reached
posts[].impressionsNoTotal views
posts[].sharesNoShare/retweet count
posts[].savesNoSave/bookmark count
posts[].clicksNoLink clicks
total_spendNoAd spend (for ROI)

Data Validation Checks

Before analysis, verify:

  • Reach > 0 for all posts (avoid division by zero)
  • Engagement counts are non-negative
  • Date range is valid (start < end)
  • Platform is recognized
  • Spend > 0 if ROI requested

Engagement Metrics

Engagement Rate Calculation

Engagement Rate = (Likes + Comments + Shares + Saves) / Reach × 100

Metric Definitions

MetricFormulaInterpretation
Engagement RateEngagements / Reach × 100Audience interaction level
CTRClicks / Impressions × 100Content click appeal
Reach RateReach / Followers × 100Content distribution
Virality RateShares / Impressions × 100Share-worthiness
Save RateSaves / Reach × 100Content value

Performance Categories

RatingEngagement RateAction
Excellent> 6%Scale and replicate
Good3-6%Optimize and expand
Average1-3%Test improvements
Poor< 1%Analyze and pivot

ROI Calculation

Calculate return on ad spend:

  1. Sum total engagements across posts
  2. Calculate cost per engagement (CPE)
  3. Calculate cost per click (CPC) if clicks available
  4. Estimate engagement value using benchmark rates
  5. Calculate ROI percentage
  6. Validation: ROI = (Value - Spend) / Spend × 100

ROI Formulas

MetricFormula
Cost Per Engagement (CPE)Total Spend / Total Engagements
Cost Per Click (CPC)Total Spend / Total Clicks
Cost Per Thousand (CPM)(Spend / Impressions) × 1000
Return on Ad Spend (ROAS)Revenue / Ad Spend

Engagement Value Estimates

ActionValueRationale
Like$0.50Brand awareness
Comment$2.00Active engagement
Share$5.00Amplification
Save$3.00Intent signal
Click$1.50Traffic value

ROI Interpretation

ROI %RatingRecommendation
> 500%ExcellentScale budget significantly
200-500%GoodIncrease budget moderately
100-200%AcceptableOptimize before scaling
0-100%Break-evenReview targeting and creative
< 0%NegativePause and restructure

Platform Benchmarks

Engagement Rate by Platform

PlatformAverageGoodExcellent
Instagram1.22%3-6%>6%
Facebook0.07%0.5-1%>1%
Twitter/X0.05%0.1-0.5%>0.5%
LinkedIn2.0%3-5%>5%
TikTok5.96%8-15%>15%

CTR by Platform

PlatformAverageGoodExcellent
Instagram0.22%0.5-1%>1%
Facebook0.90%1.5-2.5%>2.5%
LinkedIn0.44%1-2%>2%
TikTok0.30%0.5-1%>1%

CPC by Platform

PlatformAverageGood
Facebook$0.97<$0.50
Instagram$1.20<$0.70
LinkedIn$5.26<$3.00
TikTok$1.00<$0.50

See references/platform-benchmarks.md for complete benchmark data.


Tools

Calculate Metrics

python scripts/calculate_metrics.py assets/sample_input.json

Calculates engagement rate, CTR, reach rate for each post and campaign totals.

Analyze Performance

python scripts/analyze_performance.py assets/sample_input.json

Generates full performance analysis with ROI, benchmarks, and recommendations.

Output includes:

  • Campaign-level metrics
  • Post-by-post breakdown
  • Benchmark comparisons
  • Top performers ranked
  • Actionable recommendations

Examples

Sample Input

See assets/sample_input.json:

{
  "platform": "instagram",
  "total_spend": 500,
  "posts": [
    {
      "post_id": "post_001",
      "content_type": "image",
      "likes": 342,
      "comments": 28,
      "shares": 15,
      "saves": 45,
      "reach": 5200,
      "impressions": 8500,
      "clicks": 120
    }
  ]
}

Sample Output

See assets/expected_output.json:

{
  "campaign_metrics": {
    "total_engagements": 1521,
    "avg_engagement_rate": 8.36,
    "ctr": 1.55
  },
  "roi_metrics": {
    "total_spend": 500.0,
    "cost_per_engagement": 0.33,
    "roi_percentage": 660.5
  },
  "insights": {
    "overall_health": "excellent",
    "benchmark_comparison": {
      "engagement_status": "excellent",
      "engagement_benchmark": "1.22%",
      "engagement_actual": "8.36%"
    }
  }
}

Interpretation

The sample campaign shows:

  • Engagement rate 8.36% vs 1.22% benchmark = Excellent (6.8x above average)
  • CTR 1.55% vs 0.22% benchmark = Excellent (7x above average)
  • ROI 660% = Outstanding return on $500 spend
  • Recommendation: Scale budget, replicate successful elements

Reference Documentation

Platform Benchmarks

references/platform-benchmarks.md contains:

  • Engagement rate benchmarks by platform and industry
  • CTR benchmarks for organic and paid content
  • Cost benchmarks (CPC, CPM, CPE)
  • Content type performance by platform
  • Optimal posting times and frequency
  • ROI calculation formulas

Proactive Triggers

  • Engagement rate below platform average → Content isn't resonating. Analyze top performers for patterns.
  • Follower growth stalled → Content distribution or frequency issue. Audit posting patterns.
  • High impressions, low engagement → Reach without resonance. Content quality issue.
  • Competitor outperforming significantly → Content gap. Analyze their successful posts.

Output Artifacts

When you ask for...You get...
"Social media audit"Performance analysis across platforms with benchmarks
"What's performing?"Top content analysis with patterns and recommendations
"Competitor social analysis"Competitive social media comparison with gaps

Communication

All output passes quality verification:

  • Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
  • Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act
  • Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.

Related Skills

  • social-content: For creating social posts. Use this skill for analyzing performance.
  • campaign-analytics: For cross-channel analytics including social.
  • content-strategy: For planning social content themes.
  • marketing-context: Provides audience context for better analysis.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

28.21%
按下载量换算923

OpenCode

22.29%
按下载量换算729

Gemini CLI

18.1%
按下载量换算592

Codex

11.71%
按下载量换算383

Antigravity

7.41%
按下载量换算242

Cursor

3.41%
按下载量换算112

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills