Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计未展示

skilless.ai-writing熟练的 ai 写作

Agent Skill

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

总安装

264

周安装

11

GitHub Stars

149

下载量

88
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:skilless.ai-writing(熟练的 ai 写作)
来源仓库:https://github.com/brikerman/skilless.ai
仓库路径:skills/skilless.ai-writing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/brikerman/skilless.ai --skill skilless.ai-writing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/brikerman/skilless.ai --skill skilless.ai-writing

简介

用于辅助文档、README 和 Markdown 稿件整理。

  • 适合提炼结构、统一术语或检查链接完整性。
  • 使用时应保留项目已有事实,避免写成确定结论。
  • 安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/brikerman/skilless.ai --skill skilless.ai-writing。
  • 涉及对外文案时,需控制语气避免过度营销。

SKILL.md

Writing Skill

Produce professional, research-backed written content.

Use when user needs to: write reports, articles, emails, documentation, briefs, memos, or any content that requires research and structured presentation.

When to Use

  • User asks to "write", "draft", "compose", "create content"
  • User needs a report, analysis, or documentation
  • User wants an article, blog post, brief, or memo
  • Any writing task that benefits from research-backed data and citations

Core Principle

Every piece of writing produced by this skill must be research-first, evidence-based, and professionally structured. Do not write from general knowledge alone — always gather real data, verify claims, and cite sources.


Writing Process

Step 1 — Understand the Brief

Before writing anything, clarify:

  • What type of content? Report, article, email, documentation, memo, etc.
  • Who is the audience? Executive, technical, general public, etc.
  • What tone? Formal, conversational, technical, persuasive, etc.
  • What is the desired length? Brief (1-2 pages), standard (3-5 pages), comprehensive (5+ pages)
  • Are there specific points or questions to address?

If any of the above is unclear, use the question tool to batch-ask the user before proceeding.

Step 2 — Research (Invoke Research Skill)

Always research before writing. Invoke skilless.ai-research to gather data:

  1. Determine research depth based on the writing task:

- Quick email or short summary → L1 (1-2 searches) - Standard article or comparison → L2 (3-5 searches, 2-4 page reads) - Full report or deep analysis → L3 (5+ searches, 5+ page reads, cross-source fact-check)

  1. Let the research skill handle tool selection — it owns all CLI tools (search, web reader, video transcript extractor, media converter) and will choose the right ones based on the task.
  2. Fact-check all key claims following the research skill's fact-check protocol:

- Cross-verify key data from 2-3 independent sources - Note contradictions and resolve or flag them - Mark unverified claims explicitly

  1. Collect citation data for every fact, statistic, and claim:

- Source title, URL, publication date - Specific data points with original phrasing - Author/organization credibility

Step 3 — Outline

Before writing prose, create a structured outline:

  • Start with the conclusion / key finding
  • Organize supporting sections logically
  • Identify where each data point and citation will go
  • Ensure every major claim has a source assigned

Step 4 — Write

Follow the report structure defined below. Write clearly, concisely, and professionally.

Step 5 — Review

Before delivering:

  • Verify every citation is real and correctly referenced
  • Check that the executive summary accurately reflects the full content
  • Ensure no unsupported claims remain
  • Confirm the output follows the format rules

Report Structure

All reports and substantial writing follow this structure. Adjust section depth based on content length.

1. Executive Summary

Always lead with this. A self-contained summary that a busy reader can use without reading the full report.

Must include:

  • Key finding or recommendation — the single most important takeaway, in 1-2 sentences
  • Critical data points — the 3-5 most important numbers or facts, with citations
  • Context — why this matters, in 1-2 sentences
  • Recommended action (if applicable) — what the reader should do

Length: 150-300 words for standard reports, 50-100 words for short briefs.

2. Background / Context

  • Why this research was conducted
  • Scope and limitations
  • Key definitions or assumptions

3. Findings / Analysis

The detailed body of the report. Organize by theme, question, or comparison dimension.

Requirements:

  • Every claim backed by specific data — not vague statements like "many users prefer X", but "67% of surveyed users preferred X [3]"
  • Concrete numbers — prices, percentages, dates, version numbers, performance metrics
  • Source citations on every data point — inline [1], [2], etc.
  • Comparisons use tables when data fits single-line cells
  • Contradictions addressed explicitly — "Source A reports X [1], while Source B reports Y [2]. The discrepancy likely stems from [reason]. Source A is considered more reliable because [reason]."

4. Conclusion / Recommendations

  • Summarize findings (not a copy of the executive summary — this is more detailed)
  • Provide actionable recommendations with rationale
  • Note limitations and areas needing further investigation

5. Sources

Full citation list at the end:

## Sources

[1] [Title](URL) — Key data point used
[2] [Title](URL) — Key data point used
[3] [Title](URL) — Key data point used

Writing Standards

Data Quality

  • Use specific numbers, not vague language. Instead of "significant growth", write "42% year-over-year growth [2]"
  • Include dates and versions. Instead of "the latest version supports X", write "v3.2 (released March 2025) supports X [4]"
  • Attribute opinions. Instead of "X is considered the best", write "Gartner ranked X as the market leader in their 2025 report [5]"
  • Flag uncertainty. If data is limited, write "Based on available data (single source), X appears to be Y — further verification recommended"

Tone Matching

Adapt tone to the user's request and audience:

AudienceToneExample phrasing
Executive / decision-makerFormal, concise, action-oriented"We recommend adopting X based on 35% cost reduction [1]"
Technical teamPrecise, detailed, specification-focused"Latency reduced from 120ms to 45ms (p99) under 10K concurrent connections [3]"
General publicClear, accessible, jargon-free"This means your battery will last about twice as long as the previous model"
Internal memoDirect, brief, bullet-point heavy"Action needed: approve budget by Friday"

If the user does not specify tone, default to professional/formal for reports and analysis.

Length Calibration

  • Do not pad with filler — every sentence should carry information
  • Do not over-compress to the point of losing important nuance
  • If the user asks for a "brief" or "summary", aim for 300-500 words
  • If the user asks for a "full report" or "detailed analysis", aim for 1000-3000 words
  • When in doubt, use the question tool to ask about desired depth

Handling Different Content Types

Content typeResearch depthStructureKey focus
Full report / analysisL3Full report structure (exec summary through sources)Data depth, cross-verification, actionable recommendations
Article / blog postL2-L3Hook, body sections, conclusion, sourcesEngaging narrative, supported claims, clear takeaways
Documentation / guideL2Overview, steps/sections, examples, referencesAccuracy, completeness, practical examples
Email / memoL1-L2Key point first, supporting details, action itemsBrevity, clarity, specific asks
Comparison / evaluationL2-L3Exec summary, comparison table, detailed analysis, recommendationFair representation, concrete metrics, clear winner/tradeoffs

Asking the User

Use your environment's built-in question/ask tool when needed. Batch related questions into a single call.

SituationExample question(s)
Content type or audience unclear"To write this effectively: 1) Who is the target audience? 2) What tone — formal report or casual article? 3) Desired length?"
Scope too broad to cover well"This topic is quite broad. Would you like me to: 1) Cover all aspects at a high level 2) Focus deeply on [specific area] 3) Something else?"
Research found contradictory data"My research found conflicting data on [topic]: Source A says X, Source B says Y. How should I handle this in the report? 1) Present both with analysis 2) Go with the more credible source 3) Flag for further investigation"
Missing critical information"I could not find reliable data on [specific point]. Should I: 1) Proceed without it and note the gap 2) Try alternative search approaches 3) Adjust the scope?"
Draft complete — follow-upAfter delivering the content: "What would you like me to do next? 1) Expand a specific section 2) Adjust tone or format 3) Research additional aspects 4) Create a shorter summary version 5) Something else"

Output Format

Strict portable Markdown only. Must render correctly in any Markdown editor (GitHub, Obsidian, Typora, VS Code, etc.).

Rules

  1. No HTML tags — no <br>, <div>, <table>, <sub>, <sup>, or any HTML whatsoever
  2. Table cells must be single-line plain text — no line breaks, no nested lists, no multi-line content
  3. If content does not fit single-line table cells, use a list instead of a table
  4. Blank lines before and after headings, tables, code blocks, and block quotes
  5. Fenced code blocks only (triple backticks) — no indented code blocks
  6. No trailing spaces for line breaks — use separate paragraphs instead

Formatting Toolkit

ElementUsage
BoldKey conclusions, important numbers, recommendations
Lists (- or 1.)Pros/cons, steps, supporting points
✅ ❌ ⚠️Supported / not supported / caution
> quote blockDirect quotes from sources
` inline code `Technical terms, tool names, commands

Source Citations

Inline: [1], [2], etc. — placed immediately after the data point they support.

At the end of every document:

## Sources

[1] [Title](URL) — Key data point used
[2] [Title](URL) — Key data point used

Cross-References

  • Research & data gathering → Invoke skilless.ai-research for all search, web reading, video transcript extraction, and media operations. The research skill owns all CLI tools (search, web, youtube, ffmpeg) and defines research depth levels (L1–L3)
  • Brief unclear? → Invoke skilless.ai-brainstorming to clarify scope, audience, and direction before starting the writing process

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.46%
按下载量换算32

Claude

29.37%
按下载量换算26

Cursor

19.26%
按下载量换算17

Gemini CLI

9.49%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills