Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

swift-testingSwift 测试

Agent Skill

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

总安装

214

周安装

9

GitHub Stars

1

下载量

75
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:swift-testing(Swift 测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/shafran123/skills
仓库路径:skills/swift-testing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/shafran123/skills --skill swift-testing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/shafran123/skills --skill swift-testing

简介

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。

  • 使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。
  • 安装方式:github,安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/shafran123/skills --skill swift-testing。
  • 来源仓库:https://github.com/shafran123/skills/tree/main/skills/swift-testing。
  • 适用宿主:Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。

SKILL.md

Swift Testing (XCUITest)

This skill teaches the agent how to turn plain-English iOS UI scenarios into production-grade XCUITest code that is stable, readable, scalable, and CI-friendly.

When to use this skill

Use this skill when the user asks for any of the following:

  • Write or refactor XCUITest UI tests in Swift
  • Convert a scenario / user story into XCUITest
  • Stabilize flaky UI tests (waits, scrolling, selectors, alerts)
  • Create screen/page objects for XCUITest suites

Do not use this skill for:

  • Unit tests, integration tests, snapshot tests
  • Appium/Detox/Espresso (non-XCUITest)
  • Performance tests or Xcode Instruments workflows

Inputs to ask for (only if missing)

Ask ONLY for what’s needed to generate correct tests; do not over-question.

  1. Scenario
  • Steps the user wants to automate
  • Expected outcomes / assertions
  1. Selector availability
  • Do accessibility identifiers exist already?
  • If not, generate the list of identifiers needed
  1. App launch & environment
  • Is login required? Are there feature flags?
  • Should tests start from a deep link or home screen?
  • Any special environment setup (staging, mock server)?
  1. System dialogs
  • Are permission prompts expected (notifications, location, camera, etc.)?

If the user cannot provide identifiers, proceed anyway:

  • Generate test code using *assumed* identifiers (clearly labeled)
  • Output the “Identifiers to add” list as part of the deliverable

Output contract (STRICT)

When you generate a test, you MUST always output:

A) Test plan

  • numbered steps
  • assertions after critical steps

B) Swift XCUITest code

  • clean, compiling, copy/paste ready

C) Screen Objects

  • created or updated (with selectors centralized)

D) Accessibility identifiers required

  • exact strings and where they’re used

E) Stability notes

  • waits, scroll strategy, alert handling, anchors

F) App-side implementation code (REQUIRED)

  • Swift code to add accessibility identifiers to the app
  • Must be copy/paste ready for the ViewController
  • Include viewDidLoad() setup method
  • Include helper extensions if needed (e.g., UIView.allSubviews())

App-Side Implementation (CRITICAL)

Tests WILL FAIL if accessibility identifiers are not implemented in the app. Always generate:

1. ViewController Setup Code

override func viewDidLoad() {
    super.viewDidLoad()
    setupAccessibilityIdentifiers()
}

private func setupAccessibilityIdentifiers() {
    myLabel.accessibilityIdentifier = "screen.label"
    myButton.accessibilityIdentifier = "screen.button"
}

2. For elements without IBOutlets

private func findAndSetAccessibilityIdentifiers() {
    for subview in view.allSubviews() {
        guard let button = subview as? UIButton,
              let title = button.configuration?.title ?? button.title(for: .normal) else {
            continue
        }
        switch title {
        case "Submit":
            button.accessibilityIdentifier = "screen.button.submit"
        default:
            break
        }
    }
}

3. Required UIView Extension

extension UIView {
    func allSubviews() -> [UIView] {
        var result = subviews
        for subview in subviews {
            result.append(contentsOf: subview.allSubviews())
        }
        return result
    }
}

Pre-Flight Verification (REQUIRED)

Before tests can run successfully, verify:

StepActionValidation
1Implement accessibility identifiers in app codeCode compiles
2Build the app target⌘+B succeeds
3Run app in simulator manuallyElements visible
4Run UI tests⌘+U succeeds

Common Failure: "Element not found"

Cause: Accessibility identifiers not set in app code

Fix:

  1. Add setupAccessibilityIdentifiers() to viewDidLoad()
  2. Rebuild app (⌘+B)
  3. Re-run tests (⌘+U)

Non-negotiable engineering rules

Selector rules

  1. Prefer accessibilityIdentifier selectors:

- app.buttons["id"] - app.textFields["id"] - app.staticTexts["id"]

  1. Avoid queries by localized labels, titles, or dynamic text.
  2. Avoid XPath-like approaches (not applicable here) and brittle hierarchy traversal.
  3. If identifiers are missing, output the required list and proceed with assumed IDs.

Waiting/synchronization rules

  • Never use sleep().
  • Use explicit waits:

- waitForExistence - XCTNSPredicateExpectation for exists / hittable

  • Wait on navigation anchors (a stable element that proves the screen is loaded).

Assertions

  • Assert after each meaningful navigation:

- screen loaded anchor visible - error state visible - success state visible

  • Prefer XCTAssertTrue(anchor.exists) only after waitForVisible.

Scrolling

  • Use bounded scrolling with max swipes.
  • If not found after max swipes, fail with diagnostics.

Failure diagnostics (always)

  • Screenshot on failure (keepAlways)
  • Include meaningful failure messages (“Expected Home title to appear…”)

Project conventions the agent must follow

Naming

  • Test classes: FeatureFlowTests (e.g., LoginFlowTests)
  • Test methods: test_<action>_<expectedOutcome>()
  • Screen objects: LoginScreen, HomeScreen, SettingsScreen
  • Identifier style: screen.element (e.g., login.email, home.title)

Structure (recommended)

  • UITests/BaseUITestCase.swift
  • UITests/Helpers/*.swift
  • UITests/Screens/*.swift
  • UITests/Tests/*.swift

Required helper set

When writing any test suite, prefer reusing the helper patterns in templates/:

  • templates/BaseUITestCase.swift
  • templates/XCUIElement+Waits.swift
  • templates/XCUIApplication+Scroll.swift
  • templates/SystemAlerts.swift

What to generate (decision rules)

If user gives a scenario only

Generate:

  • screen objects required for that scenario
  • the test case using those screen objects
  • identifier list to add
  • app-side implementation code for identifiers

If user provides existing test code

Refactor into:

  • screen objects
  • helpers
  • explicit waits
  • stable selectors …and return the improved code.

If user asks to “make tests easier”

Introduce:

  • screen objects
  • small helper APIs (tapWhenHittable, typeAndDismissKeyboard, etc.) but keep it simple and conventional (no heavy DSL unless asked).

References in this skill folder

  • references/authoring-contract.md — how to interpret user input and output format
  • references/locator-strategy.md — detailed selector rules, tables, cells, dynamic content
  • references/flake-playbook.md — flake patterns and fixes
  • references/examples.md — complete end-to-end examples

Minimal example (pattern)

User scenario:

“Open app, login, verify home title.”

Agent output:

  1. Test plan steps + assertions
  2. LoginScreen, HomeScreen
  3. LoginFlowTests
  4. identifier list: login.email, login.password, login.submit, home.title

Enforcement checklist (before final answer)

  • No sleep()
  • Accessibility IDs first
  • Anchors used for screen load
  • Assertions after critical steps
  • Scrolling bounded
  • Failure diagnostics included
  • Output includes A–E sections (contract)
  • App-side identifier implementation code included
  • Pre-flight verification steps communicated to user

Dependency Verification

Before marking test generation complete:

CheckRequiredHow to Verify
Test files createdFiles exist in UITests folder
Screen objects createdFiles exist in Screens folder
App-side identifiers implementedViewController updated
App builds successfully⌘+B passes

Failure Prevention

Root Cause of Most Failures: Gap between "identifiers listed" and "identifiers implemented"

Prevention:

  1. Always generate app-side implementation code (Section F)
  2. Always update the ViewController file directly
  3. Always verify app builds before claiming tests are ready

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

27.5%
按下载量换算21

OpenCode

24.35%
按下载量换算18

Antigravity

19.89%
按下载量换算15

Gemini CLI

12.21%
按下载量换算9

Cursor

8.37%
按下载量换算6

windsurf

3.37%
按下载量换算3

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills