Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
前端设计需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

separation-of-concerns关注点分离

Agent Skill

用于辅助前端页面、组件、样式和交互逻辑的开发与维护。它适合让 Agent 生成或审查 React、Next.js、Vue、Tailwind、CSS 等相关代码,整理组件结构,或定位布局和性能问题。使用时需要结合项目现有设计系统、路由和构建方式,避免只生成孤立片段;涉及页面改动时,应配合本地预览和构建检查确认视觉效果。

总安装

1,038

周安装

42

GitHub Stars

10

下载量

326
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:separation-of-concerns(关注点分离)
来源仓库:https://github.com/yanko-belov/code-craft
仓库路径:skills/separation-of-concerns
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/yanko-belov/code-craft --skill separation-of-concerns
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/yanko-belov/code-craft --skill separation-of-concerns

简介

用于辅助前端页面、组件、样式和交互逻辑的开发与维护。

  • 适合生成或审查 React、Next.js、Vue、Tailwind、CSS 等相关代码。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。
  • 建议确认权限范围和维护状态,涉及页面改动时应配合本地预览和构建检查。
  • separation-of-concerns 属于前端设计类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Separation of Concerns

Overview

Each piece of code should do one thing. Data, logic, and presentation should be separate.

Mixed concerns create untestable, unreusable, unmaintainable code. Separation enables testing, reuse, and clarity.

When to Use

  • Component fetches, transforms, and displays data
  • Business logic mixed with UI code
  • Database queries in controllers
  • Hard to test a piece of code in isolation

The Iron Rule

NEVER mix data fetching, business logic, and presentation in one place.

No exceptions:

  • Not for "it's a small component"
  • Not for "it's simpler this way"
  • Not for "only used once"
  • Not for "it works"

Detection: Mixed Concerns Smell

If one file does fetch + transform + display, STOP:

// ❌ VIOLATION: Component does everything
function UserProfile({ userId }) {
  const [user, setUser] = useState(null);
  const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true);

  useEffect(() => {
    // Data fetching
    fetch(`/api/users/${userId}`)
      .then(res => res.json())
      .then(data => {
        // Business logic / transformation
        const fullName = `${data.firstName} ${data.lastName}`;
        const memberSince = new Date(data.createdAt).toLocaleDateString();
        const isVIP = data.orderCount > 100;

        setUser({ ...data, fullName, memberSince, isVIP });
        setLoading(false);
      });
  }, [userId]);

  // Presentation
  if (loading) return <div>Loading...</div>;

  return (
    <div className="user-profile">
      <h1>{user.fullName}</h1>
      {user.isVIP && <span className="vip-badge">VIP</span>}
      <p>Member since: {user.memberSince}</p>
    </div>
  );
}

Problems:

  • Can't test formatting without fetching
  • Can't reuse fetch logic
  • Can't reuse presentation
  • Component does 3 jobs

The Correct Pattern: Separated Layers

// ✅ CORRECT: Separated concerns

// 1. Data fetching (hook)
// hooks/useUser.ts
function useUser(userId: string) {
  const [user, setUser] = useState<User | null>(null);
  const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true);
  const [error, setError] = useState<Error | null>(null);

  useEffect(() => {
    setLoading(true);
    fetch(`/api/users/${userId}`)
      .then(res => {
        if (!res.ok) throw new Error('Failed to fetch');
        return res.json();
      })
      .then(setUser)
      .catch(setError)
      .finally(() => setLoading(false));
  }, [userId]);

  return { user, loading, error };
}

// 2. Business logic (pure functions)
// utils/userFormatters.ts
interface FormattedUser {
  fullName: string;
  memberSince: string;
  isVIP: boolean;
}

function formatUser(user: User): FormattedUser {
  return {
    fullName: `${user.firstName} ${user.lastName}`,
    memberSince: new Date(user.createdAt).toLocaleDateString(),
    isVIP: user.orderCount > 100,
  };
}

// 3. Presentation (dumb component)
// components/UserCard.tsx
interface UserCardProps {
  fullName: string;
  memberSince: string;
  isVIP: boolean;
}

function UserCard({ fullName, memberSince, isVIP }: UserCardProps) {
  return (
    <div className="user-profile">
      <h1>{fullName}</h1>
      {isVIP && <span className="vip-badge">VIP</span>}
      <p>Member since: {memberSince}</p>
    </div>
  );
}

// 4. Composition (container component)
// pages/UserProfile.tsx
function UserProfile({ userId }) {
  const { user, loading, error } = useUser(userId);

  if (loading) return <LoadingSpinner />;
  if (error) return <ErrorMessage error={error} />;
  if (!user) return <NotFound />;

  const formatted = formatUser(user);

  return <UserCard {...formatted} />;
}

Benefits of Separation

MixedSeparated
Can't test formattingformatUser() tested in isolation
Can't reuse fetchuseUser() reusable anywhere
Can't reuse UIUserCard reusable with any data
1 complex component4 simple pieces

The Layers

1. Data Layer (Hooks, Services)

  • Fetching data
  • API calls
  • State management
  • No business logic

2. Logic Layer (Pure Functions)

  • Transformations
  • Calculations
  • Validations
  • Business rules

3. Presentation Layer (Components)

  • Rendering UI
  • Styling
  • User interactions
  • No data fetching

4. Composition Layer (Containers)

  • Connects layers
  • Handles loading/error states
  • Passes data down

Pressure Resistance Protocol

1. "It's a Small Component"

Pressure: "For simple cases, separation is overkill"

Response: Small becomes large. Start clean, stay clean.

Action: Separate even for small components. It costs little.

2. "It's Simpler This Way"

Pressure: "Everything in one place is easier to understand"

Response: Mixed concerns seem simple but are hard to test, debug, and modify.

Action: Separation is simpler in the long run.

3. "Only Used Once"

Pressure: "This component is unique, won't be reused"

Response: Testability matters even for unique components.

Action: Separate for testability, not just reuse.

Red Flags - STOP and Reconsider

  • useEffect with fetch + transform + setState
  • Business logic in render functions
  • Database queries in route handlers
  • API calls in utility functions
  • Components with 100+ lines

All of these mean: Separate the concerns.

Quick Reference

ConcernWhere It Belongs
API callsHooks / Services
Data transformationPure functions
Business rulesPure functions
UI renderingPresentation components
Connecting piecesContainer components

Common Rationalizations (All Invalid)

ExcuseReality
"Small component"Small grows. Separate now.
"Simpler together"Separated is simpler to test/modify.
"Only used once"Testability matters.
"It works"Working ≠ maintainable.
"Over-engineering"This is just engineering.

The Bottom Line

Data fetching in hooks. Logic in pure functions. UI in components.

Separation enables testing, reuse, and maintainability. A component should either fetch data, transform it, or display it - never all three.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

27.66%
按下载量换算90

Claude Code

22.26%
按下载量换算73

Antigravity

17.05%
按下载量换算56

windsurf

11.34%
按下载量换算37

github-copilot

7.1%
按下载量换算23

Gemini CLI

3.35%
按下载量换算11

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills