Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索external-servicegithub未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

seo-sxoSEO SXO 搜索

Agent Skill

seo-sxo 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

7,722

周安装

325

GitHub Stars

5,717

下载量

2,704
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:seo-sxo(SEO SXO 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/agricidaniel/claude-seo
仓库路径:skills/seo-sxo
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/agricidaniel/claude-seo --skill seo-sxo
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/agricidaniel/claude-seo --skill seo-sxo

简介

用于查找和筛选与 SEO SXO(Search eXperience Optimization)相关的信息。

  • 适合在用户体验与搜索表现协同优化等任务中使用。
  • 通过 npx 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装并调用。
  • 安装前建议核实权限、维护状态及是否涉及联网或文件操作。
  • seo-sxo 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Search Experience Optimization (SXO)

SXO bridges the gap between SEO (what Google rewards) and UX (what users need). Traditional SEO audits check technical health. SXO asks: "Does this page deserve to rank for this keyword based on what Google is actually rewarding in the SERP?"

Core Insight

A page can score 95/100 on technical SEO and still fail to rank because it is the wrong page type for the keyword. If Google shows 8 product pages and 2 comparison pages for your keyword, your blog post will never break through -- no matter how well-optimized it is.

Commands

CommandPurpose
/seo sxo <url>Full SXO analysis (auto-detect keyword from page)
/seo sxo <url> <keyword>Full SXO analysis for a specific keyword
/seo sxo wireframe <url>Generate IST/SOLL wireframe with concrete placeholders
/seo sxo personas <url>Persona-only scoring (skip SERP analysis)

Execution Pipeline

Step 1: Target Acquisition

  1. Fetch the target URL via scripts/fetch_page.py (SSRF-safe)
  2. Parse with scripts/parse_html.py to extract: title, H1, meta description, headings hierarchy, word count, schema markup, CTAs, media elements
  3. If no keyword provided, extract primary keyword from title tag + H1 overlap
  4. Validate keyword is non-empty before proceeding

Step 2: SERP Backwards Analysis

Read references/page-type-taxonomy.md for classification rules.

  1. Search Google for the target keyword (WebSearch)
  2. For each of the top 10 organic results, record:

- URL and domain authority tier (brand / niche authority / unknown) - Page type (classify using taxonomy) - Content format (long-form, listicle, how-to, comparison, tool, video) - Word count estimate (from snippet length and page structure) - Schema types present (from SERP features: ratings, FAQ, HowTo) - Media signals (video carousel, image pack, thumbnail presence)

  1. Record SERP features present:

- Featured snippet (paragraph / list / table / video) - People Also Ask (extract all visible questions) - Ads (top and bottom -- count and analyze ad copy themes) - Related searches (extract all) - Knowledge panel / local pack / shopping results - AI Overview presence and source types

  1. Calculate SERP consensus:

- Dominant page type (>60% = strong consensus, 40-60% = mixed, <40% = fragmented) - Content depth expectations (average word count tier) - Schema expectation (most common structured data types) - Media expectations (video required? images critical?)

Step 3: Page-Type Mismatch Detection

This is the core SXO insight. Compare target page type against SERP consensus.

Mismatch severity levels:

Target TypeSERP ExpectsSeverityRecommendation
Blog PostProduct PagesCRITICALCreate dedicated product page
Blog PostComparisonHIGHRestructure as comparison with matrix
ProductInformationalHIGHAdd educational content layer
Landing PageTool/CalculatorHIGHBuild interactive tool component
Service PageLocal ResultsMEDIUMAdd location signals + local schema
Any type match-ALIGNEDFocus on content depth and UX

Classification rules:

  • Classify target page using references/page-type-taxonomy.md
  • Classify each SERP result using the same taxonomy
  • Flag mismatch if target type differs from SERP dominant type
  • If SERP is fragmented (no dominant type), note opportunity for differentiation

Step 4: User Story Derivation

Read references/user-story-framework.md for the full framework.

From SERP signals, derive user stories:

  1. PAA questions reveal knowledge gaps and concerns
  2. Ad copy themes reveal commercial triggers and value propositions
  3. Related searches reveal the search journey (what comes before/after)
  4. Featured snippet format reveals the expected answer structure
  5. AI Overview reveals what Google considers the definitive answer

For each signal cluster, generate a user story:

As a [persona derived from signal],
I want to [goal derived from query intent],
because [emotional driver from ad copy / PAA tone],
but I'm blocked by [barrier derived from PAA questions / related searches].

Generate 3-5 user stories covering the primary intent angles.

Step 5: Gap Analysis

Compare the target page against SERP expectations across 7 dimensions:

DimensionWhat to CompareScore
Page TypeTarget type vs SERP dominant type0-15
Content DepthWord count, heading depth, topic coverage0-15
UX SignalsCTA clarity, above-fold content, mobile layout0-15
Schema MarkupPresent vs expected structured data types0-15
Media RichnessImages, video, interactive elements vs SERP norm0-15
Authority SignalsE-E-A-T markers, social proof, credentials0-15
FreshnessLast updated, date signals, content recency0-10

Total: 0-100 SXO Gap Score (lower = larger gap, higher = better alignment)

Step 6: Persona-Based Scoring

Read references/persona-scoring.md for methodology.

  1. Derive 4-7 personas from SERP intent signals:

- Cluster PAA questions by theme - Segment ad copy by target audience - Map related searches to journey stages

  1. For each persona, score the target page on 4 dimensions (25 pts each):

- Relevance: Does the page address this persona's need? - Clarity: Can this persona find their answer within 10 seconds? - Trust: Are there adequate trust signals for this persona? - Action: Is there a clear next step for this persona?

  1. Output persona cards with scores and specific improvement recommendations
  2. Sort recommendations by weakest persona first (biggest opportunity)

Step 7: Wireframe Generation (Optional)

Only execute when /seo sxo wireframe is invoked.

Read references/wireframe-templates.md for templates.

  1. Generate IST (current state) wireframe from parsed page structure
  2. Generate SOLL (target state) wireframe based on:

- SERP consensus page type - Gap analysis findings - Persona scoring weaknesses

  1. Use ultra-concrete placeholders:

- NOT: "Add a CTA here" - YES: "Add pricing CTA with annual savings badge below hero, linking to /pricing#enterprise"

  1. Output as semantic HTML section outline with annotations

DataForSEO Integration

If DataForSEO MCP tools are available:

  1. Before any API call, run cost estimate and confirm with user
  2. Use google_organic_serp for precise SERP data (positions, features, snippets)
  3. Use keyword_data for search volume and competition metrics
  4. Fall back to WebSearch if DataForSEO unavailable -- note reduced precision in output

SXO Score vs SEO Health Score

The SXO score is separate from the main SEO Health Score.

  • SEO Health Score = technical compliance (crawlability, speed, schema, etc.)
  • SXO Gap Score = alignment between page and SERP expectations
  • A page can score 95 SEO + 30 SXO = technically perfect but strategically misaligned
  • Both scores should be reported together when both are available

Cross-Skill References

FindingHand Off To
E-E-A-T gaps in persona scoring/seo content for deep E-E-A-T audit
Missing schema types/seo schema for generation
Local intent detected in SERP/seo local for GBP analysis
Content depth gaps/seo page for deep page analysis
Technical issues found during fetch/seo technical for full audit
Image/media gaps/seo images for optimization

Output Format

Full SXO Analysis

## SXO Analysis: [URL]
### Target Keyword: [keyword]

### 1. SERP Landscape
- Dominant page type: [type] ([confidence]% consensus)
- SERP features: [list]
- Content depth norm: [word count range]
- Schema expectation: [types]

### 2. Page-Type Alignment
- Your page type: [type]
- SERP expects: [type]
- Verdict: [ALIGNED | MISMATCH (severity)]
- Impact: [explanation]

### 3. User Stories (derived from SERP signals)
[3-5 user stories with source signals]

### 4. Gap Analysis (SXO Score: XX/100)
[7-dimension breakdown table]

### 5. Persona Scores
[4-7 persona cards with 4-dimension scores]

### 6. Priority Actions
[Ranked list: fix mismatch first, then weakest persona gaps]

### 7. Limitations
[What could not be assessed, data source notes]

Error Handling

ErrorAction
URL fetch failsReport error, suggest checking URL accessibility
No keyword provided or detectedAsk user to provide target keyword
WebSearch returns <5 resultsProceed with available data, note limited sample
SERP has no organic results (all ads)Note highly commercial SERP, analyze ad copy only
Target page is JavaScript-renderedNote limitation, use available HTML content
DataForSEO cost exceeds thresholdFall back to WebSearch, notify user

Quality Checklist

Before delivering results, verify:

  • Target URL was fetched via scripts/fetch_page.py (not raw curl/fetch)
  • Page type classification uses taxonomy from references
  • At least 5 SERP results were analyzed
  • User stories cite specific SERP signals as evidence
  • Persona scores include concrete improvement suggestions
  • SXO score is clearly labeled as separate from SEO Health Score
  • Limitations section is present and honest
  • Cross-skill recommendations are included where relevant

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36%
按下载量换算973

Claude

30.5%
按下载量换算825

Cursor

19.42%
按下载量换算525

Gemini CLI

9.72%
按下载量换算263

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills