Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

seo-content-auditSEO 内容审核

Agent Skill

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

总安装

824

周安装

33

GitHub Stars

10

下载量

267
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:seo-content-audit(SEO 内容审核)
来源仓库:https://github.com/schwepps/skills
仓库路径:skills/seo-content-audit
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/schwepps/skills --skill seo-content-audit
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/schwepps/skills --skill seo-content-audit

简介

用于辅助文档、README 和内容稿件的整理与改写。

  • 适合提炼结构、统一术语或检查链接完整性。
  • 使用时应保留项目已有事实,避免写成确定结论。
  • 安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/schwepps/skills --skill seo-content-audit
  • 涉及对外文案时需控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

SKILL.md

SEO Content Audit Framework

Professional methodology for comprehensive on-page SEO and content quality analysis.

When to Use This Skill

  • Auditing existing content for SEO performance
  • Reviewing new content before publication
  • Identifying optimization opportunities
  • Evaluating E-E-A-T signals
  • Scoring content quality
  • Competitive content analysis
  • Creating content improvement plans

Audit Workflow

Phase 1: On-Page SEO Elements

Title Tag Analysis:

□ Length: 50-60 characters
□ Primary keyword near beginning (first 30 chars)
□ Unique across site
□ Compelling for CTR
□ Brand included (if space)
□ No keyword stuffing
□ Matches search intent

Meta Description Analysis:

□ Length: 150-160 characters
□ Contains primary keyword
□ Includes call-to-action
□ Unique across site
□ Accurately describes content
□ Compelling for clicks

Header Structure (H1-H6):

Requirements:
□ Single H1 matching topic
□ H1 contains primary keyword
□ Logical hierarchy (H1 → H2 → H3)
□ No skipped levels
□ Keywords in H2s naturally
□ Descriptive, not generic

URL Structure:

□ Clean, descriptive
□ Contains primary keyword
□ Under 60 characters
□ Lowercase with hyphens
□ No parameters or IDs
□ Matches content hierarchy

Phase 2: Content Quality Assessment

Content Completeness Scoring:

FactorCheckScore
Topic coverageComprehensive vs. shallow/10
Unique valueOriginal insights vs. rehash/10
AccuracyFactual, verifiable/10
FreshnessCurrent information/10
DepthExpert-level detail/10

The C.R.E.A.T.E. Framework:

FactorQuestionScore 1-4
ComprehensivenessDoes it fully answer the query?
RelevanceDoes it match search intent?
ExpertiseDoes it demonstrate deep knowledge?
ActionabilityCan readers apply this immediately?
TrustworthinessAre claims supported by evidence?
EngagementIs it interesting to read?

Readability Standards:

Target reading level: Grade 8-10 (Flesch-Kincaid)
Paragraph length: 2-4 sentences ideal
Sentence variety: Mix short and medium
Scannable formatting: Headers, bullets, bold
Visual aids: Images, tables, diagrams where helpful

Phase 3: Keyword Optimization

Primary Keyword Checklist:

□ In title tag (first 30 chars)
□ In H1
□ In first 100 words
□ In at least one H2
□ In meta description
□ In URL
□ Natural density: 0.5-1.5%
□ In image alt text (if relevant)

Semantic Coverage:

□ LSI keywords present
□ Related entities mentioned
□ Question variations addressed
□ Synonyms used naturally
□ Topic cluster alignment
□ Search intent fully matched

Keyword Density Guidelines:

Primary keyword: 0.5-1.5% density (natural)
Secondary keywords: 0.3-0.8% each
LSI/Related terms: Natural inclusion
Avoid: Keyword stuffing (>2%)

Phase 4: E-E-A-T Evaluation

Experience Signals:

□ First-hand experience indicated
□ Case studies/examples included
□ Original data or research
□ Process documentation
□ Real-world applications shown
□ Personal insights shared

Expertise Signals:

□ Author credentials visible
□ Author bio with qualifications
□ Technical accuracy verified
□ Comprehensive coverage
□ Expert quotes/interviews
□ Specialized terminology used correctly

Authority Signals:

□ Authoritative external citations
□ Links to primary sources
□ Industry recognition mentioned
□ Published research referenced
□ Brand authority established
□ Backlink profile (if available)

Trust Signals:

□ Contact information accessible
□ Privacy policy linked
□ Editorial guidelines visible
□ Sources cited inline
□ Last updated date shown
□ Author photo and bio
□ Secure site (HTTPS)

Phase 5: Internal Linking

Best Practices:
□ 3-10 internal links per 1000 words
□ Descriptive anchor text (not "click here")
□ Links to related content
□ Links from high-authority pages
□ Logical link hierarchy
□ No orphan pages
□ Breadcrumb navigation

Phase 6: Performance Signals

Metrics to Evaluate (if available):

□ Organic traffic trend
□ Average position for target keywords
□ Click-through rate (CTR)
□ Bounce rate
□ Time on page
□ Pages per session
□ Conversion rate

Benchmarks:

MetricPoorAverageGood
CTR (pos 1-3)<3%3-8%>8%
Bounce rate>70%50-70%<50%
Time on page<1min1-3min>3min

Output Format

# SEO Content Audit Report

**Page:** [URL or filename]
**Date:** [Date]
**Overall Score:** X/100

## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentence overview of findings]

## Scores by Category

| Category | Score | Status |
|----------|-------|--------|
| On-Page SEO | X/20 | [Good/Needs Work/Critical] |
| Content Quality | X/25 | [Good/Needs Work/Critical] |
| Keyword Optimization | X/15 | [Good/Needs Work/Critical] |
| E-E-A-T Signals | X/20 | [Good/Needs Work/Critical] |
| AI/GEO Readiness | X/20 | [Good/Needs Work/Critical] |

## Priority Issues (Fix First)
1. **[Issue]** - [Impact] - [Fix]
2. **[Issue]** - [Impact] - [Fix]
3. **[Issue]** - [Impact] - [Fix]

## On-Page SEO Findings
- Title: [Current] → [Recommended]
- Meta: [Current] → [Recommended]
- Headers: [Analysis]
- URL: [Analysis]

## Content Quality Findings
- C.R.E.A.T.E. Score: X/24
- Word count: [X] (Recommended: [Y])
- Readability: Grade [X]
- Gaps: [List]

## Keyword Analysis
- Primary: [Keyword] - Density: X%
- Missing opportunities: [List]
- Over-optimized: [List if any]

## E-E-A-T Assessment
- Strengths: [List]
- Gaps: [List]
- Recommendations: [List]

## Action Plan

**Immediate (This Week):**
- [ ] Action 1
- [ ] Action 2

**Short-term (This Month):**
- [ ] Action 1
- [ ] Action 2

**Ongoing:**
- [ ] Action 1
- [ ] Action 2

Quick Audit (5-Point Check)

  1. Title & Meta - Optimized, compelling, <60 chars?
  2. H1 & Structure - Clear hierarchy, keyword in H1?
  3. Content Depth - Comprehensive, >1500 words for guides?
  4. E-E-A-T - Author credentials, trust signals visible?
  5. AI Ready - TL;DR present, extractable format?

Scoring Guide

  • 90-100: Excellent - Minor optimizations only
  • 70-89: Good - Some improvements needed
  • 50-69: Needs Work - Significant gaps to address
  • Below 50: Critical - Major overhaul required

Scoring Rubric (Detailed)

On-Page SEO (20 points):

  • Title tag optimized: 5 pts
  • Meta description optimized: 4 pts
  • Header structure correct: 4 pts
  • URL optimized: 3 pts
  • Image alt text: 2 pts
  • Internal links: 2 pts

Content Quality (25 points):

  • Comprehensiveness: 5 pts
  • Accuracy: 5 pts
  • Originality: 5 pts
  • Readability: 5 pts
  • Engagement: 5 pts

Keyword Optimization (15 points):

  • Primary keyword placement: 6 pts
  • Semantic coverage: 5 pts
  • Natural density: 4 pts

E-E-A-T (20 points):

  • Experience signals: 5 pts
  • Expertise signals: 5 pts
  • Authority signals: 5 pts
  • Trust signals: 5 pts

AI/GEO Readiness (20 points):

  • TL;DR/Summary: 4 pts
  • Extractable structure: 4 pts
  • FAQ section: 4 pts
  • Schema markup: 4 pts
  • Fact density: 4 pts

Competitor Analysis Framework

When comparing against competitors:

  1. Identify top 3-5 ranking competitors for target keyword
  2. Analyze their content:

- Word count - Header structure - Topics covered - Unique angles - E-E-A-T signals

  1. Find gaps:

- Topics they miss - Questions unanswered - Data not included

  1. Create differentiation plan:

- Original research - Better visuals - More comprehensive coverage - Stronger E-E-A-T

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

28.88%
按下载量换算77

OpenCode

23.37%
按下载量换算62

Gemini CLI

18.05%
按下载量换算48

Antigravity

12.36%
按下载量换算33

windsurf

7.3%
按下载量换算19

github-copilot

3.06%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills