Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

self-evo-agent自我进化 Agent

Agent Skill

self-evo-agent 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 OpenClaw 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

7,614

周安装

308

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

2,390
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:self-evo-agent(自我进化 Agent)
来源仓库:https://github.com/rangeking/self-evo-agent
安装命令:
openclaw skills install self-evo-agent
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install self-evo-agent

简介

为目标驱动的自主学习循环构建自学习框架,支持能力升级与技能迭代。

  • 适用于代理长期演进、工作流优化及跨任务知识迁移场景。
  • 集成诊断、实验设计与效果评估模块,形成完整进化链路。
  • 修改自身配置前应保留快照,便于异常时回滚与审计追踪。
  • self-evo-agent 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

name
self-evolving-agent
description
Build a goal-driven self-learning loop for OpenClaw and coding agents. Use when the agent should not only log mistakes, but diagnose capability gaps, maintain a capability map and learning agenda, generate training units, evaluate progress, validate transfer, and promote only proven strategies into long-term behavior. Also use before major tasks to retrieve relevant learnings, inspect capability risks, and choose safer execution strategies.
metadata
short-description
Capability evolution for agents

Self-Evolving Agent

self-evolving-agent upgrades passive self-improvement into an explicit capability evolution system.

Use this skill when any of the following is true:

  • A task is difficult, novel, high-stakes, or long-horizon.
  • An error, correction, or near-miss reveals a deeper capability weakness.
  • The same failure pattern appears more than once.
  • A useful tactic might deserve promotion into long-term context, but has not been validated yet.
  • You want to understand not just what went wrong, but what the agent can do now, what it still cannot do, and what it should train next.

Default to the light loop first. Escalate into the full capability-evolution loop only when the task or evidence justifies the extra cost.

Core Principle

Do not treat logging as learning.

This skill separates six states of progress:

  1. recorded
  2. understood
  3. practiced
  4. passed
  5. generalized
  6. promoted

A lesson only becomes long-term policy after it survives training and transfer.

What This Skill Preserves From Classic Self-Improvement

Keep the original strengths as the memory layer:

  • Log errors, corrections, learnings, and feature requests.
  • Detect recurring patterns.
  • Review prior learnings before major work.
  • Promote only high-value guidance into long-term context.
  • Use workspace files and hooks to keep memory persistent across sessions.

What This Skill Adds

This skill adds an active learning layer:

  • Capability map with levels, failure modes, and upgrade criteria
  • Proactive learning agenda that selects the next 1-3 capabilities to train
  • Task-level diagnosis of root causes
  • Training unit generation for recurring weaknesses
  • Evaluation gates that separate recording from mastery
  • Transfer checks on new tasks before promotion
  • Reflection routines that force self-explanation and counterexamples

Closed Loop

Run the following loop, in order:

  1. Classify the task.
  2. Retrieve relevant learnings and related capabilities.
  3. Run a pre-task risk diagnosis.
  4. Choose an execution strategy.
  5. Perform the task.
  6. Run post-task reflection.
  7. Update the capability map.
  8. Generate a training unit if weakness or recurrence is detected.
  9. Evaluate learning progress.
  10. Promote only validated strategies.

Effort Modes

Light loop

Use the lightweight pass when all of the following are true:

  • The task is familiar.
  • Consequence is low.
  • Horizon is short.
  • No active agenda focus is central to the task.
  • No failure, near-miss, or user rescue exposed a deeper weakness.
  • No learning needs training, evaluation, or promotion.

In the light loop:

  1. Retrieve only the most relevant 1-3 memory items.
  2. Name the single most likely risk and one verification check.
  3. Do the work.
  4. Log only unusually reusable lessons.
  5. Stop unless an escalation trigger fires.

Full loop

Run the full loop when any of the following is true:

  • The task is mixed or unfamiliar.
  • Consequence is medium or high and failure would matter.
  • Horizon is medium or long with many dependencies.
  • An active agenda focus is relevant.
  • A failure, near-miss, or user correction suggests a reusable weakness.
  • A similar issue repeated, transfer failed, or promotion is under consideration.
  • The task itself is deliberate practice, evaluation, or promotion review.

Escalation triggers

Escalate from light to full when any of the following appears during execution:

  • non-trivial rework
  • verification catches a real defect
  • the user had to rescue or redirect the task
  • a missed retrieval or repeated pattern appears
  • the learning looks broad enough to affect future policy

Control Loop

Outside the 10-step task loop, maintain an explicit learning agenda.

Run an agenda review when any of the following is true:

  • The workspace is new and no calibrated capability map exists.
  • Five meaningful cycles have passed since the last review.
  • A structural_gap or failed transfer was detected.
  • A long-horizon or unfamiliar task is about to begin.

During agenda review:

  • choose the top 1-3 capabilities to train next
  • defer lower-leverage weaknesses instead of training everything at once
  • define what evidence would retire or advance each focus
  • link each focus to existing or new training units

File Map

  • Main orchestration: system/coordinator.md
  • Learning agenda and review cycle: modules/learning-agenda.md
  • Diagnosis: modules/diagnose.md
  • Capability definitions and update rules: modules/capability-map.md
  • Training unit design: modules/curriculum.md
  • Learning evaluation ladder: modules/evaluator.md
  • Promotion gate: modules/promotion.md
  • Reflection protocol: modules/reflection.md

Assets and ledgers:

  • assets/LEARNINGS.md
  • assets/ERRORS.md
  • assets/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md
  • assets/CAPABILITIES.md
  • assets/LEARNING_AGENDA.md
  • assets/TRAINING_UNITS.md
  • assets/EVALUATIONS.md

Operating Rules

During migration from self-improving-agent

  • Treat .evolution/legacy-self-improving/ as a read-only memory layer.
  • Search the legacy files during retrieval if they exist.
  • Do not bulk-convert every old entry into the new schema on day one.
  • Normalize a legacy learning into .evolution only when it is reused, agenda-worthy, or needed for evaluation.

Before a substantial task

  • Read system/coordinator.md.
  • Check whether assets/LEARNING_AGENDA.md requires a review cycle.
  • Retrieve relevant entries from LEARNINGS, ERRORS, CAPABILITIES, and TRAINING_UNITS.
  • Identify the top 1-3 risk capabilities for this task.

After every meaningful task

  • Log incident-level observations in the memory files.
  • Diagnose the weakest capability involved.
  • Update the capability map with evidence, not vibes.
  • Refresh the learning agenda if a focus should change.
  • If the issue is recurring or high-leverage, create or revise a training unit.
  • Record evaluation status using the six-state ladder.

Before promotion

  • Read modules/evaluator.md and modules/promotion.md.
  • Confirm the strategy has passed training and succeeded in at least one transfer scenario.
  • Promote the smallest stable rule that explains the success.

When Not To Use Heavyweight Evaluation

Use a lightweight pass when all of the following are true:

  • The task was trivial.
  • No real uncertainty or failure occurred.
  • No new behavior should be generalized.

In that case, log the learning only if it is unusually reusable.

Output Contracts

When this skill is active, prefer producing these artifacts:

  • A learning agenda review when triggers fire
  • A short pre-task risk diagnosis
  • A post-task capability diagnosis
  • A TRAINING_UNIT when recurrence or weakness appears
  • An EVALUATION entry when progress is tested
  • A promotion decision with explicit evidence

Recommended Workflow

  1. Read system/coordinator.md.
  2. Load only the modules needed for the current step.
  3. Use the asset templates as the canonical output format.
  4. Keep long-term memory strict: only promote validated patterns.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

71.53%
按下载量换算1,710

安全审计

VirusTotal

可疑

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills