Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据github未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

security-testing安全测试

Agent Skill

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

总安装

2,184

周安装

91

GitHub Stars

331

下载量

728
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:security-testing(安全测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
仓库路径:skills/security-testing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill security-testing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill security-testing

简介

用于自动化安全测试用例生成和执行。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

  • 适合模拟常见攻击向量进行防御验证。
  • 可检查输入验证和输出编码实现质量。
  • 安装需通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库获取。
  • 适用于持续集成中的安全门禁测试。security-testing 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Security Testing

<default_to_action> When testing security or conducting audits:

  1. TEST OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities systematically
  2. VALIDATE authentication and authorization on every endpoint
  3. SCAN dependencies for known vulnerabilities (npm audit)
  4. CHECK for injection attacks (SQL, XSS, command)
  5. VERIFY secrets aren't exposed in code/logs

Quick Security Checks:

  • Access control → Test horizontal/vertical privilege escalation
  • Crypto → Verify password hashing, HTTPS, no sensitive data exposed
  • Injection → Test SQL injection, XSS, command injection
  • Auth → Test weak passwords, session fixation, MFA enforcement
  • Config → Check error messages don't leak info

Critical Success Factors:

  • Think like an attacker, build like a defender
  • Security is built in, not added at the end
  • Test continuously in CI/CD, not just before release </default_to_action>

Quick Reference Card

When to Use

  • Security audits and penetration testing
  • Testing authentication/authorization
  • Validating input sanitization
  • Reviewing security configuration

OWASP Top 10 (2021)

#VulnerabilityKey Test
1Broken Access ControlUser A accessing User B's data
2Cryptographic FailuresPlaintext passwords, HTTP
3InjectionSQL/XSS/command injection
4Insecure DesignRate limiting, session timeout
5Security MisconfigurationVerbose errors, exposed /admin
6Vulnerable Componentsnpm audit, outdated packages
7Auth FailuresWeak passwords, no MFA
8Integrity FailuresUnsigned updates, malware
9Logging FailuresNo audit trail for breaches
10SSRFServer fetching internal URLs

Tools

TypeToolPurpose
SASTSonarQube, SemgrepStatic code analysis
DASTOWASP ZAP, BurpDynamic scanning
Depsnpm audit, SnykDependency vulnerabilities
Secretsgit-secrets, TruffleHogSecret scanning

Agent Coordination

  • qe-security-scanner: Multi-layer SAST/DAST scanning
  • qe-api-contract-validator: API security testing
  • qe-quality-analyzer: Security code review

Key Vulnerability Tests

1. Broken Access Control

// Horizontal escalation - User A accessing User B's data
test('user cannot access another user\'s order', async () => {
  const userAToken = await login('userA');
  const userBOrder = await createOrder('userB');

  const response = await api.get(`/orders/${userBOrder.id}`, {
    headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${userAToken}` }
  });
  expect(response.status).toBe(403);
});

// Vertical escalation - Regular user accessing admin
test('regular user cannot access admin', async () => {
  const userToken = await login('regularUser');
  expect((await api.get('/admin/users', {
    headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${userToken}` }
  })).status).toBe(403);
});

2. Injection Attacks

// SQL Injection
test('prevents SQL injection', async () => {
  const malicious = "' OR '1'='1";
  const response = await api.get(`/products?search=${malicious}`);
  expect(response.body.length).toBeLessThan(100); // Not all products
});

// XSS
test('sanitizes HTML output', async () => {
  const xss = '<script>alert("XSS")</script>';
  await api.post('/comments', { text: xss });

  const html = (await api.get('/comments')).body;
  expect(html).toContain('<script>');
  expect(html).not.toContain('<script>');
});

3. Cryptographic Failures

test('passwords are hashed', async () => {
  await db.users.create({ email: 'test@example.com', password: 'MyPassword123' });
  const user = await db.users.findByEmail('test@example.com');

  expect(user.password).not.toBe('MyPassword123');
  expect(user.password).toMatch(/^\$2[aby]\$\d{2}\$/); // bcrypt
});

test('no sensitive data in API response', async () => {
  const response = await api.get('/users/me');
  expect(response.body).not.toHaveProperty('password');
  expect(response.body).not.toHaveProperty('ssn');
});

4. Security Misconfiguration

test('errors don\'t leak sensitive info', async () => {
  const response = await api.post('/login', { email: 'nonexistent@test.com', password: 'wrong' });
  expect(response.body.error).toBe('Invalid credentials'); // Generic message
});

test('sensitive endpoints not exposed', async () => {
  const endpoints = ['/debug', '/.env', '/.git', '/admin'];
  for (let ep of endpoints) {
    expect((await fetch(`https://example.com${ep}`)).status).not.toBe(200);
  }
});

5. Rate Limiting

test('rate limiting prevents brute force', async () => {
  const responses = [];
  for (let i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
    responses.push(await api.post('/login', { email: 'test@example.com', password: 'wrong' }));
  }
  expect(responses.filter(r => r.status === 429).length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
});

Security Checklist

Authentication

  • Strong password requirements (12+ chars)
  • Password hashing (bcrypt, scrypt, Argon2)
  • MFA for sensitive operations
  • Account lockout after failed attempts
  • Session ID changes after login
  • Session timeout

Authorization

  • Check authorization on every request
  • Least privilege principle
  • No horizontal escalation
  • No vertical escalation

Data Protection

  • HTTPS everywhere
  • Encrypted at rest
  • Secrets not in code/logs
  • PII compliance (GDPR)

Input Validation

  • Server-side validation
  • Parameterized queries (no SQL injection)
  • Output encoding (no XSS)
  • Rate limiting

CI/CD Integration

# GitHub Actions
security-checks:
  steps:
    - name: Dependency audit
      run: npm audit --audit-level=high

    - name: SAST scan
      run: npm run sast

    - name: Secret scan
      uses: trufflesecurity/trufflehog@main

    - name: DAST scan
      if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'
      run: docker run owasp/zap2docker-stable zap-baseline.py -t https://staging.example.com

Pre-commit hooks:

#!/bin/sh
git-secrets --scan
npm run lint:security

Agent-Assisted Security Testing

// Comprehensive multi-layer scan
await Task("Security Scan", {
  target: 'src/',
  layers: { sast: true, dast: true, dependencies: true, secrets: true },
  severity: ['critical', 'high', 'medium']
}, "qe-security-scanner");

// OWASP Top 10 testing
await Task("OWASP Scan", {
  categories: ['broken-access-control', 'injection', 'cryptographic-failures'],
  depth: 'comprehensive'
}, "qe-security-scanner");

// Validate fix
await Task("Validate Fix", {
  vulnerability: 'CVE-2024-12345',
  expectedResolution: 'upgrade package to v2.0.0',
  retestAfterFix: true
}, "qe-security-scanner");

Agent Coordination Hints

Memory Namespace

aqe/security/
├── scans/*           - Scan results
├── vulnerabilities/* - Found vulnerabilities
├── fixes/*           - Remediation tracking
└── compliance/*      - Compliance status

Fleet Coordination

const securityFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
  strategy: 'security-testing',
  agents: [
    'qe-security-scanner',
    'qe-api-contract-validator',
    'qe-quality-analyzer',
    'qe-deployment-readiness'
  ],
  topology: 'parallel'
});

Common Mistakes

❌ Security by Obscurity

Hiding admin at /super-secret-adminUse proper auth

❌ Client-Side Validation Only

JavaScript validation can be bypassed → Always validate server-side

❌ Trusting User Input

Assuming input is safe → Sanitize, validate, escape all input

❌ Hardcoded Secrets

API keys in code → Environment variables, secret management


Compliance & Agent CLI

For v3 agent-specific commands (aqe security...), SAST/DAST scanning code, compliance audits (SOC2/GDPR/HIPAA), secret detection, and security gates, see references/compliance-agent-commands.md.

Related Skills


Remember

Think like an attacker: What would you try to break? Test that. Build like a defender: Assume input is malicious until proven otherwise. Test continuously: Security testing is ongoing, not one-time.

With Agents: Agents automate vulnerability scanning, track remediation, and validate fixes. Use agents to maintain security posture at scale.

Run History

After each security scan, append results to run-history.json in this skill directory:

node -e "
const fs = require('fs');
const h = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync('.claude/skills/security-testing/run-history.json'));
h.runs.push({date: new Date().toISOString().split('T')[0], scan_types: ['sast','deps'], findings: {critical: 0, high: 0, medium: 0, low: 0}});
fs.writeFileSync('.claude/skills/security-testing/run-history.json', JSON.stringify(h, null, 2));
"

Read run-history.json before each scan — track finding count by severity over time. Alert if critical findings increase.

Skill Composition

  • During code review → Use with /code-review-quality for combined quality + security review
  • Validate findings → Use /pentest-validation to prove exploitability
  • Compliance → Use /compliance-testing for regulatory requirements

Gotchas

  • npm audit may report false positives for dev dependencies — filter with --omit=dev for production-relevant results
  • Agent may skip DAST in favor of faster SAST-only scans — explicitly request both if needed
  • security-compliance domain has 100% success rate — use as model for other skill reliability
  • When scanning dependencies, check both direct and transitive — npm audit --all catches nested vulnerabilities

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

27.86%
按下载量换算203

trae

21.13%
按下载量换算154

Antigravity

17.23%
按下载量换算125

github-copilot

12.17%
按下载量换算89

windsurf

7.33%
按下载量换算53

Codex

3.09%
按下载量换算22

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

可疑

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills