Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
效率执行命令clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

scenario-war-room情景作战室

Agent Skill

scenario-war-room 用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试和回归验证,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要补充测试、分析失败日志或验证功能改动时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

11,138

周安装

455

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

3,567
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:scenario-war-room(情景作战室)
来源仓库:https://github.com/alirezarezvani/scenario-war-room
安装命令:
openclaw skills install scenario-war-room
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install scenario-war-room

简介

级联多变量场景建模,支持跨职能假设压力测试。

  • 适合复杂系统风险分析和应急响应。适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。
  • 模拟所有变量联动效应,输出缓解策略。
  • 需明确输入参数边界,避免过度简化现实情况。
  • scenario-war-room 属于效率类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

name
scenario-war-room
description
Cross-functional what-if modeling for cascading multi-variable scenarios. Unlike single-assumption stress testing, this models compound adversity across all business functions simultaneously. Use when facing complex risk scenarios, strategic decisions with major downside, or when the user asks 'what if X AND Y both happen?'
license
MIT
metadata
version
1.0.0
author
Alireza Rezvani
category
c-level
domain
strategic-planning
updated
2026-03-05
python-tools
scenario_modeler.py
frameworks
scenario-planning

Scenario War Room

Model cascading what-if scenarios across all business functions. Not single-assumption stress tests — compound adversity that shows how one problem creates the next.

Keywords

scenario planning, war room, what-if analysis, risk modeling, cascading effects, compound risk, adversity planning, contingency planning, stress test, crisis planning, multi-variable scenario, pre-mortem

Quick Start

python scripts/scenario_modeler.py   # Interactive scenario builder with cascade modeling

Or describe the scenario:

/war-room "What if we lose our top customer AND miss the Q3 fundraise?"
/war-room "What if 3 engineers quit AND we need to ship by Q3?"
/war-room "What if our market shrinks 30% AND a competitor raises $50M?"

What This Is Not

  • Not a single-assumption stress test (that's /em:stress-test)
  • Not financial modeling only — every function gets modeled
  • Not worst-case-only — models 3 severity levels
  • Not paralysis by analysis — outputs concrete hedges and triggers

Framework: 6-Step Cascade Model

Step 1: Define Scenario Variables (max 3)

State each variable with:

  • What changes — specific, quantified if possible
  • Probability — your best estimate
  • Timeline — when it hits
Variable A: Top customer (28% ARR) gives 60-day termination notice
  Probability: 15% | Timeline: Within 90 days

Variable B: Series A fundraise delayed 6 months beyond target close
  Probability: 25% | Timeline: Q3

Variable C: Lead engineer resigns
  Probability: 20% | Timeline: Unknown

Step 2: Domain Impact Mapping

For each variable, each relevant role models impact:

DomainOwnerModels
Cash & runwayCFOBurn impact, runway change, bridge options
RevenueCROARR gap, churn cascade risk, pipeline
ProductCPORoadmap impact, PMF risk
EngineeringCTOVelocity impact, key person risk
PeopleCHROAttrition cascade, hiring freeze implications
OperationsCOOCapacity, OKR impact, process risk
SecurityCISOCompliance timeline risk
MarketCMOCAC impact, competitive exposure

Step 3: Cascade Effect Mapping

This is the core. Show how Variable A triggers consequences in domains that trigger Variable B's effects:

TRIGGER: Customer churn ($560K ARR)
  ↓
CFO: Runway drops 14 → 8 months
  ↓
CHRO: Hiring freeze; retention risk increases (morale hit)
  ↓
CTO: 3 open engineering reqs frozen; roadmap slips
  ↓
CPO: Q4 feature launch delayed → customer retention risk
  ↓
CRO: NRR drops; existing accounts see reduced velocity → more churn risk
  ↓
CFO: [Secondary cascade — potential death spiral if not interrupted]

Name the cascade explicitly. Show where it can be interrupted.

Step 4: Severity Matrix

Model three scenarios:

ScenarioDefinitionRecovery
BaseOne variable hits; others don'tManageable with plan
StressTwo variables hit simultaneouslyRequires significant response
SevereAll variables hit; full cascadeExistential; requires board intervention

For each severity level:

  • Runway impact
  • ARR impact
  • Headcount impact
  • Timeline to unacceptable state (trigger point)

Step 5: Trigger Points (Early Warning Signals)

Define the measurable signal that tells you a scenario is unfolding before it's confirmed:

Trigger for Customer Churn Risk:
  - Sponsor goes dark for >3 weeks
  - Usage drops >25% MoM
  - No Q1 QBR confirmed by Dec 1

Trigger for Fundraise Delay:
  - <3 term sheets after 60 days of process
  - Lead investor requests >30-day extension on DD
  - Competitor raises at lower valuation (market signal)

Trigger for Engineering Attrition:
  - Glassdoor activity from engineering team
  - 2+ referral interview requests from engineers
  - Above-market offer counter-required in last 3 months

Step 6: Hedging Strategies

For each scenario: actions to take now (before the scenario materializes) that reduce impact if it does.

HedgeCostImpactOwnerDeadline
Establish $500K credit line$5K/yearBuys 3 months if churn hitsCFO60 days
12-month retention bonus for 3 key engineers$90KLocks team through fundraiseCHRO30 days
Diversify to <20% revenue concentration per customerSales effortReduces single-customer riskCRO2 quarters
Compress fundraise timeline, start parallel processCEO timeCloses before runways mergeCEOImmediate

Output Format

Every war room session produces:

SCENARIO: [Name]
Variables: [A, B, C]
Most likely path: [which combination actually plays out, with probability]

SEVERITY LEVELS
Base (A only): [runway/ARR impact] — recovery: [X actions]
Stress (A+B): [runway/ARR impact] — recovery: [X actions]
Severe (A+B+C): [runway/ARR impact] — existential risk: [yes/no]

CASCADE MAP
[A → domain impact → B trigger → domain impact → end state]

EARLY WARNING SIGNALS
- [Signal 1 → which scenario it indicates]
- [Signal 2 → which scenario it indicates]
- [Signal 3 → which scenario it indicates]

HEDGES (take these actions now)
1. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date]
2. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date]
3. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date]

RECOMMENDED DECISION
[One paragraph. What to do, in what order, and why.]

Rules for Good War Room Sessions

Max 3 variables per scenario. More than 3 is noise — you can't meaningfully prepare for 5-variable collapse. Model the 3 that actually worry you.

Quantify or estimate. "Revenue drops" is not useful. "$420K ARR at risk over 60 days" is. Use ranges if uncertain.

Don't stop at first-order effects. The damage is always in the cascade, not the initial hit.

Model recovery, not just impact. Every scenario should have a "what we do" path.

Separate base case from sensitivity. Don't conflate "what probably happens" with "what could happen."

Don't over-model. 3-4 scenarios per planning cycle is the right number. More creates analysis paralysis.


Common Scenarios by Stage

Seed:

  • Co-founder leaves + product misses launch
  • Funding runs out + bridge terms unfavorable

Series A:

  • Miss ARR target + fundraise delayed
  • Key customer churns + competitor raises

Series B:

  • Market contraction + burn multiple spikes
  • Lead investor wants pivot + team resists

Integration with C-Suite Roles

Scenario TypePrimary RolesCascade To
Revenue missCRO, CFOCMO (pipeline), COO (cuts), CHRO (layoffs)
Key person departureCHRO, COOCTO (if eng), CRO (if sales)
Fundraise failureCFO, CEOCOO (runway extension), CHRO (hiring freeze)
Security breachCISO, CTOCEO (comms), CFO (cost), CRO (customer impact)
Market shiftCEO, CPOCMO (repositioning), CRO (new segments)
Competitor moveCMO, CROCPO (roadmap response), CEO (strategy)

References

  • references/scenario-planning.md — Shell methodology, pre-mortem, Monte Carlo, cascade frameworks
  • scripts/scenario_modeler.py — CLI tool for structured scenario modeling

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

74.06%
按下载量换算2,642

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 openclaw skills install scenario-war-room 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills