Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

sales-proposal-analytics销售提案分析

Agent Skill

用于辅助数据整理、表格处理、CSV/Excel 分析、指标计算和图表准备。它适合让 Agent 清洗字段、汇总数据、发现异常、生成统计口径或把分析结果转成可读说明。使用时需要确认数据来源、字段含义和时间范围,避免把样本数据当全量事实;涉及敏感数据、导出文件或批量写回时,应先确认权限和脱敏边界。

总安装

1,544

周安装

65

GitHub Stars

13

下载量

541
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:sales-proposal-analytics(销售提案分析)
来源仓库:https://github.com/sales-skills/sales
仓库路径:skills/sales-proposal-analytics
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/sales-skills/sales --skill sales-proposal-analytics
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/sales-skills/sales --skill sales-proposal-analytics

简介

用于辅助销售提案中的数据分析与可视化准备,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中处理表格与指标。

  • 可清洗字段、汇总数据、发现异常值,并生成统计口径或图表说明。
  • 通过 GitHub 安装后,结合具体任务调用,返回分析结果与建议,不虚构数据结论。
  • 使用时需确认数据来源与字段含义,避免将样本当全量;涉及导出或写回时应先确认权限与脱敏规则。
  • 建议核对时间范围与数据完整性,防止因缺失字段导致误判。

SKILL.md

Interpret Qwilr Proposal Analytics

Help the user read Qwilr engagement signals and turn them into concrete next steps — follow-up messages, strategy adjustments, or deal actions.

Step 1 — Gather context

If references/learnings.md exists, read it first for accumulated knowledge.

Ask the user:

  1. What are the analytics showing?

- A) Prospect viewed the proposal (single view) - B) Prospect viewed multiple times - C) Multiple people viewed it (committee/forwarded) - D) Prospect hasn't viewed it at all - E) Prospect viewed specific sections heavily (e.g., pricing) - F) Prospect partially accepted (selected some items, not all) - G) Prospect accepted the proposal - H) Other — describe the signals

  1. How long since you sent it?

- A) Less than 24 hours - B) 1-3 days - C) 4-7 days - D) More than a week - E) More than 2 weeks

  1. Deal context:

- What's the deal size and product/service? - Who's the buyer (title, decision-making authority)? - Is there a competitive situation? - What was the last conversation like before sending?

If the user's request already provides most of this context, skip directly to the relevant step. Lead with your best-effort answer using reasonable assumptions (stated explicitly), then ask only the most critical 1-2 clarifying questions at the end — don't gate your response behind gathering complete context.

Step 2 — Signal interpretation

Interpret the engagement pattern using this framework:

View patterns and what they mean

SignalLikely MeaningUrgency
Viewed once, brieflySkimmed it, may return later — or may not be prioritizingMedium
Viewed once, spent time on pricingEvaluating cost, possibly comparing to alternativesHigh
Viewed multiple timesActively considering, possibly building internal caseHigh
Multiple unique viewersBeing circulated to buying committee — deal is progressingHigh
Pricing section revisited 3+ timesPrice sensitivity or building a budget justificationHigh
Executive summary skipped, jumped to pricingBuyer already understands the value, focused on costMedium
Not viewed after 24hEmail may not have landed, or not a priority right nowMedium
Not viewed after 3+ daysDelivery issue, lost priority, or buyer is going darkHigh
Viewed then went silentMay be discussing internally, or lost momentumMedium-High
Partial acceptanceWants some items but not others — negotiation opportunityHigh

Multiple-viewer analysis

When multiple people view the proposal:

  • 2-3 viewers: Normal buying committee circulation. The original contact is championing internally.
  • 4+ viewers: Larger committee than expected — deal may be more complex. Ask about procurement involvement.
  • New viewer after silence: The proposal was forwarded up — a good sign, but the new viewer may need different framing.
  • Same person, different times: They're returning to it — likely building a case or comparing options.

Step 3 — Action plan

Based on the signals, provide concrete next steps:

If viewed and engaged (positive signals)

  1. Don't jump in immediately — let them finish evaluating (unless they've viewed 3+ times with no action)
  2. Send a value-add follow-up — share a relevant case study, ROI data, or answer a question they didn't ask yet
  3. Offer to walk through it — "I saw you've had a chance to review — want to jump on a quick call to walk through the pricing options?"

If not viewed

  1. Check delivery — confirm the email landed (check spam, verify address)
  2. Re-send with a different subject line — the original email may not have cut through
  3. Try a different channel — phone call (most direct), LinkedIn message (visible even if email is buried), text/SMS (if you have the number and the relationship supports it). Don't keep using the same channel that isn't working.
  4. Reduce friction — "Here's the one-page summary" with a link back to the full proposal

If pricing section is getting heavy attention

  1. Proactively address value — send an ROI breakdown or case study showing cost justification
  2. Offer flexibility — "I noticed you're reviewing the pricing — happy to discuss options that fit your budget"
  3. Don't discount preemptively — let them raise the concern first

If multiple stakeholders are viewing

  1. Ask your champion — "It looks like a few people on your team are reviewing — should I put together a summary for the broader group?"
  2. Create stakeholder-specific content — technical details for engineering, ROI for finance, timeline for ops
  3. Offer a group walkthrough — bring all stakeholders into one call

If buyer went dark

  1. Day 3-5: Light touch — share something useful (article, case study), don't ask "did you see my proposal?"
  2. Day 7-10: Direct but empathetic — "I know things get busy. Is this still a priority for Q2, or should we revisit later?"
  3. Day 14+: Break-up email — "I don't want to keep following up if the timing isn't right. Should I close this out for now?"

Step 4 — Draft follow-up messages

Write 1-2 follow-up messages tailored to the specific engagement pattern. Messages should:

  • Reference the engagement signal *indirectly* (don't say "I see you viewed it 5 times" — that's creepy)
  • Add value, not just ask for status
  • Include a specific, low-friction CTA
  • Match the tone of the deal stage (casual for early, professional for enterprise)

Step 5 — Webhook setup guidance

Help the user set up real-time alerts for future proposals using Qwilr webhooks:

Recommended webhook subscriptions

curl -X POST https://api.qwilr.com/v1/webhooks \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $QWILR_TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "url": "https://your-endpoint.com/qwilr-events",
    "events": ["pageFirstViewed", "pageViewed", "pageAccepted", "pagePartiallyAccepted"]
  }'

Event-to-action mapping

Webhook EventRecommended Action
pageFirstViewedAlert rep in Slack/email — prospect opened the proposal
pageViewed (repeat)Log in CRM — track view count and timing
pageAcceptedUpdate CRM deal stage, notify rep, trigger onboarding
pagePartiallyAcceptedAlert rep — buyer selected some items, follow up on the rest
pagePreviewAcceptedInternal preview was accepted — ready for client review

For full automation setup (CRM sync, Slack notifications, etc.), use /sales-qwilr-automation.

Gotchas

  • Don't over-interpret a single page view. One view could be the prospect, their EA, or an automated CRM preview. A single brief view doesn't mean "they're interested" — it means "someone opened the link." Wait for patterns (repeat views, time spent, multiple viewers) before drawing conclusions.
  • Don't treat all engagement signals equally. Pricing section views are much higher signal than a quick skim of the cover page. Weight your interpretation toward the sections that indicate evaluation behavior (pricing, scope, case studies).
  • Don't recommend aggressive follow-up on automated CRM views. Some CRMs and email tools auto-preview links, generating false "viewed" signals. If a view happens within seconds of sending with zero time on page, it's likely automated.
  • Don't tell the prospect you can see their views. Saying "I noticed you looked at the pricing 3 times" is creepy and breaks trust. Reference engagement signals *indirectly* — "I wanted to see if you had questions about the pricing options."
  • Don't ignore time-of-day context. A prospect reviewing a proposal at 10pm on a Sunday suggests they're doing personal due diligence, possibly building a case. A 30-second view during business hours is likely a quick skim between meetings.
  • Self-improving: If you discover something not covered here, append it to references/learnings.md with today's date.

Related skills

  • /sales-proposal-page — Write or restructure the proposal itself
  • /sales-qwilr-automation — Set up automated CRM sync and webhook workflows
  • /sales-follow-up — General follow-up strategies (non-Qwilr-specific)
  • /sales-deal-room — For complex deals that need a multi-page deal room
  • /sales-do — Not sure which skill to use? The router matches any sales objective to the right skill. Install: npx skills add sales-skills/sales --skill sales-do

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.89%
按下载量换算189

Claude

29.48%
按下载量换算159

Cursor

19.59%
按下载量换算106

Gemini CLI

8.89%
按下载量换算48

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills