Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索external-servicegithub未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

sales-clay销售粘土

Agent Skill

sales-clay 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

808

周安装

33

GitHub Stars

13

下载量

261
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:sales-clay(销售粘土)
来源仓库:https://github.com/sales-skills/sales
仓库路径:skills/sales-clay
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/sales-skills/sales --skill sales-clay
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/sales-skills/sales --skill sales-clay

简介

sales-clay 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。

  • 适用于销售研究、信息检索和线索筛选等需要精准匹配来源仓库的场景。
  • 通过关键词或任务描述触发,返回符合条件的候选结果列表,支持进一步交互验证。
  • 安装命令为 npx skills add https://github.com/sales-skills/sales --skill sales-clay,需确认权限范围和维护状态。
  • 使用前请核实是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作,避免安全风险。

SKILL.md

Clay Platform Help

Help the user with Clay platform questions — from waterfall enrichment and Claygent AI agents through Sculptor workflows, Signals, Audiences, Ad Sync, Email Sequencer, CRM sync, and webhook/API integrations.

Step 1 — Gather context

If references/learnings.md exists, read it first for accumulated knowledge.

Ask the user:

  1. What area of Clay do you need help with?

- A) Waterfall Enrichment — finding emails, phones, firmographics via 150+ providers - B) Claygent — AI research agents for prospect research, web scraping, gated content - C) Sculptor — building workflows with natural language, conditional logic, automation - D) Signals — tracking job changes, promotions, funding, website visits - E) Audiences — dynamic buyer segments from CRM + enrichment + signals - F) Ad Sync — pushing audiences to LinkedIn, Meta, Google Ads - G) Email Sequencer — native outbound email sequences - H) CRM Sync — Salesforce, HubSpot, Dynamics 365 bidirectional sync - I) Webhooks & HTTP API — inbound/outbound data flow, external API calls - J) Data Credits & Billing — credit usage, plan optimization, provider costs - K) Something else — describe it

  1. What's your role?

- A) Sales rep / AE / BDR - B) Sales manager / team lead - C) RevOps / GTM Ops - D) Marketing / Growth - E) Founder / solo seller - F) GTM Engineer - G) Other

  1. What are you trying to accomplish? (describe your specific goal or question)

If the user's request already provides most of this context, skip directly to the relevant step. Lead with your best-effort answer using reasonable assumptions (stated explicitly), then ask only the most critical 1-2 clarifying questions at the end — don't gate your response behind gathering complete context.

Step 2 — Route or answer directly

If the request maps to a specialized skill, route:

  • Enrichment strategy / provider comparison → /sales-enrich
  • Cadence strategy / sequence design → /sales-cadence
  • Intent signal strategy / prioritization → /sales-intent
  • B2B advertising strategy → /sales-b2b-advertising
  • CRM data hygiene strategy → /sales-data-hygiene
  • Prospect list building strategy → /sales-prospect-list
  • Lead scoring model design → /sales-lead-score
  • Tool integration architecture → /sales-integration

Otherwise, answer directly using the platform reference below.

Step 3 — Clay platform reference

Read references/platform-guide.md for detailed module documentation, pricing, integrations, and data model.

*You no longer need the platform guide details — focus on the user's specific situation.*

Step 4 — Actionable guidance

When answering, always:

  1. Specify the plan requirement — many features are plan-gated. Don't recommend CRM Sync to a Free user.
  2. Include credit impact — waterfall enrichment burns credits fast. Help users optimize provider order and "only if empty" logic.
  3. Recommend testing at small scale — always test on 5-50 rows before running enrichment or Claygent on thousands.
  4. Link to Clay University — point users to university.clay.com for detailed guides on specific features.
  5. Consider the full workflow — Clay is most powerful when enrichment → signals → sequencing → CRM sync work together. Help users build end-to-end workflows, not isolated steps.

Gotchas

*Best-effort from research — review these, especially items about plan-gated features and integration gotchas that may be outdated.*

  1. Credit burn from waterfall enrichment is the #1 surprise cost. Each provider in a waterfall consumes credits independently. A 5-provider waterfall on 10,000 rows can burn 50,000 credits if you're not using "only if empty" logic. Always test on small batches and monitor credit usage in table settings.
  2. No public REST API — webhook-only integration model. Clay doesn't expose traditional API endpoints for managing tables or data programmatically. All external integration is via inbound webhooks (POST to table URL) and outbound HTTP API actions. This surprises developers expecting a standard CRUD API.
  3. CRM Sync requires Growth plan ($446+/mo). Many users sign up for Launch expecting to sync with Salesforce/HubSpot, then discover CRM sync is plan-gated. Same for HTTP API and webhooks — all require Growth.
  4. Claygent results vary with prompt quality. AI research agents are powerful but sensitive to instruction quality. Vague prompts produce inconsistent results. Always write specific, structured instructions and test on 5-10 rows before scaling.
  5. Data credit costs vary by provider — not all enrichments cost the same. A Hunter email lookup might cost 1 credit while a ZoomInfo enrichment costs 10+. The waterfall order matters for cost optimization, not just coverage.
  • Self-improving: If you discover something not covered here, append it to references/learnings.md with today's date.

Step 5 — Related skills

  • /sales-enrich — Enrichment strategy across all tools (for choosing providers, comparing approaches)
  • /sales-cadence — Multi-channel outbound sequence design (for cadence strategy beyond Clay's sequencer)
  • /sales-intent — Buying signals and account prioritization (for signal strategy beyond Clay's Signals)
  • /sales-prospect-list — Building targeted prospect lists (for list strategy)
  • /sales-lead-score — Lead scoring models (for scoring strategy using Clay's enrichment data)
  • /sales-b2b-advertising — B2B advertising strategy (for ad strategy beyond Clay's Ad Sync)
  • /sales-data-hygiene — CRM data hygiene (for data quality strategy using Clay's CRM sync)
  • /sales-integration — Connecting tools with webhooks, Zapier, APIs
  • /sales-do — Not sure which skill to use? The router matches any sales objective to the right skill. Install: npx skills add sales-skills/sales --skill sales-do

Examples

Example 1: Setting up waterfall enrichment for work emails

User says: "I have a list of 5,000 leads with names and companies but no emails. How do I find their work emails in Clay?" Skill does: Recommends waterfall enrichment with provider order (Hunter → Dropcontact → Apollo → People Data Labs), "only if empty" logic between steps, small batch test first (50 rows), and credit budget estimate. Result: Step-by-step waterfall setup with provider prioritization and cost optimization.

Example 2: Building an intent-triggered outbound workflow

User says: "I want to automatically enrich and email prospects when they change jobs at target accounts." Skill does: Walks through Signals setup (job change trigger), enrichment waterfall for new role details, Claygent for company research, Email Sequencer for personalized outreach, and CRM sync to log activity. Notes Launch plan minimum for Signals. Result: End-to-end automated workflow from signal detection through outbound.

Example 3: Clay vs Apollo for enrichment

User says: "Should I use Clay or Apollo for contact enrichment? We already have Apollo." Skill does: Explains Clay's waterfall approach (150+ providers, higher coverage) vs Apollo's single-database model (275M+ contacts, simpler). Notes Clay as an enrichment orchestrator that can include Apollo as one provider. Recommends Clay for teams needing maximum coverage; Apollo alone for teams prioritizing simplicity and built-in outbound. Result: Clear comparison with recommendation based on team needs.

Troubleshooting

Waterfall enrichment returning low match rates

Symptom: Running waterfall enrichment but only getting 30-40% email coverage. Cause: Provider order may not be optimized, or input data quality is poor (misspelled company names, outdated titles). Solution: Clean input data first — standardize company names and verify LinkedIn URLs. Reorder providers with highest-coverage providers first. Add more providers to the waterfall (5-7 is typical for 80%+ coverage). Check that "only if empty" logic is working correctly between providers. Test with a small batch to identify which providers perform best for your ICP.

Credits running out faster than expected

Symptom: Data Credits depleted before the monthly cycle ends. Cause: Waterfall enrichment without "only if empty" logic queries every provider for every row, even if the first one succeeds. Multi-column enrichment compounds costs (email + phone + company = 3x credits per row). Solution: Add "only if empty" conditions between waterfall steps. Prioritize cheaper providers first. Run enrichment on high-priority segments rather than entire database. Monitor per-provider credit consumption in table settings. Consider upgrading plan for more credits if the ROI justifies it.

CRM sync not working

Symptom: Enriched data isn't syncing back to Salesforce/HubSpot. Cause: CRM sync requires Growth plan ($446+/mo). Also, field mapping must be configured correctly — Clay column names must map to CRM field API names, not display labels. Solution: Verify you're on Growth plan or above. Check field mapping in the CRM integration settings — use API field names (e.g., Email not "Email Address"). Test sync with a single row before bulk operations. Check CRM-side permissions — the connected user needs create/update access on the target object.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.36%
按下载量换算90

Claude

30.82%
按下载量换算80

Cursor

21.51%
按下载量换算56

Gemini CLI

8.83%
按下载量换算23

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills