Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
前端设计只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

running-design-reviews运行设计评审

Agent Skill

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范、排版、配色、布局和交互体验优化。它适合让 Agent 根据产品场景整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案、检查视觉一致性或改进组件层级。使用时需要结合现有品牌、设计系统和用户任务,不应只堆装饰元素;涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现。

总安装

24,229

周安装

985

GitHub Stars

734

下载量

8,096
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:running-design-reviews(运行设计评审)
来源仓库:https://github.com/refoundai/lenny-skills
仓库路径:skills/running-design-reviews
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/refoundai/lenny-skills --skill running-design-reviews
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/refoundai/lenny-skills --skill running-design-reviews

简介

使用反馈层次结构和结构化批评来运行设计评审的框架。

  • 首先按价值优先考虑反馈(是否解决问题?),然后是可用性,然后是愉悦感;推迟审美关注,直到核心价值得到验证
  • 指定高级领导作为项目发起人,通过现场演示来监督质量,并在发布前审查 100% 的已发货屏幕
  • 围绕具体反馈请求构建审核;询问演示者到底需要什么类型的输入,而不是进行非结构化的批评
  • 先从大局评估开始,再讨论细节;使用模糊视觉来评估整体凝聚力,而不是像素级细节
  • 包括要避免的常见错误:将审美观点与核心关注点混合在一起,审查静态平台而不是交互式原型,以及在没有明确质量标准的情况下发货

SKILL.md

Running Design Reviews

Help the user run effective design reviews and critiques using frameworks from 8 product leaders.

How to Help

When the user asks for help with design reviews:

  1. Understand the review context - Ask what stage the design is at and what kind of feedback is needed
  2. Establish the hierarchy - Help them prioritize feedback by value, then usability, then delight
  3. Structure the critique - Guide them on how to frame feedback constructively
  4. Set the quality bar - Help them define what "good enough to ship" means

Core Principles

Follow the feedback hierarchy: Value, then Ease of Use, then Delight

Julie Zhuo: "The first thing that's most important to address is, well, is this thing actually valuable, is this solving the problem? Then once we do that, then let's focus on the next layer which I think about as ease of use... And then finally... delight." Disregard feedback about aesthetics until the core value proposition is validated.

Assign sponsors for major projects

Karri Saarinen: "We are basically the sponsors for the projects. So then we are responsible reviewing the work. And so we might just have a meeting where we go through, okay..." Assign a founder or senior leader as a sponsor for every major project to oversee quality through live demos rather than static slide decks.

Review 100% of shipped screens

Dmitry Zlokazov: "Founders of the company, they still review a hundred percent of screens that are being shipped and everything that you will see in the app pass this review." Maintain a high quality bar by having senior leaders review every user-facing screen before shipping.

Structure reviews around specific feedback requests

Geoff Charles: "Any large rock that we have on the roadmap needs to be brought into the product review process... but it needs to be structured in a way where you are asking specifically for what type of feedback you want." Only bring high-risk decisions to formal reviews and require presenters to specify exactly what feedback they need.

Start big picture before minutiae

Jessica Hische: "Always think big picture before you think minutiae, because sometimes people think that... They'll throw a bunch of minutiae stuff at me, but it's because they don't know what's really bugging them." Ask "What is the overall thing that's bothering me?" before commenting on specific elements.

Use blurred vision to see cohesiveness

Jessica Hische: "Use 'blurred eyes' to look at a brand's overall cohesiveness rather than focusing on individual pixels." Step back from details to assess whether the overall design holds together.

Questions to Help Users

  • "What specific type of feedback are you looking for in this review?"
  • "Is the core value proposition clear? Does this solve the right problem?"
  • "Before we discuss details - what's the overall feeling when you first look at this?"
  • "What are the highest-risk elements of this design that need the most scrutiny?"
  • "What would make this not shippable? Are we close to that line?"
  • "If a user sees this for three seconds, what will they understand?"

Common Mistakes to Flag

  • Feedback without hierarchy - Mixing aesthetic opinions with core value concerns
  • Static reviews - Reviewing slide decks instead of interactive demos
  • Unstructured feedback requests - Not specifying what kind of feedback is needed
  • Skipping to details - Critiquing pixels before validating the concept
  • No quality bar - Shipping without senior review or clear standards

Deep Dive

For all 10 insights from 8 guests, see references/guest-insights.md

Related Skills

  • product-taste-intuition
  • running-effective-meetings
  • scoping-cutting

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.72%
按下载量换算2,973

Claude

32.93%
按下载量换算2,666

Cursor

17.19%
按下载量换算1,392

Gemini CLI

10.21%
按下载量换算827

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills