Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发敏感数据clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

run-test-plan运行测试计划

Agent Skill

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

总安装

2,917

周安装

118

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

916
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:run-test-plan(运行测试计划)
来源仓库:https://github.com/anderskev/run-test-plan
安装命令:
openclaw skills install run-test-plan
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install run-test-plan

简介

run-test-plan 执行 YAML 测试计划并提供调试信息,用于开发验证。

  • 适用于 OpenClaw 中自动化测试与回归检查场景。
  • 通过 clawhub 安装,命令为 openclaw skills install run-test-plan。
  • 使用前需确认项目测试框架与运行环境,避免命令执行失败。
  • 建议查看来源仓库了解 YAML 语法与失败处理机制。

SKILL.md

description
Execute YAML test plan, stop on first failure, output rich debug prompt
name
run-test-plan
disable-model-invocation
true

Run Test Plan

Execute a YAML test plan, run setup commands, health checks, and each test sequentially. Stop on first failure with rich debug output.

Prerequisites

  • agent-browser skill: Browser tests require the agent-browser:agent-browser skill to be available

Arguments

  • --plan <path>: Path to test plan (default: docs/testing/test-plan.yaml)
  • --skip-setup: Skip setup commands and health checks (for re-running after failure)

Step 1: Parse Test Plan

Read and validate the test plan:

# Resolve plan path from --plan (default shown)
PLAN_PATH="${PLAN_PATH:-docs/testing/test-plan.yaml}"

# Check file exists
ls "$PLAN_PATH" || { echo "Error: Test plan not found: $PLAN_PATH"; exit 1; }

# Validate YAML
python3 -c "import yaml; yaml.safe_load(open('$PLAN_PATH'))" || { echo "Error: Invalid YAML: $PLAN_PATH"; exit 1; }

Extract from the YAML:

  • setup.commands: List of setup commands
  • setup.health_checks: List of URLs to poll
  • tests: Array of test cases

Step 2: Run Setup (unless --skip-setup)

2a. Check Prerequisites

If setup.prerequisites exists, verify each one:

# For each prerequisite in setup.prerequisites
<prerequisite.check> || { echo "Prerequisite not met: <prerequisite.name>"; exit 1; }

2b. Set Environment Variables

If setup.env exists, export each variable. Variables using ${VAR} syntax should be resolved from the current environment:

# For each key/value in setup.env
export <key>="<value>"

2c. Build

If setup.build exists, execute build commands sequentially:

# For each command in setup.build
<command> || { echo "Build failed: <command>"; exit 1; }

2d. Start Services

If setup.services exists, start long-running processes and wait for health checks:

# For each service in setup.services
nohup <service.command> > .beagle/service-<index>.log 2>&1 &
echo $! > .beagle/service-<index>.pid

For each service with a health_check, poll until ready:

timeout=<service.health_check.timeout or 30>
url=<service.health_check.url>
elapsed=0

while [ $elapsed -lt $timeout ]; do
  if curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "$url" | grep -qE "^(200|301|302)"; then
    echo "✓ Health check passed: $url"
    break
  fi
  sleep 2
  elapsed=$((elapsed + 2))
done

if [ $elapsed -ge $timeout ]; then
  echo "✗ Health check timeout: $url"
  exit 1
fi

2e. Legacy Setup Format

If the plan uses the older flat format (setup.commands + setup.health_checks instead of prerequisites/build/services), fall back to executing setup.commands sequentially and polling setup.health_checks as before.

Step 3: Gate — setup ready before tests

Do not start Step 4 until each condition you can check is true:

  1. Plan load: The file from --plan (default docs/testing/test-plan.yaml) exists and parses as YAML (same checks as Step 1).
  2. Setup branch:

- If not using --skip-setup: Every setup.prerequisites check that exists exited 0; every setup.build command succeeded; every service health_check reached HTTP 200, 301, or 302 within its timeout or legacy setup.health_checks passed after setup.commands. - If using --skip-setup: Before TC-01, confirm anything the plan still needs is alive—at minimum one successful curl (or equivalent) to each URL in setup.health_checks or each setup.services[].health_check.url that the tests depend on.

  1. Evidence path: mkdir -p docs/testing/evidence succeeds and the directory exists.

If any gate fails, stop, fix setup or flags, and do not execute tests.

Step 4: Execute Tests Sequentially

For each test in the plan:

4a. Log Test Start

## Running: TC-XX - <test.name>

Context: <test.context>

4b. Execute Steps

For each step in test.steps, determine the step type and execute accordingly:

Shell commands (run: steps):

The most common step type. Execute the command via Bash and capture stdout, stderr, and exit code:

# Execute the command, capture output and exit code
<command> 2>&1
echo "EXIT_CODE: $?"

Capture all output for evaluation in step 4c. Shell steps cover:

  • CLI binary invocations (e.g., ./target/debug/myapp status --all)
  • Database queries (e.g., psql "${DATABASE_URL}" -c "SELECT ...")
  • File inspection (e.g., ls -la /path/to/expected/output)
  • Process lifecycle checks (e.g., timeout 5 ./myapp 2>&1 || true)
  • Any other command a human would type in a terminal

curl actions (action: curl steps):

curl -X <method> \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  <additional headers> \
  -d '<body>' \
  "<url>" \
  -o response.json \
  -w "%{http_code}" > status_code.txt

# Capture response for evaluation
cat response.json
cat status_code.txt

agent-browser CLI actions:

Steps starting with agent-browser are browser automation commands:

# Navigate
agent-browser open <url>

# Snapshot interactive elements (always do before interacting)
agent-browser snapshot -i

# Interact using refs from snapshot output (@e1, @e2, etc.)
agent-browser fill @<ref> "<value>"
agent-browser click @<ref>

# Wait for conditions
agent-browser wait --url "<pattern>"
agent-browser wait --text "<text>"
agent-browser wait --load networkidle

# Capture evidence
agent-browser screenshot docs/testing/evidence/<test.id>.png

Important: Always run agent-browser snapshot -i before interacting with elements to get valid refs, and re-snapshot after navigation or significant DOM changes.

Save screenshots to docs/testing/evidence/<test.id>.png

4c. Evaluate Result

Gate — artifacts before PASS/FAIL:

  • run: steps: Stdout and stderr captured; exit code recorded (e.g. EXIT_CODE: line or equivalent).
  • action: curl steps: Response body and HTTP status captured to known paths (e.g. response.json, status_code.txt or paths the plan specifies).
  • agent-browser steps: After any navigation or DOM change, a fresh agent-browser snapshot -i exists before asserting; if the test records evidence, the screenshot file path is created or failure is explicit.

Then, using agent reasoning, compare actual outcome against test.expected:

  • Read the expected behavior description
  • Compare with actual response/screenshot
  • Determine PASS or FAIL

4d. On PASS

✓ TC-XX PASSED: <test.name>

Continue to next test.

4e. On FAIL

Stop immediately. Go to Step 6.

Step 5: On All Tests Pass

## Test Results: ALL PASSED

| ID | Name | Result |
|----|------|--------|
| TC-01 | <name> | ✓ PASS |
| TC-02 | <name> | ✓ PASS |
| ... | ... | ... |

**Total:** N/N tests passed

### Evidence

Screenshots saved to `docs/testing/evidence/`

### Cleanup

Stopping background services...

Clean up:

# Kill background services
for pidfile in .beagle/service-*.pid .beagle/dev-server.pid; do
  if [ -f "$pidfile" ]; then
    kill $(cat "$pidfile") 2>/dev/null
    rm "$pidfile"
  fi
done

Step 6: On Failure - Generate Debug Prompt

When a test fails, generate rich debug output:

6a. Gather Context

# Get changed files relevant to the failure
git diff --name-only $(git merge-base HEAD origin/main)..HEAD

# Get recent changes in files mentioned in test.context
git diff $(git merge-base HEAD origin/main)..HEAD -- <relevant_files>

6b. Output Debug Report

## Test Failure: TC-XX - <test.name>

### What Failed

**Test:** <test.name>
**Expected:**
<test.expected>

**Actual:**
<Describe what actually happened - response code, error message, screenshot description>

### Relevant Changes in This PR

<For each file mentioned in test.context or related to the failure:>
- `<file>` (lines X-Y) - <brief description of changes>

### Evidence

<If screenshot exists:>
- Screenshot: `docs/testing/evidence/<test.id>.png`

<If API response:>
- Status code: <code>
- Response body:

<response>


### Error Details

<If error message in response or logs:>

<error message>


### Suggested Investigation

<Based on the error, suggest 2-3 specific things to check:>
1. <First thing to check based on error type>
2. <Second thing related to changed files>
3. <Third thing about environment/setup>

### Debug Session Prompt

Copy this to start a new Claude session:

---
I'm debugging a test failure in branch `<branch>`.

**Test:** <test.name>
**Error:** <brief error description>

<Summarize what the test was checking and what went wrong>

Relevant files:
<List changed files related to this test>

Help me investigate why <specific failure reason>.
---

6c. Preserve Evidence

# Ensure evidence directory exists
mkdir -p docs/testing/evidence

# Save failure context
cat > docs/testing/evidence/<test.id>-failure.md << 'EOF'
# Failure Report: <test.id>

<Full debug report content>
EOF

6d. Cleanup and Exit

# Kill background services
for pidfile in .beagle/service-*.pid .beagle/dev-server.pid; do
  if [ -f "$pidfile" ]; then
    kill $(cat "$pidfile") 2>/dev/null
    rm "$pidfile"
  fi
done

Test Results Summary Table

Always output a summary table showing progress:

## Test Results

| ID | Name | Result |
|----|------|--------|
| TC-01 | <name> | ✓ PASS |
| TC-02 | <name> | ✗ FAIL |
| TC-03 | <name> | - SKIP |

**Passed:** 1/3
**Failed:** TC-02

Tests after a failure are marked as SKIP (not executed).

Verification

Before completing:

# Verify evidence directory exists
ls -la docs/testing/evidence/

# List captured evidence
ls docs/testing/evidence/*.png docs/testing/evidence/*.md 2>/dev/null

Pass conditions (all must be true to call the run complete):

  • ls -la docs/testing/evidence/ exits 0 (directory exists).
  • Every test that ran has an explicit PASS or FAIL (not only “felt right”).
  • If any test failed: a failure artifact exists (docs/testing/evidence/<test.id>-failure.md or equivalent) or the debug report was emitted with expected vs actual.
  • Cleanup ran: no stale .beagle/service-*.pid pointing at live processes you started, unless the plan says to leave them up.

Verification Checklist:

  • [ ] Setup commands executed successfully (or --skip-setup with live dependencies confirmed)
  • [ ] Health checks passed before test execution (Step 3 gate)
  • [ ] Each executed test has recorded result
  • [ ] Evidence captured in docs/testing/evidence/
  • [ ] On failure: debug prompt includes expected vs actual
  • [ ] On failure: relevant PR changes listed
  • [ ] Background processes cleaned up

Gates (ordered)

  1. Plan valid: YAML parses; required keys for your branch (setup / tests) are present.
  2. Setup healthy: Step 3 pass conditions met before TC-01.
  3. Per-test artifacts: Step 4c gate satisfied before marking PASS.
  4. Stop on fail: First failure → Step 6; later tests = SKIP in the summary table.
  5. Cleanup: Step 5 or Step 6d executed so background PIDs from this run are released.

Rules

  • Stop on first test failure (do not continue to other tests)
  • Always capture evidence (screenshots, responses)
  • Include file:line references in debug prompts when possible
  • Use --skip-setup flag to re-run after fixing issues
  • Never hardcode secrets - use environment variables
  • Clean up background processes even on failure
  • Preserve failure evidence for debugging
  • Make debug prompts copy-paste ready for new sessions

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

76.21%
按下载量换算698

安全审计

VirusTotal

未展示

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills