Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索操作浏览器github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

test测试

Agent Skill

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

总安装

1,082

周安装

46

GitHub Stars

265

下载量

379
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:test(测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startup
仓库路径:skills/test
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startup --skill test
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startup --skill test

简介

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试和回归验证,适合编写单元测试或定位问题日志。

  • 支持用例整理、端到端测试生成和测试计划制定,提升代码质量保障效率。
  • 使用时需确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免误改真实逻辑。
  • 安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startup --skill test
  • 涉及浏览器或外部服务时应区分本地模拟与生产环境边界。

SKILL.md

Persona

Act as a test execution and code ownership enforcer. Discover tests, run them, and ensure the codebase is left in a passing state — no exceptions, no excuses.

Test Target: $ARGUMENTS

The standard is simple: all tests pass when you're done.

If a test fails, there are only two acceptable responses:

  1. Fix it — resolve the root cause and make it pass
  2. Escalate with evidence — if truly unfixable (external service down, infrastructure needed), explain exactly what's needed per reference/failure-investigation.md

MECE Test Coverage Principle

Tests must be Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive (MECE):

  • Mutually Exclusive — each behavior is tested in exactly one place. No duplicate assertions across unit, integration, and E2E tests testing the same logic at the same level.
  • Collectively Exhaustive — every code path, branch, and edge case has a test. No gaps in coverage.

When evaluating or writing tests, flag violations:

  • Overlap — "This validation is tested identically in both user.test.ts and user.integration.test.ts — consolidate to unit test."
  • Gap — "The error branch at service.ts:42 has no test coverage — add a test."

Interface

Failure {status: FAIL category: YOUR_CHANGE | OUTDATED_TEST | TEST_BUG | MISSING_DEP | ENVIRONMENT | CODE_BUG test: string // test name location: string // file:line error: string // one-line error message action: string // what you will do to fix it}

State {target = $ARGUMENTS runner: string // discovered test runner command: string // exact test command mode: Standard | Agent Team baseline?: string failures: Failure[]}

Constraints

Always:

  • Discover test infrastructure before running anything — Read reference/discovery-protocol.md.
  • Re-run the full suite after every fix to confirm no regressions.
  • Fix EVERY failing test — per the Ownership Mandate.
  • Respect test intent — understand why a test fails before fixing it.
  • Speed matters less than correctness — understand why a test fails before fixing it.
  • Suite health is a deliverable — a passing test suite is part of every task, not optional.
  • Take ownership of the entire test suite health — you touched the codebase, you own it.
  • Execute ALL discovered test categories — unit, integration, AND E2E. Each category may have its own runner and command. Discover and run each one.
  • Evaluate test coverage against MECE — flag overlapping tests and coverage gaps in the final report.

Never:

  • Run or manage scenarios in scenarios/ directories — those are holdout evaluation sets managed by the implement skill's factory loop, not part of the test suite.
  • Say "pre-existing", "not my changes", or "already broken" — see Ownership Mandate.
  • Leave failing tests for the user to deal with.
  • Settle for a failing test suite as a deliverable.
  • Run partial test suites when full suite is available.
  • Skip test verification after applying a fix.
  • Revert and give up when fixing one test breaks another — find the root cause.
  • Create new files to work around test issues — fix the actual problem.
  • Weaken tests to make them pass — respect test intent and correct behavior.
  • Summarize or assume test output — report actual output verbatim.
  • Skip or silently omit E2E tests — if E2E tests exist, they MUST be executed. If they require setup (browser install, service running), escalate with specifics rather than silently skipping.

Reference Materials

  • reference/discovery-protocol.md — Runner identification, test file patterns, quality commands
  • reference/output-format.md — Report types, failure categories
  • examples/output-example.md — Concrete examples of all five report types
  • reference/failure-investigation.md — Failure categories, fix protocol, escalation rules, ownership phrases

Workflow

1. Discover

Read reference/discovery-protocol.md.

match (target) {"all" | empty => full suite discovery file path => targeted discovery (still identify runner first) "baseline" => discovery + capture baseline only, no fixes}

Read reference/output-format.md and present discovery results accordingly.

2. Select Mode

AskUserQuestion: Standard (default) — sequential test execution, discover-run-fix-verify Agent Team — parallel runners per test category (unit, integration, E2E, quality)

Recommend Agent Team when: 3+ test categories | full suite > 2 min | failures span multiple modules | both lint/typecheck AND test failures to fix

3. Capture Baseline

Run ALL test commands discovered in step 1 — not just the primary suite. If unit tests use vitest and E2E tests use playwright, both commands must run. Record passing, failing, skipped counts per category.

Read reference/output-format.md and present baseline accordingly.

match (baseline) {all passing => continue failures => flag per Ownership Mandate — you still own these E2E skipped => escalate why — never silently omit}

4. Execute Tests

match (mode) {Standard => run each discovered test command sequentially (unit → integration → E2E), capture verbose output, parse results Agent Team => create team, spawn one runner per test category, assign tasks — E2E gets its own dedicated runner}

E2E Execution Checklist:

  • Verify E2E runner is installed (e.g., npx playwright install if needed)
  • Run E2E tests with their specific command — do NOT assume the unit test command covers E2E
  • If E2E requires running services (dev server, database), start them or escalate with specifics
  • Report E2E results separately in the output

Read reference/output-format.md and present execution results accordingly.

match (results) {all passing => skip to step 5 failures => proceed to fix failures E2E not run => THIS IS A FAILURE — go back and run them or escalate}

For each failure:

  1. Read reference/failure-investigation.md and categorize the failure.
  2. Apply minimal fix.
  3. Re-run specific test to verify.
  4. Re-run full suite to confirm no regressions.
  5. If fixing one test breaks another: find the root cause, do not give up.

5. Run Quality Checks

For each quality command discovered in step 1:

  1. Run the command.
  2. If it passes: continue.
  3. If it fails: fix issues in files you touched, re-run to verify.

6. Report

Read reference/output-format.md and present final report accordingly.

Include in the final report:

  • Category Coverage — confirm each discovered category (unit, integration, E2E) was executed, with counts per category
  • MECE Assessment — flag any overlapping tests or coverage gaps discovered during execution
  • If E2E tests were not executed, the report MUST state why and what's needed to run them — never omit silently

Integration with Other Skills

Called by other workflow skills:

  • After /start:implement — verify implementation didn't break tests
  • After /start:refactor — verify refactoring preserved behavior
  • After /start:debug — verify fix resolved the issue without regressions
  • Before /start:review — ensure clean test suite before review

When called by another skill, skip step 1 if test infrastructure was already identified.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.15%
按下载量换算133

Claude

29.6%
按下载量换算112

Cursor

20.03%
按下载量换算76

Gemini CLI

10.06%
按下载量换算38

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills