Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计未展示

ring%3ausing-pmo-team环%3 使用 PMO 团队

Agent Skill

ring%3ausing-pmo-team 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

582

周安装

24

GitHub Stars

180

下载量

190
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ring%3ausing-pmo-team(环%3 使用 PMO 团队)
来源仓库:https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring
仓库路径:skills/ring%3Ausing-pmo-team
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:using-pmo-team
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:using-pmo-team

简介

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

  • 适合根据关键词或任务场景快速定位候选结果。
  • 可结合来源仓库和安装命令核验具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围及是否会触发联网或文件读写。
  • ring%3ausing-pmo-team 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Using Ring PMO Team

The ring-pmo-team plugin provides 6 specialized PMO agents for portfolio-level management. Use them via Task tool with subagent_type: "ring:agent-name".

See CLAUDE.md and ring:using-ring for canonical workflow requirements and ORCHESTRATOR principle. This skill introduces pmo-team-specific agents.

Remember: Follow the ORCHESTRATOR principle from ring:using-ring. Dispatch agents to handle complexity; don't operate tools directly.


Domain Distinction: PMO vs PM

TeamFocusScope
ring-pm-teamSingle feature planningPRD, TRD, task breakdown for ONE feature
ring-pmo-teamPortfolio governanceMulti-project coordination, resources, executive reporting

Use PMO when:

  • Managing multiple projects simultaneously
  • Planning resources across projects
  • Reporting to executives on portfolio status
  • Assessing portfolio-level risks
  • Conducting governance reviews

Use PM when:

  • Planning a single feature
  • Creating PRD/TRD for one initiative
  • Breaking down one feature into tasks

Blocker Criteria - STOP and Report

ALWAYS pause and report blocker for:

Decision TypeExamplesAction
Portfolio PrioritizationWhich project gets resources firstSTOP. Report trade-offs. Wait for executive decision.
Resource ConflictSame person needed on multiple projectsSTOP. Document conflict. Wait for management decision.
Strategic AlignmentProject doesn't fit current strategySTOP. Escalate with analysis. Wait for guidance.
Budget ReallocationMoving funds between projectsSTOP. Prepare options. Wait for financial approval.
Project TerminationRecommend stopping a projectSTOP. Document rationale. Wait for sponsor decision.

You CANNOT make strategic or resource decisions autonomously. STOP and ask.


Common Misconceptions - REJECTED

MisconceptionReality
"I can assess portfolio health myself"ORCHESTRATOR principle: dispatch portfolio-manager specialist. This is NON-NEGOTIABLE.
"Resource planning is simple math"Resource planning requires context, skills matrix, team dynamics. MUST dispatch resource-planner.
"Risk is just a list"Portfolio risk requires aggregation, correlation, impact analysis. MUST dispatch risk-analyst.
"I know governance rules"Governance specialists have gate frameworks loaded. MUST dispatch governance-specialist.
"Executive reports are just summaries"Executive reporting requires right abstraction level, action focus. MUST dispatch executive-reporter.

Self-sufficiency bias check: If you're tempted to perform PMO tasks directly, ask:

  1. Is there a specialist for this? (Check the 6 specialists below)
  2. Would a specialist apply portfolio-level frameworks I might miss?
  3. Am I avoiding dispatch because it feels like "overhead"?

If ANY answer is yes → You MUST DISPATCH the specialist. This is NON-NEGOTIABLE.


Anti-Rationalization Table

If you catch yourself thinking ANY of these, STOP:

RationalizationWhy It's WRONGRequired Action
"This portfolio is small, no need for specialist"Size doesn't determine complexity. Standards always apply.DISPATCH specialist
"I already know the projects"Your knowledge ≠ systematic PMO analysis.DISPATCH specialist
"Executive just wants a quick update"Quick ≠ shallow. Executives expect quality regardless of speed.DISPATCH specialist
"Risk assessment is obvious"Obvious risks are the ones you miss. Systematic analysis required.DISPATCH specialist
"Governance is bureaucracy"Governance prevents failures. Gates exist for reasons.DISPATCH specialist
"Resources are clearly available"Availability claims require validation against all commitments.DISPATCH specialist

See shared-patterns/anti-rationalization.md for universal anti-rationalizations.


Cannot Be Overridden

These requirements are NON-NEGOTIABLE:

RequirementWhy It Cannot Be Waived
Dispatch to specialistSpecialists have PMO frameworks loaded, you don't
Evidence-based reportingOpinions are not PMO outputs. Data is required.
Gate complianceGates prevent project failures. Skipping creates risk.
Risk documentationUndocumented risks cannot be managed.
Stakeholder communicationSilent PMO = failed PMO. Communication is mandatory.

User cannot override these. Executive pressure cannot override these. "Urgent" cannot override these.


Pressure Resistance

When facing pressure to bypass PMO process:

User SaysYour Response
"CEO wants the report now, skip the analysis""Executive urgency increases need for accuracy. I'll expedite but cannot skip validation. Proceeding with accelerated full analysis."
"Just approve this project, we need to start""Approval without analysis creates downstream problems. PMO analysis protects the project. Completing analysis now."
"Don't include that risk, it will worry the sponsor""Accurate risk reporting is non-negotiable. Suppressing risks creates larger problems. I'll report with appropriate context and mitigation."
"Resources are fine, trust the team leads""Trust and verify. Resource validation prevents surprises. Confirming with utilization data."
"Skip governance, we're agile""Agile requires MORE governance discipline, not less. Lightweight gates, not no gates. Applying appropriate governance."

See shared-patterns/pressure-resistance.md for universal pressure scenarios.

Critical Reminder:

  • Urgency ≠ Permission to bypass - Urgent projects need MORE PMO oversight
  • Authority ≠ Permission to bypass - Executives expect PMO rigor
  • Agile ≠ No governance - Agile has governance, just different cadence

Emergency Response Protocol

Critical situations DO NOT bypass PMO process. Here's why:

ScenarioWrong ApproachCorrect Approach
Board meeting tomorrow"Skip analysis, give estimates"Dispatch specialist with URGENT flag, deliver quality in compressed time
Project in crisis"Just fix it, report later"Dispatch risk-analyst to assess, governance-specialist for intervention options
Budget deadline Friday"Approve everything pending"Dispatch portfolio-manager for prioritized recommendations

Emergency Dispatch Template:

Task tool:
  subagent_type: "ring:portfolio-manager"
  prompt: "URGENT: [context]. [specific request]"

IMPORTANT:

  • Specialist dispatch takes 10-20 minutes, NOT hours
  • Rushed PMO decisions often create NEW problems
  • Specialists ensure crisis decisions don't violate governance
  • This is NON-NEGOTIABLE even under board pressure

6 PMO Specialists

AgentSpecializationsUse When
portfolio-managerMulti-project coordination, strategic alignment, portfolio health, prioritizationPortfolio reviews, project prioritization, capacity assessment
resource-plannerCapacity planning, skills matrix, allocation optimization, conflict resolutionResource allocation, capacity planning, team assignments
governance-specialistGate reviews, compliance, process adherence, audit readinessGate approvals, process compliance, governance audits
risk-analystRAID logs, risk aggregation, mitigation planning, portfolio riskRisk assessments, RAID management, mitigation strategies
executive-reporterPortfolio status dashboards, project summaries, board packages (PMO focus)Portfolio/project status reports, board communications
delivery-reporterGit analysis, squad delivery showcases, visual HTML presentations (engineering focus)Squad delivery reports, release summaries, client showcases

Dispatch template:

Task tool:
  subagent_type: "ring:{agent-name}"
  prompt: "{Your specific request with context}"

When to Use PMO Specialists vs Other Teams

Use PMO Specialists for:

  • Portfolio-level analysis and decisions
  • Resource planning across multiple projects
  • Governance and gate reviews
  • Executive and board reporting
  • Portfolio risk management

Use PM Team (ring-pm-team) for:

  • Single feature planning
  • PRD/TRD creation
  • Task breakdown for one feature
  • Feature-level research

Use Dev Team (ring-dev-team) for:

  • Code implementation
  • Technical architecture
  • DevOps and infrastructure
  • Quality assurance

Teams work together: PMO provides portfolio context → PM plans features → Dev implements code.


Dispatching Multiple Specialists

If you need multiple specialists (e.g., portfolio-manager + risk-analyst), dispatch in parallel (single message, multiple Task calls):

CORRECT:
Task #1: ring:portfolio-manager
Task #2: ring:risk-analyst
(Both run in parallel)

WRONG:
Task #1: ring:portfolio-manager
(Wait for response)
Task #2: ring:risk-analyst
(Sequential = 2x slower)

ORCHESTRATOR Principle

Remember:

  • You're the orchestrator - Dispatch specialists, don't analyze directly
  • Don't read PMO frameworks yourself - Dispatch to specialist, they know their domain
  • Combine with other plugins - PMO + PM + Dev = complete delivery lifecycle

Good Example (ORCHESTRATOR):

"I need portfolio status. Let me dispatch ring:portfolio-manager to analyze."

Bad Example (OPERATOR):

"I'll manually review each project and create a summary myself."

Available in This Plugin

Agents (6):

  • ring:portfolio-manager (Multi-project coordination, strategic alignment, portfolio health)
  • ring:resource-planner (Capacity planning, skills matrix, allocation optimization)
  • ring:governance-specialist (Gate reviews, compliance, process adherence, audit readiness)
  • ring:risk-analyst (RAID logs, risk aggregation, mitigation planning, portfolio risk)
  • ring:executive-reporter (Portfolio status dashboards, project summaries, board packages)
  • ring:delivery-reporter (Git analysis, squad delivery showcases, visual HTML presentations)

Skills (9):

  • ring:using-pmo-team (this skill - plugin introduction and dispatch guide)
  • ring:portfolio-planning (Strategic portfolio planning, capacity assessment, optimization)
  • ring:portfolio-review (Comprehensive portfolio review - dispatches 4 specialists in parallel)
  • ring:resource-allocation (Resource capacity planning and allocation across projects)
  • ring:risk-management (Portfolio-level risk identification, assessment, and mitigation)
  • ring:project-health-check (Individual project health assessment across multiple dimensions)
  • ring:dependency-analysis (Cross-project dependency mapping and management)
  • ring:executive-summary (Executive dashboards, status summaries, and board packages)
  • ring:pmo-retrospective (Portfolio retrospectives and lessons learned)

Note: Missing agents? Check .claude-plugin/marketplace.json for ring-pmo-team plugin.


PMO Workflows

WorkflowEntry PointOutput
Portfolio Reviewring:portfolio-reviewdocs/pmo/{date}/portfolio-status.md
Executive Report (PMO)ring:executive-summarydocs/pmo/{date}/executive-summary.md
Dependency Analysisring:dependency-analysisdocs/pmo/{date}/dependency-map.md

Report Type Selection Guide

Use ring:executive-summary for:

  • Portfolio health dashboards
  • Project status updates (RAG, SPI, CPI)
  • Board packages with governance focus
  • Resource and budget tracking

For squad delivery reports, use the ring:delivery-reporter agent directly.


Integration with Other Plugins

  • ring-default - ORCHESTRATOR principle for ALL agents
  • ring-pm-team - Single feature planning (PMO → PM handoff)
  • ring-dev-team - Development execution (PM → Dev handoff)
  • ring-finops-team - Financial/regulatory compliance

Dispatch based on your need:

  • Portfolio oversight → ring-pmo-team
  • Feature planning → ring-pm-team
  • Code development → ring-dev-team
  • Financial compliance → ring-finops-team

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.05%
按下载量换算68

Claude

28.41%
按下载量换算54

Cursor

18.32%
按下载量换算35

Gemini CLI

9.69%
按下载量换算18

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills