Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索权限需确认github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计未展示

ring%3aroot-cause-tracing环%3a 根本原因追踪

Agent Skill

ring%3aroot-cause-tracing 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

630

周安装

26

GitHub Stars

180

下载量

206
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ring%3aroot-cause-tracing(环%3a 根本原因追踪)
来源仓库:https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring
仓库路径:skills/ring%3Aroot-cause-tracing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:root-cause-tracing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:root-cause-tracing

简介

ring%3aroot-cause-tracing 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。

  • 它适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词或任务需求定位内容。
  • 可通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装,具体功能需结合原始文档确认。
  • 使用前应评估权限范围、维护情况及是否触发联网或命令执行。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Root Cause Tracing

Overview

Bugs often manifest deep in the call stack (git init in wrong directory, file created in wrong location, database opened with wrong path). Your instinct is to fix where the error appears, but that's treating a symptom.

Core principle: Trace backward through the call chain until you find the original trigger, then fix at the source.

When to Use

Use root-cause-tracing when:

  • Error happens deep in execution (not at entry point)
  • Stack trace shows long call chain
  • Unclear where invalid data originated
  • systematic-debugging Phase 1 leads you here

Relationship with systematic-debugging:

  • root-cause-tracing is a SUB-SKILL of systematic-debugging
  • Use during systematic-debugging Phase 1, Step 5 (Trace Data Flow)
  • Can also use standalone if you KNOW bug is deep-stack issue
  • After tracing to source, return to systematic-debugging Phase 2

When NOT to use:

  • Bug appears at entry point → Use systematic-debugging Phase 1 directly
  • You haven't started systematic-debugging yet → Start there first
  • Root cause is obvious → Just fix it
  • Still gathering evidence → Continue systematic-debugging Phase 1

The Tracing Process

  1. Observe Symptom: Error: git init failed in /Users/jesse/project/packages/core
  2. Find Immediate Cause: await execFileAsync('git', ['init'], {cwd: projectDir})
  3. Ask: What Called This? WorktreeManager.createSessionWorktree(projectDir)Session.initializeWorkspace()Session.create() → test at Project.create()
  4. Keep Tracing Up: projectDir = '' (empty!) → resolves to process.cwd() → source code directory!
  5. Find Original Trigger: const context = setupCoreTest() returns {tempDir: ''} → accessed before beforeEach!

Adding Stack Traces

When you can't trace manually, add instrumentation before the problematic operation:

console.error('DEBUG git init:', { directory, cwd: process.cwd(), stack: new Error().stack });

Critical: Use console.error() in tests (logger may not show). Run: npm test 2>&1 | grep 'DEBUG'

Analyze: Look for test file names, line numbers, patterns (same test? same parameter?).

Finding Which Test Causes Pollution

If something appears during tests but you don't know which test:

Use the bisection script: @find-polluter.sh

./find-polluter.sh '.git' 'src/**/*.test.ts'

Runs tests one-by-one, stops at first polluter. See script for usage.

Real Example: Empty projectDir

Symptom: .git in packages/core/ (source code) Trace chain: git init in process.cwd() ← empty cwd ← WorktreeManager ← Session.create() ← test accessed context.tempDir before beforeEach ← setupCoreTest() returns {tempDir: ''} Root cause: Top-level variable initialization accessing empty value Fix: Made tempDir a getter that throws if accessed before beforeEach Defense-in-depth: (1) Project.create() validates (2) WorkspaceManager validates (3) NODE_ENV guard (4) Stack trace logging

Key Principle

Flow: Found immediate cause → Can trace up? (yes → trace backwards) → Is this source? (no → keep tracing | yes → fix at source) → Add validation at each layer → Bug impossible

NEVER fix just where the error appears. Trace back to find the original trigger.

Stack Trace Tips

  • In tests: console.error() not logger (may be suppressed)
  • Before operation: Log before dangerous op, not after fail
  • Include context: Directory, cwd, env vars, timestamps
  • Capture stack: new Error().stack shows complete chain

Real-World Impact

5-level trace → fixed at source (getter validation) → 4 layers defense → 1847 tests, zero pollution


Blocker Criteria

STOP and report if:

Decision TypeBlocker ConditionRequired Action
Incomplete traceCannot trace call chain back to original triggerSTOP and add instrumentation before proceeding
Missing source accessCannot access code that calls problematic functionSTOP and report missing context
Complex async flowCall chain involves async/event-driven code that breaks linear traceSTOP and instrument with timestamps before continuing
External dependencyRoot cause appears to be in external library or serviceSTOP and report external dependency issue

Cannot Be Overridden

The following requirements CANNOT be waived:

  • MUST trace backward through call chain to find original trigger
  • MUST NOT fix where error appears without finding true source
  • MUST add instrumentation when manual tracing is insufficient
  • MUST use defense-in-depth: validate at multiple layers after finding root cause
  • MUST verify fix eliminates the symptom completely

Severity Calibration

SeverityConditionRequired Action
CRITICALError causes data corruption or test pollution across suiteMUST trace to source immediately, cannot proceed until resolved
HIGHError affects multiple call sites or componentsMUST complete full trace before any fix attempt
MEDIUMError isolated to single execution pathMUST trace at least 3 levels up before fixing
LOWError is cosmetic or easily reproducibleShould trace to source, can fix incrementally

Pressure Resistance

User SaysYour Response
"Just fix it where the error appears""MUST NOT fix at symptom location. Tracing to root cause prevents the bug from manifesting elsewhere."
"We don't have time for full tracing""CANNOT skip tracing. Fixing symptoms creates whack-a-mole debugging that takes longer overall."
"The fix works in my test""MUST verify fix eliminates root cause, not just masks symptom in one scenario."
"Add a try-catch and move on""CANNOT suppress errors without tracing. Error indicates invalid state that will cause problems elsewhere."

Anti-Rationalization Table

RationalizationWhy It's WRONGRequired Action
"The error message tells us enough"Error location ≠ error source. Message describes symptom, not cause.MUST trace call chain backward
"I know this code, the fix is obvious"Familiarity breeds assumptions. Obvious fixes often mask deeper issues.MUST verify with actual tracing
"Tracing is overkill for this simple bug"Simple symptoms often have complex causes. Skipping trace leads to regression.MUST trace regardless of apparent simplicity
"Adding logging slows things down"Temporary instrumentation is cheap. Untraced bugs cause expensive debugging sessions.MUST add instrumentation when needed
"The stack trace shows the problem"Stack trace shows where, not why. Original invalid data may be layers above.MUST trace data flow, not just call stack

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

37.62%
按下载量换算77

Claude

29.96%
按下载量换算62

Cursor

20.41%
按下载量换算42

Gemini CLI

9.91%
按下载量换算20

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

权限需确认

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills